سنجش اثربخشی آموزش به روش معکوس بر عملکرد تحصیلی و انگیزش یادگیرندگان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی پژوهشکده تحقیق و توسعه علوم انسانی . تهران. ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد تکنولوژی آموزشی از دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، آموزگار ابتدایی، تهران، ایران

10.22034/trj.2023.62835

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر سنجش اثربخشی آموزش به روش معکوس بر عملکرد تحصیلی و انگیزش یادگیرندگان بود. برای نیل به این هدف از روش پژوهش از نوع  نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیش‌آزمون – پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل استفاده شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی دانش‌آموزان پسر پایه چهارم ابتدایی مدارس دولتی منطقه 18 شهر تهران در سال تحصیلی 02 – 1401 بود. با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای، تعداد دو کلاس هرکدام با ظرفیت 28 دانش‌آموز به‌صورت تصادفی به گروه‌های آزمایش و کنترل اختصاص یافتند. هر دو گروه به مدت یک نیمسال تحصیلی و در 15 جلسه در معرض آموزش قرار گرفتند. آموزش برای گروه آزمایش با استفاده از روش آموزش معکوس، و برای گروه  کنترل با روش مرسوم و غیر معکوس ارائه شد. عملکرد تحصیلی یادگیرندگان با استفاده از نمرات آن‌ها در آزمون کتبی عملکردی درس علوم، و انگیزش به دوره با استفاده از پرسشنامه انگیزش دوره کلر مورد سنجش قرار گرفت. یافته‌ها با استفاده از آزمون‌های آمار توصیفی، و آمار استنباطی به روش تحلیل کوواریانس، و توسط نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخه 22 تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که آموزش به روش معکوس تأثیر مثبتی بر عملکرد تحصیلی و انگیزش یادگیرندگان به دوره آموزشی دارد. به‌طورکلی، آموزش به روش معکوس یک روش نوین برای آموزش و یادگیری در عصر دیجیتال است که می‌تواند باعث تسهیل و بهبود یادگیری شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Measuring The Effectiveness of Flipped Instruction Method on Students’ Academic Performance And Motivation

نویسندگان [English]

  • taleb zandi 1
  • Farzaneh Pashaee 2
  • sahar ghazi 2
1 Assistant Professor in Educational Technology, The Institute for Research and Development in the Humanities (SAMT), Tehran, Iran.
2 Master of Educational Technology from Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The current research was conducted with the aim of measuring the effectiveness of flipped instruction on Students’ academic performance and motivation. Flipped instruction is defined as a pedagogical approach in which traditional classroom activities and students' homework are done in reverse. In this educational approach, the basic concepts and content to be learned are often provided to the learners through the capabilities and technologies of electronic learning before entering the class, and the classroom time is dedicated to doing homework and applying and deepening Students’ learning. In this research, a semi-experimental research method with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group was used. The statistical population of this research included all fourth-grade male students of public schools in the 18th district of Tehran, including 21 schools. Using the multi-stage cluster sampling method, two classes each with a capacity of 28 students were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Both experimental and control groups were trained for one semester (15 weeks). For the experimental group, instruction was provided by using the flipped instruction method and for the control group by using the conventional and non-flipped method. The students' academic performance was measured by using their scores in the functional written test of the science course, and their motivation to the course was measured by using the Keller's course motivation questionnaire. This questionnaire includes 36 items and the range of scores obtained by each person is from 36 to 180. Answers to the questions are designed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from false (score 1) to completely true (score 5). Items 3, 7, 12, 15, 19, 22, 26, 29, 31, and 34 are scored in reverse. The higher score showed the higher learner's motivation towards the course and instructional materials, and the lower score showed the lower motivation towards the course and instructional materials. Zandi et al. (2016) reported the reliability of this tool using Cronbach's alpha 0/70. The findings analyzed using descriptive statistics and covariance analysis and done by SPSS software. The results of covariance analysis showed that there is a significant difference (F=183.77, P<0.01) between the scores of the experimental and control groups in the academic performance in the science course. The obtained eta coefficient of 0.593 means that about 59% of the variance of the students' academic performance scores in the science course is related to group membership and as a result of using the flipped instruction technology. Also, by referring to the average pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental and control groups, it is clear that the flipped instruction method has more effectiveness on academic performance than the conventional and non- flipped method. In this regard, it seems that by receiving instructional materials electronically and before the face-to-face part of the classroom, the learners have had enough opportunity to engage with the content and focus and reflect on the expected learning activities. Then, by participating in the face-to-face classroom and discussing and exchanging ideas with their classmates and with the guidance and facilitating of the teacher, as well as by doing homework related to the subject of learning in a cooperative and collaborative manner, and then receiving the necessary feedback from the class, learners have been able to understand and Improve and complete their understanding of learning content.
Also, the results of covariance analysis showed that there is a significant difference (F=0.001, P<0.01) between the scores of the experimental and control groups in motivation to the course in science. The obtained eta coefficient of 0.514 means that about 51% of the variance of the students' course motivation scores in the science course is related to the group membership and as a result of using the flipped instruction technology. Also, by referring to the average pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental and control groups, it is clear that the flipped instruction method has more effectiveness on the motivation of the learners toward course than the conventional and non- non- flipped method. it seems that Learners who have benefited from flipped classroom, due to receiving and studying the learning content in different ways, including in the form of video materials and other forms of media, studying at personal pace, and followed by participation in the cooperative environment of the face-to-face classroom, showed more enthusiasm and motivation to learn, and as a result, they were more satisfied with learning in this way. In the flipped instruction model, learners have access to educational materials anytime and anywhere, especially through educational videos sent by the instructor, control over playing and stopping videos, as well as the ability to repeat viewing them many times, they have experienced a flexible and stimulating learning environment. The results showed that the flipped instruction technology has a positive effect on the Students’ academic performance and motivation. In general, flipped instruction technology is a new method for teaching and learning in the digital age that can facilitate and improve the learning.
In general, compared to conventional and traditional methods, flipped instruction increase the motivation for the course and improve the academic performance of the learners. Adopting this approach to teaching and learning allows learners to discuss the subject of the lesson with each other, and it also provides the possibility for teachers and trainers to play a guiding and facilitating role. In this regard, on the one hand, due to the predominance of the learner-centered paradigm and the necessity of designing instruction based on the constructivist approach in the modern teaching-learning system, and on the other hand, due to the availability of more access of educators and learners to the capabilities of digital technologies and electronic learning environments, especially after the Covid-19 pandemic, the use of the flipped instruction approach in educational systems around the world is gradually expanding. Now, many educators and teachers use this approach and encourage others to use it in their classrooms. This educational approach can somehow inspire educators and teachers to change from traditional methods to learner-oriented methods and approaches by integrating new technologies in classrooms. Therefore, it is suggested that in Iran's educational system, by providing the necessary infrastructure and holding training courses and workshops for teachers and school officials, this effective educational model should be used more and better.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Flipped Instruction
  • Learner-Centered Paradigm
  • Academic Performance
  • Motivation
  • Learning In Digital Age
Abolghasemi, M., & Mohammadi, H. (2020). The effectiveness of filliped learning method on attitude and academic performance in Mathematics in elementary schools. Education technology, 15 (1), 1 – 8 [in Persian]
Aprianto, A., Ritonga, M., Marlius, Y., & Nusyur, R. (2020). The infuence of using audio-lingual method on students’ speaking skill in Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliyah Awwaliyyah. Izdihar Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature. 3, 2, 147–160.  
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Arlington: ISTE.
Bouwmeester, R. A. M., De Kleijn, R. A. M., Van den Berg, I. E. T., Ten Cate, O. T. J., Van Rijen, H. V. M., & Westerveld, H. E. (2019). Flipping the medical classroom: Effect on workload, interactivity, motivation and retention of knowledge. Computers & Education, 139 (1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.002
Bredow, C. A., Roehling, P. V., Knorp, A. J., & Sweet, A. M. (2021). To flip or not to Flip? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of flipped learning in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 91, 6. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019122
Campillo-Ferrer, J.M., & Miralles-Martinez, P. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on students’ self-reported motivation and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8, 176. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00860-4
Campos-Gutiérrez, L.M., Selles-Perez, S., Garcia-Jaen, M. Y., Ferriz-Valero, A. (2021). A Flipped
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development. 67, 793–824. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
Chung, E., & Lee, B. (2018). the effects of flipped learning on learning motivation and attitudes in a class of college physical therapy students. Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5 (1) 29-36. DOI:10.24313/jpbl.2018.5.1.29
Chyr, W. L., Shen, P. D., Chiang, Y. C., Lin, J. B., & Tsia, C. W. (2017). Exploring the effects of online academic help-seeking and flipped learning on improving students’ learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20, 11–23.
Clark, R.M., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Budny, D., Bursic, K.M., Clark, W.W., Norman, B.A., Parker, R.S., Patzer, J.F., & Slaughter, W.S. (2016). Flipping Engineering Courses: A School Wide Initiative. Advances in engineering education, 5(3):n3.
Cronhjort, M., Filipsson, L., & Weurlander, M. (2017). Improved engagement and learning in flippedclassroom calculus. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 37(3), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx007
Davey P. The flipped classroom: Motivating student nurses to learn independently. Athens J Health, 2(4):261-70. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajh.2-4-2
Divjak, B., Rienties, B., Iniesto, F., Vondra, P., & Zizak, M. (2022). Flipped classrooms in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings and future research recommendations. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 19(1), 9. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-021-00316-4
Dusenbury, M.J., & Olson, M.R. (2019). The Impact of Flipped Learning on Student Academic Performance and Perceptions. Collegiate Aviation Review International, 37(1), 19-44.
Eddy, SL., & Hogan KA. (2014). Getting under the hood: how and for whom does increasing course structure work?. CBE-Life Sci Educ, 13(3):453-468.
Fulton, K. (2012). The Flipped Classroom: Transforming Education at Byron High School: A Minnesota High School with Severe Budget Constraints Enlisted YouTube in Its Successful Effort to Boost Math Competency Scores. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education, 39, 18.
Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.) (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Learning in Physical Education: Learning, Motivation and Motor Practice Time. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, 21 (81) pp. 63-81. https://doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2021.81.005
McLaughlin, JE., Roth, MT., Glatt, DM., et al. (2014). The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med, 89(2), 236-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086
Mehring, J. (2017). Technology as a teaching and learning tool in the flipped classroom. In M. Carrier, R. Damerow, & K. M. Bailey (Eds.), Digital Language Learning and Teaching: Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 67-78). New York, NY: Routledge & TIRF.
Monzonis, NC., Mendez, VG., Ariza, AC., & Magana, EC. (2020). Flipped classroom in COVID-19 times: a cross-talking perspective. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15:326–341. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5439
Moravec, Marin. - Williams, Adrienne. - Aguilar-Roca, Nancy. - O'Dowd, Dianne, K. (2010). Learn before lecture: a strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473-481.
Naciri, A., El Hajji, M., Radid, M., Kharbach, A., & Chemsi, G. (2022). Exploring Student Motivation and Performance in the Flipped Classroom: A Case Study of Nursing Students. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 19(3), em364. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11796
Nolan, E., Brady, M., Rienties, B., & Heliot, Y. (2021). Once more on the rollercoaster: loses and gains from the rapid shift to online delivery during Covid. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.15358abstract
Nouri, Jalal. (2016). the flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning - especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 33. doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z
O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C., Karanicolas, S., Snelling, C., & Winning, T. (2015). Corrigendum to “The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education (25), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Omrani, P. Gaderi, M., & Afkari, F. (2021). Effectiveness of Flipped Teaching on Students' Academic Resilience. Research in curriculum planning, 18 (2), 41(68), 178 -189[in Persian]
Palincsar, A. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
Persky, AM., Jacqueline, E., & McLaughlin JE. (2017). the Flipped Classroom - From Theory to Practice in Health Professional Education.  American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(6):118.  DOI: 10.5688/ajpe816118
Reigeluth, C.M., Beatty, B.J., & Myers, R.D. (Eds.). (2016). Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume IV: The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education (1st Ed.). Routledge.
Robertson, W.H. (2022). The Constructivist Flipped Classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 52,. 2, Retrieved pdf from: https://www.nsta.org/journal-college-science-teaching/journal-college-science-teaching-novemberdecember-2022-0
Sahebyar, H., Ghol Mohammad Nejhad, GH., & Barghi, E. (2021). The effectiveness of reverse learning on the academic engagement of second year high school students in mathematics. Educational Psychology Quarterly, 17 (59), 289 – 316[in Persian]
Sheera, H., & Yadav, M. (2022). An Analytical Investigation of Flipped Classroom to Improve Saudi EFL Learners’ Speaking Skills: a Case Study at Applied College. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on CALL. 8, 274- 298. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.19
Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 79–103.
Soleymani, SH., Aliabadi, KH., Zareezavaraki, E., & Delavar, A. (2022). The effect of Flipped-Learning Model Based on the Problem-Solving Teaching Approach on Students' Problem-Solving Styles of English Language Learning. Linguistic research in foreign languages, 12 (3), 328 – 342 [in Persian]
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: a meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
Swan, A. K., Sleeter, N. M., & Schrum, K. (2019). Teaching Hidden History: A Case Study of Dialogic Scaffolding in a Hybrid Graduate Course. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 13: 1. doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130107
Xiu, Y., & Thompson, P. (2020). Flipped university class: A study of motivation and learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 41-63. https://doi.org/10.28945/4500
Yilmaz R. Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Comput Hum Behav, 70, 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085
Zandi, T., Hatami, J., Fardanesh, H., & Talaee, E. (2017). Combining motivational and volitional factors in e-learning and its impact on student learning and motivation. Teaching Research Quarterly, (5), 3, 109 – 129[in Persian]
Zhang, S. L. (2019). Chinese-as-a-foreign-language learners’ use of self-regulated learning in flipped/blended learning environments - a descriptive study. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 10, 181–204. DOI:10.37237/100205
Zuber, W.J. (2016). The flipped classroom, a review of the literature. Industrial and Commercial Training, 48 (2), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2015-0039