بررسی رابطه میان خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و اشتیاق تحصیلی با توجه به نقش میانجی خودتنظیمی در میان دانشجویان رشته زبان انگلیسی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، کرمانشاه، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه زبان انگلیسی و زبانشناسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

https://www.doi.org/10.34785/J012.2022.004

چکیده

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی رابطه بین خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و اشتیاق تحصیلی با توجه به نقش میانجی خودتنظیمی در میان دانشجویان کارشناسی رشته زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه کردستان در سال تحصیلی 99/98 بود. جامعه‌ی آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی رشته زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه کردستان به تعداد 423 نفر بود که با استفاده از جدول کرجسی و مورگان و با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی تعداد 203 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه‌ی پژوهش انتخاب شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌های پژوهش، از پرسشنامه‌های خودکارآمدی تحصیلی جینکز و مورگان؛ اشتیاق تحصیلی فردریکز و همکاران؛ و پرسشنامه خودتنظیمی بوفارد و همکاران استفاده شد و داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS و AMOS مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که مدل از برازش مطلوبی برخوردار است و تمامی ضرایب مسیر معنی‌دار بوده است (t ≥ 1.96; P ≤ 0.01). بر اساس نتایج، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی با ضرایب 0.47 و 0.69 به ترتیب اشتیاق تحصیلی و خودتنظیمی را به‌طور مستقیم تبیین می‌کند؛ و خودتنظیمی با ضریب اثر 0.62 به‌طور مستقیم بر اشتیاق تحصیلی اثرگذار است. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که ضریب مسیر تبیین شده‌ی رابطه‌ی خودکارآمدی تحصیلی با اشتیاق تحصیلی با نقش میانجی خودتنظیمی به‌صورت غیرمستقیم با ضریب 0.42 معنی‌دار بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating The Relationship Between Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Enthusiasm With Regard To The Mediating Role of Self-Regulation Among English Language Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yaser Sayadi 1
  • Habib Soleimani 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of English and Linguistics, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract                                                         
Over the past two decades, the application of the concept of academic enthusiasm has become very common; Because one of the important factors in students' academic achievement is academic enthusiasm. Enthusiasm as a result of participation in education occurs when knowledge and learning are valued and applied by the student. Enthusiasm is the interaction of energy and time students devote to educational activities. Enthusiasm refers to a student's commitment or investment in learning activities and is more than a transient emotional state, it refers to a contagious, emotional-cognitive state of focus that focuses on a particular subject, event, or behavior. This concept has been proposed as a meta-concept that includes behaviors, cognitions, and emotions. Academic enthusiasm increases students' awareness of university, strengthens their effort and energy to learn, and allows them to explore different learning processes and their future. One of the important psychological variables that can increase the effect of enthusiasm is academic self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is one of the cognitive-motivational strategies that includes judging people about their ability to organize and execute a series of tasks to achieve certain types of performance and play an effective role in determining the level of student effort in learning activities. Another important factor that can affect academic enthusiasm is self-regulation. Self-regulatory skills focus on the role of the individual in the learning process and include strategies that students use to adjust their cognitions. Students' self-regulatory skills are affected by self-efficacy; and can increase academic enthusiasm. Thus, students' self-regulation can play a mediating role in the relationship between self-efficacy and academic enthusiasm. Therefore, the present study intends to examine the effect of self-efficacy on academic enthusiasm by considering the mediating role of self-regulatory in students of English as a foreign language at University of Kurdistan.
The method of the present study is quantitative which was analyzed with practical purposes using structural equation modeling (SEM) technique and maximum likelihood method. The statistical population included all students of English as a foreign language at University of Kurdistan in the academic year 2019-2020. The research sample was selected based on Krejcie and Morgan table using random sampling method. In the data collection stage, 289 questionnaires were collected from which 16 questionnaires were excluded in the analysis process due to deficiencies in completing the questionnaires and having missing data. Finally, 273 questionnaires were analyzed as the final data. The instrument used in the present study was a questionnaire. To measure academic self-efficacy, the Jinks and Morgan Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, which had 30 items and three subscales of talent, context, and effort. The Cronbach's alpha obtained for the present questionnaire was 0.61. To measure academic enthusiasm, Fredricks et al.'s Student Enthusiasm Questionnaire, which had 15 items and three subscales of behavioral, emotional and cognitive, was used and Cronbach's alpha obtained for this questionnaire was 0.73. To assess self-regulation skills, Bouffard et al.'s self-regulatory questionnaire which has 14 items and has three subscales of cognitive, metacognitive and motivational, was used and the Cronbach's alpha value obtained for this questionnaire was 0.63. SPSS software version 23 was used for descriptive reporting of the data and AMOS software version 23 was used to test the relationships between variables.
The results of the present study showed that the chi-square on the degree of freedom (CMIN/DF) is 1.39; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is 0.044; The root mean square residual (RMR) is 0.055; The normed fit index (NFI) is 0.937; Incremental fit index (IFI) is 0.981; Tucker - Lewis index (TLI) is 0.971; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) is 0.981; The Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI) is 0.624; And the Parsimony Comparative Fit Index (PCFI) is 0.654. These results indicate the acceptable fit of the model with the research data, and the conceptual model of the research is confirmed. Moreover, the results of the significance test of path coefficients indirectly and as a total effect showed that the explained path coefficient of the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic enthusiasm with the role of indirect self-regulatory mediator is significant with a coefficient of 0.42 and total effectiveness with a coefficient of 0.89.
Explaining the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic enthusiasm, it can be stated that since enthusiasm among students causes them to grow in the framework of scientific activities and get rid of negative situations such as academic reluctance, so self-efficacy has a positive effect over academic enthusiasm and is a factor for planning and controlling students in order to maintain and prevent distraction from doing homework. Explaining the relationship between academic self-efficacy and self-regulation, it can be stated that according to Bandura theory of self-efficacy, students who feel that learning ability is acquired are more internally aroused and show higher levels of self-efficacy in learning situations. High self-efficacy can provide the ground for the application of high-level cognitive strategies (such as metacognitive self-regulation), because engaging in self-regulation requires empowering oneself, having a lot of perseverance and patience, and a desire to stay in task. Explaining the relationship between self-regulation and academic motivation, it can be said that students who have self-regulatory skills in dealing with problems are independent, self-taught and able to use a variety of learning strategies and show more enthusiasm in university. Therefore, in order to increase the enthusiasm in the university, students can increase their self-regulation skills.
Therefore, by paying more attention to students' enthusiasm for university and promoting students' enthusiasm for university and education, it is possible to have a positive effect on students' academic success in their academic levels. In fact, academic enthusiasm as an important factor and driving force to drive students is very effective on the success and academic success of students, which can be improved based on self-efficacy and strengthening self-regulation skills. In other words, paying attention to the improvement of students' self-efficacy skills will lead to the improvement of their academic enthusiasm and ultimately improve the progress and academic success of students. So, efforts should be focused on the importance of paying more attention to academic enthusiasm as an important and effective factor that has a significant impact on students' academic progress. This important factor, academic enthusiasm, can be improved through self-efficacy and self-regulation. In cases where these two factors of self-efficacy and self-regulation are combined, they will have a higher impact and role in improving academic enthusiasm.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Academic Self-Efficacy
  • Self-Regulation
  • Academic Enthusiasm
  • English Language Students

مراجع

Abbasi, M., Dargahi, S., Pirani, Z., & Bonyadi, F. (2015). The role of procrastination and motivational self-regulation in predicting students' academic achievement. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 15 (1): 160-16 (in Persian).
Ahmadi, G. A., Ozaei, N., & Goodarzi, M. (2019). The role of self-regulated learning strategies, academic engagement and academic achievement in predicting students' academic achievement. Bimonthly Journal of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 12 (5): 19-28 (in Persian).
Alfred, M., Neyens, D. M., & Gramopadhye, A. K. (2019). Learning in simulated environments: An assessment of 4-week retention outcomes. Applied Ergonomics, 74:107-117.
Atarodi, M., &  Karsheki, H. (2013). The role of dimensions of perfectionism and goal orientation in predicting students' self-regulation. Knowledge and research in applied psychology, 14(52), 100-108.
Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). “It gives you that sense of hope”: An exploration of technology use to mediate student engagement with mathematics. Heliyon, 6(1), e02945.
Babai Amiri N., & Ashouri J. (2014). The relationship between cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies, self-efficacy, creativity and emotional intelligence with academic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning; 2(3):93-108 (in Persian).
Barzegar Befrooi, K., & Saadipour, I. (2012). Modeling the relationships between epistemological beliefs, academic self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation, and in-depth processing with high school students' academic performance. Cognitive Science News. 14 (1): 53-66 (in Persian).
Bitsika, V., Sharpley, C. F., & Peters, K. (2010). How is resilience associated with anxiety and depression? Analysis of factor score interactions within a homogeneous sample. German journal of psychiatry, 13(1), 9-16.
Bondarenko, I. (2017). The role of positive emotions and type of feedback in self-regulation of learning goals achievement: experimental research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 405-411.
Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self‐regulation and performance among college students. British journal of educational psychology, 65(3), 317-329.
Caraway, K., Tucker, C. M., Reinke, W. M., & Hall, C. (2003). Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 417-427.
Cole, J., Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2011). Social exclusion, personal control, self-regulation, and stress among substance abuse treatment clients. Drug and alcohol dependence, 113(1), 13-20.
Debicki, B., Kellermanns, F., Barnett, T., Pearson, A., & Pearson A. (2016). Beyond the Big Five: The mediating role of goal orientation in the relationship between core self-evaluations and academic performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 14:273-285.
Dehghanizadeh, M. H., & Hossein Chari, M. (2012). Academic vitality and perception of family communication pattern; the mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Teaching and Learning Studies, 4 (2), 21-47 (in Persian).
Ebrahimi, S., Pakdaman, S., & Hossein Pour, S., (2016). Predicting learning regulation based on academic self-efficacy and interest in reading through the mediation of information processing strategies. Research in Curriculum Planning, 13 (48), 156-165 (in Persian).
Eslami, M. A., Dortaj, F., Saadipour, I., & Delavar, A. (2018). Modeling on academic motivation; Based on supported academic performance, self-esteem and academic self-efficacy in undergraduate students of Amirkabir University of Tehran. Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 6 (10), 57-75 (in Persian).
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
Galla, B. M., Wood, J. J., Tsukayama, E., Har, K., Chiu, A. W., & Langer, D. A. (2014). A longitudinal multilevel model analysis of the within-person and betweenperson effect of effortful engagement and academic self-efficacy on academic performance. Journal of School Psychology, 52(3): 295-308.
Garcia, R., Falkner, K., & Vivian, R. (2018). Systematic literature review: self-regulated learning strategies using e-learning tools for computer science. Computers & Education, 123:150-163.
Hu, P. M., & Bentler, L. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structural equation modeling: Sensitivity to underparametrized model misspicication, Psychological models, 3, 424-453.
Hu, P. M., & Bentler, L. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criterai versus new alternatives, Structural equation modeling, 6, 1-55.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). Development and Validation of Scores on the Distributed Leadership. Inventory Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 6, 1013-1034, DOI: 10.1177/0013164409344490.
Jamali, M., Noroozi, A., & Tahmasebi, R. (2013). Factors Affecting Academic Self-Efficacy and Its Association with Academic Achievment among Students of Bushehr University Medical Sciences 2012-13. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 13 (8):629-641.
Javadi Elmi, L., Asadzadeh, H., Dortaj, F., & Delavar, Ali. (2020). Modeling the structural relationships of students' academic motivation based on transformational teaching, academic self-efficacy mediated by the role of academic vitality. Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 8 (14), 1-19 (in Persian).
Jinks, J., & Morgan, V. (1999). Children's perceived academic self-efficacy: An inventory scale. The clearing house, 72(4), 224-230.
Khoroshi, P., Nili, M. R., & Abedi, A. (2014). The relationship between emotional and cognitive desire for learning and students' self-efficacy; Isfahan Farhangian University. Journal of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 7 (4): 229-234 (in Persian).
Kitsantas, A., Winsler, A., & Huie, F. (2008). Selfregulation and ability predictors of academic success during college: A predictive validity study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(1), 42-68.
Klassen, R. M. (2010). Confidence to manage learning: The self-efficacy for self-regulated learning of early adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 19-30.
Klassen, R. M., Krawchuk, L. L., & Rajani, S. (2008). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 915-931.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Larrain, A., Freire, P., López, P., & Grau, V. (2019). Counter-Arguing During Curriculum-Supported Peer Interaction Facilitates Middle-School Students’ Science Content Knowledge. Cognition and Instruction, 37(4), 453-482.
Lavasani, G. A., Ejei, M., & Davoodi, J. (2013). The effect of teaching self-regulatory learning strategies on self-regulatory skills, academic engagement and test anxiety. Journal of Psychology, 17 (2); (66). 169-181 (in Persian).
Lavasani, M. G., Ejei, M., & Afshari, M. (2009). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic engagement with academic achievement. Journal of Psychology. 13 (3), 289-305 (in Persian).
Mousavi, M., Hashemi, S., Yazdi, S. A. A., Soltani, I., Ahmadi, Z., Khanzadeh, M., & Kikhawani, S. (2013). Predicting academic procrastination based on emotional intelligence components. Journal of Medical Sciences of Ilam University. 21 (4): 21-29 (in Persian).
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 6, 1213-1233.
Nasri, S., Saleh Sedghpour, B., & Cheraghian Radi, M. (2014). Structural equation of modeling the relationship between self-efficacy and metacognition with problem solving appraisal. Journal of School Psychology, 3(3), 106-121 (in Persian).
Niroumand Ali, & Babalu, F. (2018). The relationship between academic excitement, academic self-efficacy and academic resilience with students' academic motivation. Master Thesis in Educational Psychology. Mohaghegh Ardabili University. (in Persian).
Olson, M., & Hergenhahn, B, R. (2019). Introduction to Learning Theories. Ali Akbar Seif (Translator). Publisher: Doran (in Persian).
Saadat, S., Asghari, F., & Jazayeri, R. (2015). The relationship between academic self-efficacy with perceived stress, coping strategies and perceived social support among students of University of Guilan. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 15: 67-78 (in Persian).
Salmela-Aro, K., Tolvanen, A., & Nurmi, J. E. (2009). Achievement strategies during university studies predict early career burnout and engagement. Journal of vocational behavior, 75(2), 162-172.
Samavi, S., & Najjarpourian, S. (2019). The Causal Relationship between Internal Motivation, Academic Engagement and Academic Self-Regulation with Academic Performance mediated by Self-Directed Learning in High School Students in Bandar Abbas. Journal of cognitive strategies in learning, 7(12), 47-68 (in Persian).
Sedláček, M., & Šeďova, K. (2020). Are student engagement and peer relationships connected to student participation in classroom talk?. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 26, 100411.
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., & Salamounova, Z. (2019). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101217.
Shafiee Sarvestani, M., & Askari, S. (2019). Investigating the relationship between academic self-regulation and enthusiasm in the sixth-grade students' school in Shiraz. Educational Research, 5 (19), 47-59 (in Persian).
Shirazi Tehrani, A. R., Ghazanfari, F., & Javadani, M. (2015). Relationship between goal orientation, self-regulated learning and students' academic performance. Review in Educational Sciences Education, 2015 (1), 34-42 (in Persian).
Skibbe, L. E., Montroy, J. J., Bowles, R. P., & Morrison, F. J. (2019). Self-regulation and the development of literacy and language achievement from preschool through second grade. Early childhood research quarterly, 46, 240-251.
Stefansson, K. K., Gestsdottir, S., Birgisdottir, F., & Lerner, R. M. (2018). School engagement and intentional selfregulation: A reciprocal relation in adolescence. Journal of adolescence, 64, 23-33.
Taheri, M., & Mansouri, L. (2018), The effectiveness of self-efficacy training on self-esteem and academic motivation of female students with exam anxiety, the second conference of science and technology of psychology, educational sciences and sociology of Iran, Tehran, and three development-oriented conferences Sam Iranian Science and Technology, https://www.civilica.com/Paper-OSCONF02-OSCONF02_186.html (in Persian).
Tenaw, Y. A. (2015). Relationship between Self-Efficacy, Academic Achievement and Gender in Analytical Chemistryat Debre Markos College of Teacher Education”. Debre Markos College of Teacher Education. ISSN: 2227-5835, 3(1), 1-28.
Ugwn, F. O., Onyishi, I. E., & Tyoyima, W. A. (2013). Exploring the relationships between academic burnout, self-efficacy and academic engagement among Nigerian college students. The African Symposium: An online journal of the African Educational Research Network, 13(2): 37-45.
Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16-26.
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79-93.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 179.
Zahed, A., Karimi Yousefi, S. H., & Moeini Kia, M. (2015). Relationship between quality of work life and self-efficacy with desire for school among female students. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 9 (4), 25-42 (in Persian).
Zangiabadi, M., Sadeghi, M., & Ghadampour, E. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching self-regulatory strategies on academic self-efficacy and academic adjustment of maladapted students. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 13 (44), 71-87 (in Persian).
Ziegler, N., & Opdenakker, M. C. (2018). The development of academic procrastination in first-year secondary education students: The link with metacognitive self-regulation, selfefficacy, and effort regulation. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 71-82.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 145-155.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2004). Self-regulating intellectual processes and outcomes: A social cognitive perspective. Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development, 323-349.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار