اقتصادسنجی آموزش عالی رویکردی نوین برای ارزیابی تناسب تدریس و تحقیق اعضای هیأت علمی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استاد اقتصاد آموزش دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

https://www.doi.org/10.34785/J012.2022.012

چکیده

چکیده
رابطۀ بین تدریس و تحقیق اعضای هیأت علمی عمدتاً به صورت هنجاری و تک‌بعدی مطالعه شده است. هدف اصلی این مقاله، ضمن بازنمایی این مسائل کلیدی، معرفی روش پُر قابلیتی مبتنی بر مرز امکانات تولید می‌باشد که به‌طور همزمان امکان شناسایی و تحلیل سه وضعیت مکمل، جانشینی و/یا خنثی بودن رابطه تدریس و تحقیق را داشته و زمینه فنی لازم برای ارزیابی درجۀ متناسب بودن فعالیت‎های دانشگاهی را فراهم می‏نماید. نمونه آماری تحقیق شامل 716 عضو هیأت علمی می‎باشد که به‎ صورت خوشه‎ای از اعضای یک دانشگاه جامع انتخاب و داده‌های عملکرد آموزشی و پژوهشی آنان برای سال تحصیلی 96-1395 گردآوری شده است. یافته‌های تجربی نشان دادند که رابطه بین آموزش و پژوهش اعضای هیأت علمی چند بُعدی و بسته به شرایط نهادی-سازمانی، متفاوت می‎باشد، به‌طوری‌که  وضعیت عملکرد 402 نفر در منطقه جانشینی و 314 نفر در منطقه مکملی قرار داشته است. بر این اساس، ترکیب عملکرد آموزشی و پژوهشی 314 نفر نامتناسب شناسایی شده، لذا در بازتخصیص منابع و تلاش‌ها برای حصول به ترکیب مناسب، 27 نفر باید فعالیت‌های آموزشی و 287 نفر فعالیت‌های پژوهشی خود را افزایش دهند. از این رو، روش اقتصادسنجی آموزش عالی، ابزار علمی-فنی پُر قابلیتی برای واکاوی و ارزیابی ارتباط مورد اشاره و درجۀ متناسب بودن فعالیت‌ها با رویکرد اثباتی و نظریه‌محور می‎باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Higher Education Econometrics as a New Approach To Evaluating The Nexus Between Academic Teaching And Research

نویسنده [English]

  • Abolghasem Naderi
Professor of Economics of Education at the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Existing research into the nexus between academic teaching and research which has a long history, is mainly normative and identifies just a single dimensional relationship of the nexus, that is complementarity or substitutivity. After critically examining and highlighting the shortcomings as such, this article aims to develop a new and capable approach based on production-possibility frontier that recognizes and takes into consideration the three aspects of complementarity, substitutivity and neutrality involved in the relationship between teaching and research of faculty members. Study population of the current research is university academic staff out of whom 716 persons from a comprehensive university in Iran have been selected through clustering sampling. Data on teaching and research performance of the sample have been collected for the 2015-16 academic year adopting the promotion by-law of academic staff methodology and indicators. Using the approach which is based on the education production-possibility frontier named as Higher Education Econometric Approach, we showed that the nexus between teaching and research is multidimensional and heterogenous across different institutions and organizations.
The findings drawn from analyzing the data, using the new approach which simultaneously includes all dimensions of the nexus, show that 402 persons’ activities of 716 staff were located in substitutivity region of the production-possibility frontier, and 314 persons’ activities in complementarity region. Hence, the activities of 44 percent of sampled staff are located in the region within which their activity combination was identified as inappropriate. Thus, the teaching-research combination of academic staff of the university needs to change through reallocating their efforts and resources to achieve the appropriate combination. In addition, for the case of the university, 27 staff should reallocate their economic resources (i.e., time, efforts, funds,…) in favor of increasing their teaching activities and in contrast, 287 staff are to increase their research activities. In conclusion and in contrast to the conventional regression analysis, the new approach of higher education econometrics based on the education production-possibility frontier is powerful and capable enough to identify all aspects of the nexus and capable of examining the appropriateness of teaching-research activity combination by applying a positive and theoretical-based approach. The empirical results also provide important policy implications to reallocate resources at both individual and organizational levels.
Individuals can use the results to reallocate their limited resources especially time and efforts towards achieving more appropriate combination of teaching and research during their academic career. Universities and colleges should also apply such important findings in their faculty development plans and policies which would significantly contribute to the improvement of organizational productivity and efficiency. Nonetheless, there is a great degree of heterogeneity in the relationship between teaching and research across various disciplines and different educational levels which merits further empirical research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Academic staff
  • Teaching-research nexus
  • Performance
  • Complementarity and substitutivity
  • Higher education production-possibility frontier

مراجع

Abdollahi, H. (2008). An Introduction on Teaching Methods, Techniques, and Skills. Tehran: Allame Tabatabaee University Press. (In Persian)
Barkhoda, S. J., & Ahmadhaidar, P. (2021). Representation of Students' Experiences of the Challenges and Problems of Teaching Professors in Cyberspace. Journal of Research in Teaching, 9(1), 37-89. (In Persian)
Barnett, R. (1992). Linking Teaching and Research, A Critical Inquiry. Journal of Higher Education, 63(6), 619-636.
Becker, W. E. and Kennedy, P. E. (2005). Does Teaching Enhance Research in Economics? Economic Review, 95(2), 172-176.
Becker, W. E., Jr. (1975). The University Professor as a Utility Maximizer and a Producer of Learning, Research, and Income. Journal of Human Resources, 10(Winter), 107-115.
Braxton, J. M. (ed.) (1996). Faculty Teaching and Research: Is there a Conflict? New Directions for Institutional Research, No 90, Vol XVIII, Number 2.
Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and Research: New Relationships and their Implications for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 3-18.
Coate, K., Barnett, R., & Williams, G. (2001). Relationships between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(2), 158–174.
Colbeck, C.L. (1998). Merging in a Seemless Blend: How Faculty Integrate Teaching and Research. Journal of Higher Education, 69(6), 647-671.
Del Rey, Elena (2001). Teaching versus Research: A Model of State University Competition. Journal of Urban Economics 49, 356–373. 
Ehrenberg, Ronald G. (2003). Studying Ourselves: The Academic Labor Market. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(2), 267-287.
Elsen, Mariken (G.M.F.), Visser-Wijnveen, Gerda J., van der Rijst, Roeland M., & van Driel, Jan H. (2009). How to Strengthen the Connection between Research and Teaching in Undergraduate University Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(1, January), 64–85.
Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality versus Competition in Academia. Sociology of Education, 65(October), 293-305.
Friedman, Lee S. (1985). Microeconomic Policy Analysis. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Gander, James P., & Tsui, Lisa (1999). Faculty Gender Effects on Academic Research and Teaching Courses and Instruction Affecting Critical Thinking. Research in Higher Education, 40 (2, April), 171-184. 
Gautier, Axel, and Wauthy, Xavier (2007). Teaching versus Research: A multi-tasking Approach to Multi-department Universities. European Economic Review 51, 273–295.
Ghorchian, N., & Jamshidi Avanaki, M. (2004). A Model to Determine Faculty Workload in Iran’s Higher Education System. Tehran: Metacognition Thought Press. (In Persian)
Gottlieb, E. E., & Keith, B. (1997). The Academic Research-Teaching Nexus in Eight Advanced-Industrialized Countries. Higher Education, 34, 397–420.
Grant, Kevin, and Fitzgerald, Stuart (2009). The Nexus between Teaching and Research: A Qualitative Study Using two Focus Group on Academic Information Systems Teachers. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 3(1), 37-56.
Halliwell, J. (2008). The Nexus of Teaching and Research: Evidence and Insights from the Literature. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
Hattie, J., & Marsh, H.W. (1996). The Relationship between Teaching and Research: A Meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, (Winter), 507-542.
Hattie, J., & Marsh, H.W. (2004). One Journey to Unravel the Relationship between Research and Teaching. “RESEARCH AND TEACHING: CLOSING THE DIVIDE? AN INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM”. Marwell Conference Centre, Colden Common, Winchester, Hampshire, SO21 1JH, 18-19 March 2004.
Healey, Mick (2005). Linking Research and Teaching: Exploring Disciplinary Spaces and the Role of Inquiry-based Learning. In: Barnett, R (ed.) (2005) Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching. McGraw Hill / Open University Press, 67-78.
Hopkins, David S. P. (1990). The Higher Education Production Function: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Findings. In: Hoenack, Stephen A. and Collins, Eileen L. (eds.) The Economics of American Universities: Management, Operations, and Fiscal Environment. State University of New York Press. 
Jafari Thani, H., & Keramati, O. (2012). A Study of Faculty Members’ Attitude about the Relationship between their Research and Teaching Activities. J. of Research and Planning in HE., 18 (2), 1-17. (In Persian)
Jenkins, Alan, Healey, Mick, and Zetter, Roger (2007). Linking Research and Teaching in Disciplines and Departments. The Higher Education Academy – April 2007, York.
Jordan, S. M. (1994). What we have Learned about Faculty Workload: The best Evidence. In: J. F. Wergin (Ed.), Analyzing Faculty Workload. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 83, pp. 15-24. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kershaw, Joseph A., & Mood, Alex M. (1970). Resource Allocation in Higher Education. The American Economic Review, 60(2, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May), 341-346.
Layzell, D. T. (1996). Faculty Workload and Productivity: Recurrent Issues with new Imperatives. Review of Higher Education, 19(3), 267-282.
Marsh, H., W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness: Complementary, Antagonistic, or Independent Constructs, Journal of Higher Education, 73(5, September/October), 603-641.
McLinden, Michael, Edwards, Corony, Garfield, Joy, and Moron-Garcia, Sue (2015). Strengthening the Links between Research and Teaching: Cultivating Student Expectations of Research-informed Teaching Approaches. Education in Practice, 2(1, November), 24-29.
Mohammadi, F. (2010). Impact of Evaluating Faculty Performance Using Smart Profile on Performance Improvement. J. of ICT in Education, 1, 5-22. (In Persian)
Naderi, A. (2007). Educational Comparative-Efficient Evaluation: Capabilities and Challenges. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of Internal Evaluation of University Quality. Quality Assessment Center of University of Tehran. (In Persian)
Naderi, A. (2018). Advanced Topics in Economics of Education: Internal Efficiency and Effectiveness. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (In Persian)
Naderi, A. (2019). Advanced Topics in Economics of Education: External Efficiency and Effectiveness. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (In Persian)
Naderi, A. (2022). Efficiency Measurement of Higher Education Units Using Multilevel Frontier Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 57, 79–92. (In Persian)
Neumann, Ruth (1992). Perceptions of the Teaching-Research Nexus: A Framework for Analysis. Higher Education, 23(2, Cumulative Index of Higher Education 1972-1990; Mar., 1992), 159-171.
Porter, Stephen R., & Umbach, Paul D. (2001). Analyzing Faculty Workload Data Using Multilevel Modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 171-196.
Rakhshani, M., & Shams, A. (2014). The Relationship between Research and Teaching Performance of Faculty Members and Students Academic Progress of Faculty of Agriculture at Zanjan University, Iran. Agricultural Education Administration Research, 31, 21-31. (In Persian)
Robertson, J. (2007). Beyond the ‘Research-Teaching’ Nexus: Exploring the Complexity of Academic Experience. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 541–56.
Salehi Omran, E., & Ghanavati, L. (2010). A Survey of Faculty Member's Teaching Load at Mazanderan University. Education and Psychology Studies, 2, 5-28. (In Persian)
Salimi, J., Ghasemi, M., & Abdi, A. (2019). Emerging Challenges in Iranian Higher Education and Presenting a Conceptual Model: The study of Grounded Theory. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 12(2), 127-156.  (In Persian)
Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. (2008). Research-led Teaching: Moving from a Fractured Engagement to a Marriage of Convenience, in Engaging Communities, Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference, Rotorua, 1-4 July 2008, 307-317.
Shafiee, F.S. (2018). Developing a Model of Appropriate Combination of Teaching and Research Academic Faculty at the University of Tehran. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
Shafiee, F.S., Naderi, A., Abili, K., & Sobhani, H. (2018). Analyzing and Explaining the Research Performance of Faculty Members with Mixed Approach and Multilevel Modeling: Case Study of University of Tehran. J. of Educational Planning Studies, 7(13), 97-120. (In Persian)
Shore, Bruce, Pinker, Susan, and Bates, Mary (1990). Research as a Model for University Teaching. Higher Education, 19, 21-35.
Sponken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can Inquiry-based Learning Strengthen the Links between Teaching and Disciplinary Research? Studies in Higher Education, 356(6), 723–740.
Tang, T., & Chamberlain, M. (1997). Attitudes toward Research and Teaching: Differences between Administrators and Faculty Members, the Journal of Higher Education, 68(2), 212-227.
Turk, Marko, and Ledić, Jasminka (2016). Between Teaching and Research: Challenges of the Academic Profession in Croatia. c e p s Journal 6(1), 95-111.
Vardi, Iris (2009). The Impacts of Different Types of Workload Allocation Models on Academic Satisfaction and Working Life. Higher Education, 57(4, April), 499-508.
تدریس پژوهی
دوره 10، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 31
فروردین 1401
صفحه 322-297

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار