شناسایی مؤلفه‌های محیط یادگیری مبتنی بر فناوری سیار به‌منظور اجرای کلاس معکوس اثربخش: یک مطالعه سنتزپژوهی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی ، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد تکنولوژی آموزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات ، تهران، ایران

10.22034/trj.2022.62690

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی مؤلفه‌های محیط یادگیری مبتنی بر فناوری سیار به‌منظور اجرای کلاس معکوس اثربخش: یک مطالعه سنتزپژوهی بود. رویکرد پژوهش ،کیفی و از نوع سنتز پژوهی بود. جامعه آماری کلیه آثار منتشر شده در این حوزه بود که در جستجوی اولیه 179 منبع شناسایی شد. به‌منظور دسترسی به پیشینه و جمع‌آوری منابع نظری متناسب با هدف پژوهش از پایگاه‌های داخلی مگ­ایران، نورمگز، سیویلیکا، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی، ایران نمایه و پایگاه‌های خارجی اسکوپوس، ساینس دایرکت، پروکوئست، اریک، اشپرینگر و گوگل اسکالر  در بازه زمانی 1393 تا 1401 برای اسناد فارسی و  برای اسناد انگلیسی، بازه زمانی، 2013 تا 2022 استفاده شد. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها  از  روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی استقرایی و تحلیل تماتیک استفاده شد. یافته‌های پژوهشی در ۴ بعد مضامین، مقولات و مقولات هسته‌ای (اصلی) طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل شدند. نتیجه تحقیق نشان داد در  محیط‌های یادگیری فناوری سیار برای اجرای کلاس معکوس اثربخش باید مؤلفه‌های محتوای آموزش، روش‌های یادگیری، اشتراک‌گذاری، تولید محتوا، اهداف آموزشی، ارزیابی یادگیرنده محور و انتقال آموزش به خارج از کلاس، سیار بودن و پشتیبانی فناورانه را در نظر داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying The Components of The Learning Environment Based on Mobile Technology In Order To Implement An Effective Flipped Classroom: A Synthesis Study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rahim Moradi 1
  • malihe marjani 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran
2 Master of Educational Technology, Islamic Azad University, Department of Research Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Learning environments are considered to be one of the most basic factors of effective learning. With the advent of the 20th century, the nature of these environments has undergone fundamental changes and transformations (Moradi, Fazeli & Hoseni, 2021). In the past decades, when the volume of information was more limited, the methods used could easily help to remember and link information to each other and create new findings. But now that the amount of information has exceeded the previously limited boundaries, traditional learning methods cannot be less effective for the current amount of information (2022, Banks & Kay). This is despite the fact that in recent years, the introduction of the Internet into education changed the attitude and expectations of physical learning environments. Gradually, the learning environment will develop as future schools as lifelong learning centers (2021, OECD). On the other hand, it can be said that technological developments created a new learning environment that has non-physical dimensions. Internet; This environment can be accessed from anywhere through tools such as computers, tablets or smartphones (Mäkelä, Fenyvesi, Kankaanranta, Kenttälä, Merjovaara, Mäki-Kuutti, & Pavlysh, 2021). Therefore, in the present time, according to these developments, one of the most important things that should be paid attention to in learning approaches is the creation of attractive learning environments. This action can be achieved through the use of audio and video technologies as well as the use of concrete examples of content (Li & Huang, 2017). Therefore, to achieve greater effectiveness in learning outcomes in learning environments based on mobile technology, it is necessary to adopt and implement the best approaches that create attractive learning situations. In this regard, according to the successful experiences obtained from the implementation of the reverse approach in different countries, it is necessary to examine the components of this approach in our country in order to check the possibility of implementing this approach in mobile learning environments, so this research aims to The identification of the components of the learning environment based on mobile technology for the implementation of an effective flipped class has been done in a central research method. The current research was conducted qualitatively with a mixed research approach. In this research, after coding and selecting the main categories, in the next step, a combination of these categories was done, which led to the design of a conceptual framework in the field of mobile learning based on reverse learning. The selected statistical population includes researches conducted in the field of mobile learning based on reverse learning, and the criteria for entering the research was to be related to mobile learning, reverse learning, Persian and English from 2013 to 2023. The databases from which these articles were selected are: Mag-Iran database, Normagz, Civilica, Humanities Research Institute, Iran Profile and foreign databases Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, Eric, Springer and Google Scholar from 2013 to 2023. AD was for foreign research and 1391 to 1401 for internal research. Data analysis was done using inductive qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis, and after defining the analysis unit, categories were defined and the categories were coded, and after coding all the categories, the codings were evaluated and the data was extracted based on the coding. In this stage, 25 open codes were selected and in the last stage, which is the selection of the main (core) categories, 9 core categories were selected. After analyzing the articles, from the total information collected and coded, close categories were placed in a main category. In this stage, 25 codes were re-selected, and in the last stage, which is the selection of main (core) categories, 9 core categories were selected. The components of the mobile technology learning environment for implementing the flipped class include 9 main components (core category). The first component of training content: includes the content of reverse learning training. The second component of learning methods: including learner-centered experiences, learner activity, interaction with others, involvement, cooperative and team learning. The third component of information sharing: includes sharing and publishing information. The fourth component of content production: by the teacher including the ability to produce educational content, the skill of working with video production software. The fifth component of educational goals: including general and partial goals. The sixth component of learner evaluation: axis including task-based evaluation, evaluation based on real experiences, activity-based evaluation, self-evaluation. The seventh component of transferring education outside the classroom: including pre-class preparation and transferring lectures outside the classroom. The eighth component of mobility and portability: includes the sub-components of portability, expandability, mobility, portability, ubiquity. The ninth component of technological support: includes sub-components of technical issues, equipment, internet connection, infrastructure, technology and tools, technological gap, user interface. According to the results of the present research, it is suggested that teachers and professors design educational content in such a way that it can be taught in this approach to implement the flipped class based on mobile technology. It is also necessary to provide training and empowerment courses for professors and teachers in the field of using applied software for content production. It is also suggested to provide the necessary technological platform for the reverse learning environment in schools and universities. One of the limitations of the research is that the components of the learning environment based on mobile technology have not been externally validated in order to implement an effective reverse classroom, and external validation is necessary for its application.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Learning Environment
  • Mobile Technology
  • Mobile Phone
  • Mobile Learning
  • Effective Flipped Classroom
Ahadiat, M. R. (2019). The impact of flipped classroom on the level of learning and satisfaction with teaching method in electrical engineering students of Islamic Azad University. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 20(80), 51-69. doi: 10.22047/ijee.2019.149317.1580. [In Persian]
Ahmed, H. O. K. (2016). Flipped learning as a new educational paradigm: An analytical critical study. European Scientific Journal12(10), 417-444.
Banks, L., & Kay, R. (2022). Exploring flipped classrooms in undergraduate nursing and health science: a systematic review. Nurse Education in Practice, 103417. 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103417
Barana, A., & Marchisio, M. (2021). Analyzing interactions in automatic formative assessment activities for mathematics in digital learning environments.13th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2021) 10.5220/0010474004970504.
Barbour, C., & Schuessler, J. B. (2019). A preliminary framework to guide implementation of The Flipped Classroom Method in nursing education. Nurse Education in Practice34, 36-42. 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.001.
Barrios, T. A., Rojas, S. L., Movilla, J. S., Ibáñez, S. F. U., & Taboada, A. H. (2022). Characterization Of Flipped Classroom Model in Higher Education: A Perception from Educational Resilience During Covid-19 Pandemic. Procedia Computer Science203, 575-582. 10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.082
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery, Harvard Educational Review. 31 (1): 21–32.
Cheung, S. K., Phusavat, K., & Yang, H. H. (2021). Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-9. 10.1186/s41239-021-00254-1.
Clark, K. R. (2015). The Effects of the Flipped Model of Instruction on Student Engagement and Performance in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91-115.
Dehghanzadeh S., Jafaraghaie F., & Khordadi Astane H. (2018). The Effect of Flipped Classroom On Critical Thinking Disposition in Nursing Students. Iranian Journal of Medical Education,18 :39-48. [In Persian]
DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 1-11.
Elkhair & Abdul Mutalib, A. (2019). Mobile learning applications: characteristics, perspectives, and future trends. International Journal of Interactive Digital Media (IJIDM), 5(1), 18-21.
Eppard, J., & Rochdi, A. (2017). A Framework for Flipped Learning. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
Fagan, M. H. (2019). Factors influencing student acceptance of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in the Schools, 36(2), 105-121.
Golzari, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Teaching in reverse method in higher education: Narratives of a university lecturer, theory and practice in the 2015 curriculum; 4 (7): 136-81. [In Persian]
He, W., Holton, A., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016). The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptionsLearning and Instruction, 45, 61-71.
Jafaraghaie F., Dehghanzadeh S., & Khordadi-Astane H. (2017). Nursing students’ experience in a flipped classroom method . Quarterly journal of research in medical science education; 9 (1) :36-27. [In Persian]
Jia, C., Hew, K. F., Jiahui, D., & Liuyufeng, L. (2023). Towards a fully online flipped classroom model to support student learning outcomes and engagement: A 2-year design-based study. The Internet and Higher Education56, 100878.
Johnson, L., & Morris, P. (2010). Towards a framework for critical citizenship education. The curriculum journal, 21(1), 77-96.
Kampa, R. K. (2023). Combining technology readiness and acceptance model for investigating the acceptance of m-learning in higher education in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal.
Kaviani, H., Liaqat Dar, M J., Zamani, B., & Abedini, Y. (2018). The theoretical framework of the flipped classroom: drawing pointers for inclusive learning. Basics of Education Research Journal, 7(2), 59-78. [In Persian]
Kheirābādi, R. (2017). The impact of flipped classroom model on teaching English grammar at 10th grade of high school. Educational Innovations, 16(4), 141-162. [In Persian]
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
Li, X., & Huang, Z. J. (2017). An inverted classroom approach to educate MATLAB in chemical process control. Education for Chemical Engineers, 19, 1-12.
Lin, X., & Su, S. (2020). Chinese College Students' Attitude and Intention of Adopting Mobile Learning. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 16(2), 6-21.
Little, C. (2015). The flipped classroom in further education: literature review and case study. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 20(3), 265-279.
Lo, C. K. (2018). Grounding the flipped classroom approach in the foundations of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development66(3), 793-811.
Mäkelä, T., & Leinonen, T. (2021). Design framework and principles for learning environment co-design: Synthesis from literature and three empirical studies. Buildings, 11(12), 581.
Mäkelä, T., Fenyvesi, K., Kankaanranta, M., Kenttälä, V., Merjovaara, O., Mäki-Kuutti, M., & Pavlysh, E. V. (2021). Pedagogical framework, design principles, recommendations and guidelines for a STEM learning environment design. Tutkimusselosteita/Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos, (57).
Mirzaei, A., & Ahmadbeigi, F. (2020). The relationship between the use of mobile technology and problem-solving strategies in students of the Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Tehran North Branch. Journal of Knowledge Studies, 13(48), 89-99. [In Persian]
Moradi, R., Fazeli, M., & Hosseini, M. (2021). Analyzing and identifying the components of future learning environments and presenting a proposed framework for optimizing mobile learning in the post-corona era. The second national mobile learning conference in the age of Corona and post-corona, Allameh Tabatabai University. [In Persian]
OECD. (2021). Building the future of education. Secretary-General of the OECD.
Rajaiyan, N., Keshti Arai, N., & Nadi, M A. (2017). Designing a training course on water consumption behavior based on reverse learning method (qualitative research). Teaching Research, 6(4), 166-188. [In Persian]
Rouah, I., Bourekkadi, S., Khoulji, S., Slimani, K., & Kerkeb, M. L. (2021). Mobile Learning Driving the Development of Higher Education Through a New Vision of Teaching Methods Thanks to Educational Technology. Ilkogretim Online, 20(5). doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.106.
Soleymāni, S., Aliābādi, K., Zāre’i Zavāraki, I., & Delāvar, A. (2022). Designing and validating a flipped learning pattern based on problem-oriented teaching approach of the English course. Educational Innovations, 21(2), 81-104. doi: 10.22034/jei.2022.292844.1988. [In Persian]
Tahmasebi, F., Ahghar, G., & Ahmadi, A. (2019). Design and validation of the reverse learning pattern of entrepreneurial lessons and Its effectiveness is on self-directed learning and collaborative learning. Educational Administration Research, 11(41), 35-55. [In Persian]
Wehling, J., Volkenstein, S., Dazert, S., Wrobel, C., van Ackeren, K., Johannsen, K., & Dombrowski, T. (2021). Fast-track flipping: flipped classroom framework development with open-source H5P interactive tools. BMC Medical Education21(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02784-8.
Youhasan, P., Chen, Y., Lyndon, M. P., & Henning, M. A. (2022). University teachers' perceptions of readiness for flipped classroom pedagogy in undergraduate nursing education: A qualitative study. Journal of Professional Nursing41, 26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.04.001.