نقش تمرکز بر آموزش و بهینه‏سازی زمان آموزش معلم در کلاس بر عملکرد تحصیلی با میانجی‏گری رضایت تحصیلی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده اجتماعی و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه مازندران، مازندران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، مجتمع آموزش عالی گناباد، گناباد، ایران.

3 استادیار دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

10.22034/trj.2023.62899

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر‌، بررسی نقش تمرکز بر آموزش و بهینه ‏سازی زمان آموزش معلم در کلاس بر عملکرد تحصیلی با میانجی‏ گری رضایت تحصیلی بوده است. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بوده است. جامعه آماری، شامل کلیه معلمان و دانش ‏آموزان متوسطه دوم شهر بابل می‏ باشد که با استفاده از شیوه نمونه‏ گیری خوشه‌ای سه مرحله‌ای 50 معلم و 336 دانش ‏آموز به‌عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شده‌اند. جهت گردآوری داده‌ها، از سه پرسشنامه؛ تمرکز و  بهینه ‏سازی زمان آموزش (Esterank et al, 2018)، پرسشنامه عملکرد تحصیلی (Fam & Taylor, 1999)، و پرسشنامه رضایت تحصیلی (Diener, et al., 1985) استفاده شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات از ضرایب همبستگی پیرسون و مدل تحلیل مسیر استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که تمرکز بر آموزش(۰۱/۰>p، ۴۵۷/0=β) و بهینه ‏سازی زمان آموزش (۰۱/۰>p، ۲۴۱/0=β)، معلمان در کلاس بر عملکرد تحصیلی تأثیر مثبت دارد. هم‏چنین نتایج نشان داد که رضایت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان در تأثیر تمرکز بر آموزش (۰۱/۰>p، ۱۳۷/0=β)  و بهینه ‏سازی زمان آموزش (۰۱/۰>p، ۱۴۳/0=β) بر عملکرد تحصیلی نقش میانجی دارد. بنابراین معلمان می ‏توانند با تمرکز و بهینه‌سازی زمان آموزش، میزان آموزش و یادگیری را به حداکثر برسانند تا از این طریق میزان موفقیت و رضایت تحصیلی دانش‌آموز در کلاس‌ها بیشتر شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Focusing on Instruction And Optimizing Instructional Time of Teacher In The Classroom on Educational Performance With The Mediation of Academic Satisfaction

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Hajitabar Firouzjaee 1
  • o azad 2
  • Elham Akbari 3
1 Associate Professor(Ph.D.), Department of Educational Sciences, University Of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Gonabad Higher Education Complex, Gonabad, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Human Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of the current research was to investigate the role of Focusing on Instruction and Optimizing Instructional timeof teacher in the classroom on the Educational performance with the mediation of academic satisfaction. The descriptive research method was correlational. The statistical population included all secondary school teachers and students of Babol city, among whom 50 teachers and 336 students were selected as a statistical sample using a Three-stage cluster sampling method. The instrumental tool for the data collection included three questionnaires of Focusing and Optimizing Instructional time (Stronge, 2018), Educational performance questionnaire (Pham & Taylor, 1999), and academic satisfaction questionnaire (Diener & etal, 1985). Pearson correlation coefficients and path analysis model were used to analyze the data. The results showed that Focusing on Instruction (p < 0.01, β = 0.457) and Optimizing Instructional time (p < 0.01, β = 0.241) have a positive effect on the Educational performance of teachers in the classroom. The results showed that students' academic satisfaction has a mediating role in the effect of Focusing on Instruction (p<0.01, β=0.137) and Optimizing Instructional time (p<0.01, β=0.143) on Educational performance. Therefore, teachers can maximize the amount of Instruction and learning by focusing and optimizing the Instruction time, so as to increase the success rate and academic satisfaction of the students in the classes.
   Introduction: Optimizing teaching time and focusing on teaching in the classroom as one of the key elements of educational planning has a special place and importance in improving the quality academic performance and academic satisfaction of students because focusing on teaching, planning The teacher directs the behavior of the class and the optimization of teaching time leads to the development of an integrated curriculum by the teacher and avoids the teacher from overemphasizing one content area at the expense of neglecting other areas.
 The aim of the current research is to investigate the role of focus on education and optimization of teacher training time in the classroom on academic performance with the mediation of academic satisfaction. For this purpose, the current research seeks to answer the following question: 1. Does academic satisfaction of students play a mediating role in the effect of focusing on education and optimizing education time on academic performance?
Methodology: According to the purpose of this research, it is an applied research, and in terms of its implementation, it is a descriptive-survey research of the correlation type. The statistical population includes all teachers (765 people) and students (10,463 people) of the second secondary school in Babol city, using a three-stage cluster sampling method, 50 teachers and 336 students Students were selected as samples. First, 8 schools (4 girls' and 4 boys' schools) were randomly selected from the second secondary schools of Babol city, then 4 classes were randomly selected from each school. Then 12 students were randomly selected from each class.
Discussion: Based on the obtained results, focusing on training and optimizing teachers' training time in the classroom has an effect on academic performance, so it can be said that the research hypothesis has been confirmed and the conclusion is that focusing on teacher training and optimizing training time in The class has a positive effect on students' academic performance (β=0.457, p<0.01; β=0.241, p<0.01). Also, the results showed that students' academic satisfaction is influenced by focus on education and optimal Teaching time has a mediating role on academic performance. Therefore, it can be said that the hypothesis of the research has been confirmed and it can be concluded that students' academic satisfaction is influenced by focus on education (p < 0.01, β = 0.137) and optimal Teaching time (p < 0.01, β = 0.143) has a mediating role on academic performance.
The results of the current research are in line with the research findings (Curby, et al., 2013; CoSpear-Swerling & Zibulsky, 2014; Lee, 2011; Gettinger & Walter, 2012) who showed in their research that effective teachers of cohesion and organization in classes They consider their lessons important and consider the student's attention spans when designing lessons; Effective teachers strengthen their focus on teaching by devoting time to teaching and the learning process and by having expectations for student learning, and the quality of teaching is directly related to student learning; And it is also in line with the research findings (Brophy, 2011; Gettinger & Walter, 2012;) which showed that effective teachers take help from the management to minimize the external disturbing factors in order to preserve the teaching time and increase the time spent on learning. be
In the analysis of the results of this research, the results of Taylor et al (2009); Stronge (2018) and Stronge, Ward, & Grant (2011) confirm it, it can be said that teachers can maximize the amount of teaching and learning by careful and thoughtful use of time. Also, whenever the training time is maximized (training time optimization), the student's success rate in classes will increase. Consequently, one of the characteristics seen in the classrooms of effective teachers is the prioritization of instruction, a process that is accomplished in part through time allocation.
Also, in the analysis of these results such as the research results of Stronge & Xu, 2015); Baumert et al., 2010); Estes, Mintz & Gunter 2010; Cangelosi, 2014; Rivkin & Schiman, 2015; Gettinger & Walter, 2012 and (Kane et al, 2011) it can be said that effective teachers use various techniques and strategies such as (maintaining regular procedures and routines, managing and performing executive tasks quickly and In an effective way, preparing the content and materials in advance, the logical sequence of the learning process by establishing new knowledge based on previous knowledge, adjusting the time and speed of teaching the content area according to the performance and growth of the student, doing tasks and planning. with colleagues in a collaborative way in order to promote the coherence of learning in students, limiting interruptions in lessons through the use of appropriate behavior management techniques, and allocating class time in a logical and defensible manner for teaching each lesson and between teaching lessons) In addition, they provide a framework to not only maximize instructional time but also maximize student opportunities for each assignment.
In the analysis of the results of this research, which is confirmed by the results of Park, & Park (2011) and Landrum (2020), it can be said that students who express a positive opinion about their academic capacity and ability, complete their educational assignments better and as a result, get better grades in the courses. Therefore, academic satisfaction has a key role in the education process and can be influential in the growth and development of the educational system in any society. Also, it can be claimed that academic satisfaction expresses the status of the educational system, and on the other hand, the academic satisfaction component has a facilitating role in the learning process and can help a person to have a desirable life in the future. to help (Park, & Park, 2011).
    According to the findings of this research as well as the research conducted in other countries, based on the positive effect of focusing on education and optimizing the education time on academic satisfaction and academic performance, it is suggested that in the ready time The training of teachers in Farhangian University and in-service courses, the necessary strategies and skills to focus on teaching and optimizing the teaching time by the teacher in the classroom should be addressed. It is also suggested to the teachers to maximize the teaching time by organizing the classroom in order to influence the academic performance and academic satisfaction of the students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Focusing on Instruction
  • Optimizing Instructional time
  • Educational Performance
  • Academic satisfaction
Aelenei, C., Jury, M., Darnon, C., Sicard, A., Maggio, S., & Martinot, D. (2023). Self‐enhancement values and academic achievement: An interaction with students' parental level of education and gender?. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 626-640.
Allan, B. A., Sterling, H. M., & Duffy, R. D. (2020). Longitudinal relations among economic deprivation, work volition, and academic satisfaction: A psychology of working perspective. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 20, 311-329.
Bago, B. A. (2022). Effect of Single Parenthood in Students’ Academic Performance; A Case of Selected Secondary Schools in Bitereko Sub County Mitooma District. IAA Journal of Social Sciences (IAA-JSS), 8(1), 216-226.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ athematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2012). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444.
Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Cangelosi, J. S. (2014). Classroom management strategies: Gaining and maintaining students’ cooperation (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
Chau, S., & Cheung, C. (2018). Academic satisfaction with hospitality and tourism education
in Macao: The influence of active learning, academic motivation, and student engagement. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4), 473–487. Https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.201
8.1500350
Chute, E. (2010). Instructional time: Not enough hours in the day. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved fromhttps://www.pinerichland.org/site/default.aspx?Pagetype=3&moduleinstanceid=973&viewid=7b-
Curby, T. W., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Abry, T. (2013). Do emotional support and classroom organization earlier in the year set the stage for higher quality instruction? Journal of School Psychology, 51(5), 557–569.
Ddurber, C. M., Yeates, K. O., Taylor, H. G., Walz, N. C., Stancin, T., & Wade, S. L. (2017). The family environment predicts long-term academic achievement and classroom behavior following traumatic brain injury in early childhood. Neuropsychology, 31(5), 499.
Diener, E. (1995). Subjective well-being in cross-cultural perspective. In H. Grad, A. Blanco, &
J. Georgas (Eds.), Key issues in cross-cultural psychology. Swets & Zeitlinger.
Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment49(1), 71-75.
Estes, T. H., Mintz, S. L., & Gunter, M. A. (2010). Instruction: A models approach (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Farbman, D. A. (2015). The case for improving and expanding time in school: A review of key research and practice. National Center on Time & Learning. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561994.pdf
Finn, M., Mihut, G., & Darmody, M. (2022). Academic satisfaction of international students at Irish higher education institutions: The role of region of origin and cultural distance in the context of marketization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(5), 572-589.
Flores A.  (2007). Attributional style, self-efficacy, and stress as predictors of academic success and academic satisfaction in college students. University of Utah.
Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. J. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In S. L.
Ghaedi, B., Qalatash, A., Hashemi, A., & Machanchi, A. (2019). The Effectiveness of Teaching Based on Social Constructivism on Academic Achievement, Critical Thinking, and Motivation for Academic Achievement in Elementary Sixth Grade Students. Journal of Research in Teaching. 7 (2). 37-53. [Persian]
Giangreco, A., Carugati, A., Sebastiano, A., & Della Bella, D. (2010). Trainees' reactions to training: shaping groups and courses for happier trainees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(13), 2468-2487.
Hajitabarfirozjaee, M. (2019). Presenting a Structural Model Effect of Students' Perception of Classroom Environment on Academic Self-efficacy and Attitudes to Science with Mediated Perception of Evaluation. Journal of Research in Teaching .7 (3). 209-226. [Persian]
Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011a). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: Can classroom observations identify practices that raise achievement?. Education Next, 11(3), 54–61.
Kumar, S., Agarwal, M., & Agarwal, N. (2021). Defining and measuring academic performance of Hei students-a critical review. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6), 3091-3105
Landrum, B. (2020). Examining Students' Confidence to Learn Online, Self-Regulation Skills and Perceptions of Satisfaction and Usefulness of Online Classes. Online Learning, 24(3), 128-146.
Lee, S. H. (2011). Working memory, attention, and mathematical problem solving: A longitudinal study of elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 821–837.
Martí, E. (2003). “Representar el mundo externamente. La construcción
infantil de los sistemas externos de representación”. Madrid: Antonio
Machado.
Martínez-Otero, V. (2007). Los adolescentes ante el estudio. Causas y
consecuencias del rendimiento académico. Madrid: Fundamentos
Neto, F. (2019). Subjective well-being of Angolan students in Portugal. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(4), 456–473.  Https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319861353
Park, M., & Park, M. (2011). The relationships among learning behaviors, major satisfaction, and study skills of first-year medical students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 23(2), 83-93.
Perrin, B., Banks, F., & Dargue, B. (2004). Student vs. Software pacing of instruction: An empirical comparison of effectiveness. Paper presented at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference, Orlando, FL.
Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S, E. (1999). “From Thought to Action: Effects of Process- Versus Outcome-Based Mental Simulations on Performance”. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 2,250-260.
Pizarro, R. (1985). “Rasgos y Actitudes del Profesor Efectivo. Tesis para optar al Grado de Magíster en Ciencias de la Educación. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile”.
Prifti, R. (2022). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37(2), 111-125.
Rivkin, S. H., & Schiman, J. C. (2015). Instruction time, classroom quality, and academic achievement. The Economic Journal, 125, 425–448.
Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of Effective Teachers, 3rd edition, Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD
Stronge, J. H., & Xu, X. (2015). Instructional planning for effective teaching. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355.
Talsma, K., Schüz, B., & Norris, K. (2019). Miscalibration of self-efficacy and academic performance: Self-efficacy, self-fulfilling prophecy. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 182-195.
Taylor, D. B., Mraz, M., Nichols, W. D., Rickelman, R. J., & Wood, K. D. (2009). Using explicit instruction to promote vocabulary learning for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Diffi culties, 25(2–3), 205–220.
Tian, L., Chen, H., & Huebner, E. S. (2014). The longitudinal relationships between basic psychological needs satisfaction at school and school-related subjective well-being in adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 119, 353-372.
Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1990). Construction et validation de l’Échelle de Satisfaction
dans les Études [Construction and validation of the Satisfaction Scale in Studies]. Canadian. Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 699–713
Wach, F.-S., Karbach, J., Ruffing, S., Brünken, R., & Spinath, F. M. (2016). University students’
satisfaction with their academic studies: Personality and motivation matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(55). Https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00055
Willcox, M., & Del R. (2011). Factores de riesgo y protección para el rendimiento académico: Un estudio descriptivo en estudiantes de Psicología de una universidad privada. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 55(1), 1-9.
Recuperado de http://www.rieoei.org/deloslectores/3878Wilcox.pdf
Wu, Y., & Zhang, F. (2023). The health cost of attending higher-achievement schools: Peer effects on adolescents’ academic performance and mental health. In The Frontier f Education Reform and Development in China: Articles from Educational Research (pp. 211-240). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.