1. Hajizadeh, Gh. Aziz, & Kihan., J. (2021). Analysis of the opportunities and challenges of virtual education in the era of Corona: the approach to the development of virtual education after Corona. Journal of Research in Teaching, 9(1), 204-174.

Abbasi, F., Hejazi, E., & Hakimzade, R. (2020). Lived experience of elementary school teachers about the opportunities and challenges of teaching in the educational network of students (SHAD): A phenomenological study. Research in Teaching, 8(3), 24-21.

Ahmadi, Y., Sobhani, P., Housseinpanahi, N., & Felegari, F. (2023). Understanding the effective factors of virtual education in “Shad” system (students' educational network) on the performance of students in the Corona era. Journal of Transcendent Education, 3(2), 16-34.

Akbari, E. (2016). The Role of online Social networks in Teaching and Learning a foreign Language: Effects on Learning Process and Outcome.

Akbari, E. (2019). Foundations and Concepts of e-Learning (Iranian student book agency. academic jihad ed(.

Akbari, E. (2021). Challenges and effectiveness of using the SHAD social network during COVID-19 according to teachers, parents and students. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(4), pp296-304.

Akbari, E., Naderi, A., Simons, R.-J., & Pilot, A. (2016). Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1, 1-22.

Amankwah, F., Sarfo, F. K., Aboagye, M. O., Konin, D., & Dzakpasu, R. K. (2022). Concerns of university teachers about the adoption of the Moodle learning management system in a Ghanaian University campus. Education Inquiry, 1-21.

Barakhsanova, E. A., Prokopyev, M. S., Olesova, S. G., Olesov, N. P., Lukina, T. N., Sorochinskiy, M. A., & Tatarinov, F. F. (2020). Transdisciplinary approach to the learning process organization in the e-learning information environment of a college. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 11, (3).

Gabby, S., Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2017). The case of middle and high school chemistry teachers implementing technology: Using the concerns-based adoption model to assess change processes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 214-232.

George, A., Hall, G., & Stiegelbauer, S. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The Stages of Concern Questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southeast Educational Development Laboratory. Guide to teaching online courses (2006). Washington, DC: National Education Association. In.

George, A. A., Hall, G. E., Stiegelbauer, S. M., & Litke, B. (2008). Stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2019). Investigating in-service teachers’ concerns about adopting technology-enhanced embodied learning. Paper presented at the Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies: 14th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2019, Delft, The Netherlands, 16–19, 14.

Ghasemi, G., & Akbari, E. (2023). Characteristics of teachers and choice of teaching approach (face-to-face teaching, e-learning, blended learning) in the era of Covid-19. Teaching and learning research, -. doi:10.22070/tlr.2023.18287.1495

Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-learning vs. face-to-face learning: Analyzing students’ preferences and behaviors. Sustainability, 13(8), 4381.

Hall, G. E. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC Questionnaire.

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process: Suny Press.

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

Horsley, D. L., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1998). CBAM Brings Order to the Tornado of Change. Journal of staff development, 19(4), 17-20.

Kirkland, K., & Sutch, D. (2009). Overcoming the barriers to educational innovation: A literature review: Futurelab.

Li, X., Marlor, L., Carroll, L., & Finelli, C. (2022). WIP: Faculty Adoption of Active Learning in Online Environments: An Application of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model. Paper presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Ling, T. Y., & Wah, L. L. (2017). Profil tahap keprihatinan guru terhadap inovasi Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR) berdasarkan model Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(3), 1-21.

Lo, S., & Nasri, N. M. (2022). Science Teachers’ Level of Concern on Dual Language Programme (DLP) in Primary Schools in Sri Aman District.

Magallanes, K., Chung, J. Y., & Lee, S. (2022). The Philippine Teachers Concerns on Educational Reform Using Concern Based Adoption Model. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education.

Mahdizadeh, H., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2008). Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers. Computers & education, 51(1), 142-154.

Najafi, H. (2019). Comparing of the effect of blended and traditional teaching on learning. Research in Medical Education, 11(2), 54-63.

Nasri, N. M. (2018). Teachers’ Concerns on the Implementation and Practices of i-THINK with Concern Based Adoption Model (CBAM). Creative Education, 9(14), 2183.

Rezaei, K., & Salimi, J. (1401). "Investigation the level of acceptance of curriculum innovations among primary school teachers based on the concern-based acceptance model" (CBAM). Retrieved from https://research.uok.ac.ir/_Pages/Research.aspx?Id=64272

Rusmawaty, D., Hermagustiana, I., & Sunardi, S. (2023). An Exploration of EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Experiences of E-Learning Implementation through the Concern-Based Adoption Model.

192. Shafiei, M., Akbari Borang, H., Pourshafei, & Nejad, M. R. (2021). Teacher-student interactions in the student social network (Shad): a qualitative approach. Journal of Research in Teaching, 9(4), 116-192.

Salimy, S., Bahari, A., & Moody, B. (2021a). Analysis of Lived Experiences of Elementary School Teachers about Strengths and Weaknesses of Shad Education Network During the Covid pandemic 19. New Educational Approaches, 16(2), 81-98.

Salimy, S., Bahari, A., & Moody, B. (2021b). Analysis of Lived Experiences of Elementary School Teachers about Strengths and Weaknesses of Shad Education Network During the Covid pandemic 19. Journal of New Educational Approaches, 16(2), 81-98.

Saunders, R. (2012). Assessment of Professional Development for Teachers in the Vocational Education and Training Sector: An Examination of the Concerns Based Adoption Model. Australian Journal of Education. 56. doi:10.1177/000494411205600206

Seyed Jafari, A., & Seyed Jafari, R. (2023). Investigation the opportunities and challenges of e-learning in the era of Corona with an emphasis on virtual networks (SHAD) and the development approach of e-learning in post-Corona. Journal of New Advances in Behavioral Sciences, 8(56), 304-317.

Shin, M., & Park, I. (2023). Investigation of K-12 Teachers’ Stages of Concern and Innovation Configuration About the Utilization of Edtech Based on CBAM. Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 275-314.

Sultana, N. (2015). Application of Concerned based adoption model (CBAM) for launching the information technology based teacher education programme at AIOU. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(3), 153-166.

Tingrui, Y., & Deng, M. Regular education teachers’ concerns on inclusive education in China from the perspective of concerns-based adoption model. International Journal of Inclusive Education., 23, 1-21. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1435741.

Trapani, B., & Annunziato, A. (2019). Crossing the Bridge of Change: Measuring Instructional Change Using the Concerns Based Adoption Model. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 18(1), 12-16.

Tunks, J., & Weller, K. (2009). Changing practice, changing minds, from arithmetical to algebraic thinking: An application of the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 161-183.

Vandenhouten, C., Gallagher-Lepak, S., Reilly, J., & Ralston-Berg, P. (2014). Collaboration in E-Learning: A Study Using the Flexible E-Learning Framework. Online Learning, 18(3), n3.