واکاوی عوامل موثر بر ترک‌تحصیل دختران روستایی با رویکرد مبتنی بر نظریه داده بنیاد: مورد استان کردستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی،دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 مدرس مدعو گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

یکی از مسائل مشهود در برخی از نواحی روستایی کشور، عدم تحصیل یا ترک تحصیل دختران روستایی است. موضوعی که چالش آور و بغرنج است. چرا که فرد از تحصیل و کسب پیشرفت های متعاقب زندگی محروم می ماند.
پژوهش حاضر با هدف مطالعه عوامل موثر بر ترک تحصیل دختران در مدارس مناطق روستایی (کلاترزان و موچش) استان کردستان به انجام رسید. از روش کیفی مبتنی بر نظریه داده بنیاد استفاده شد. افراد مشارکت‌کننده 19 دانش آموز دختر که به‌صورت هدفمند و ملاک محور انتخاب بر مبنای شاخص اشباع نظری مطالعه شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها مصاحبه نیمه‌سازمان‌یافته بود. بعد از پیاده‌سازی متن مصاحبه‌های کیفی و استخراج دیدگاه مصاحبه‌شوندگان، محتوای متون مصاحبه ها براساس شیوه کد گذاری (باز، محوری و انتخابی) تحلیل شد. برای اعتبار و روایی داده ها از دو روش بازبینی مشارکت کنندگان و مرور خبرگان غیر شرکت کننده در پژوهش استفاده شد.
یافته‌های پژوهش از 7 مقوله اثرگذار بر ترک‌تحصیل دختران روستایی حکایت دارد که شامل عوامل اقتصادی و معیشتی، عوامل محیط آموزشی، تعاملات معلم و شاگردان، ساختار معیوب خانواده، زمینه های فرهنگی و ارزشی، آسیب های تحصیلی و نگرش منفی به کارکرد سواد است، که در قالب عوامل علی، مداخله ای و زمینه ای راهبرد ها و پیامد ها بصورت مدل نهایی ارائه شده است. درنتیجه ضعف این عوامل که موجب ترک تحصیل دختران شده، بهبود عوامل استنتاجی از یافته های این پژوهش که در قالب مدلی ارائه شده است، پیشنهاد می شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating Factors Affecting on Dropout of Rural Girls Based on Grounded Theory Approach: Case of Kurdistan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Anvar Shahmohammadi 1
  • Mehri Bahmani 2
1 Assistant Professor Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Visiting Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The acquisition of knowledge is the starting point of human development and the move of societies towards sustainable development. That is why in today's societies with lower education rates, they face more problems and their progress is slower. Access to education and continuing education is one of the challenges facing many girls in Iran, especially in rural areas. One of the prominent issues in some rural areas of the country is the lack of education or dropout of rural girls. It's a challenging and complicated subject. Because one is deprived of education and the subsequent development of life. Addressing disadvantaged areas to improve the general conditions of girls and women is a top priority for all communities. At the national level, the transition from elementary to middle school is 90% for boys and 80% for girls. Cultural barriers also prevent girls from continuing their education after elementary school. Women in rural areas also face challenges. In urban areas, the literacy rate of women is about 82 percent, while in rural areas it is about 62 percent. Other challenges include lack of broad participation, lack of access to information, knowledge and resources, domestic violence, and low levels of participation in development programs. One of the criteria for growth and development is literacy and equitable distribution of equal educational opportunities and opportunities among different segments of society in order to achieve educational justice. Given the importance of educating women and girls, identifying the factors that influence education in this area may be incomplete for future generations. Investing in girls' education is not only a moral necessity, but a very important one in the development of the country.
The present study was a qualitative research in which the conceptual model of the factors influencing the desertion of rural girl’s qualitative method based on Grounded Theory was used. Participants in the study were middle and high school dropout girls in the villages of Clatterzan and Mouchesh. The reason for choosing them as the research community was that because of their dropout experience, they all had a more tangible and closer relationship with the factors influencing their dropout. They had girls. So, based on their experiences and perspectives, we can have a more realistic understanding of these factors. For this purpose, criterion and purposeful sampling method were used to evaluate the opinions of the sample members. The criterion for selection was mainly the girls' dropout experience and then the purposeful selection of those who volunteered to participate in the study. The sample size was 19 according to the theoretical saturation of the data, and the process of selecting participants continued until theoretical saturation. The research tool consisted of semi-structured interviews in order to gain insight into the opinions of the study participants. The interview was asked a broad general question such as "What was the reason for leaving school" and then exploratory questions such as "Please explain more" were asked to encourage participants and gain more in-depth information. Interviews ranged from 20 to 60 minutes. Data were analyzed by triple coding method. Finally, the findings were shared with some of the participants in order to assess the final validity, and to assure the reliability of this process, a faculty reviewer with experience of qualitative work was used.
The findings of the study indicate 7 factors affecting the education of rural girls, including Economic and livelihood factors, educational environment factors, teacher-student interactions, defective family structure, cultural and value backgrounds, academic impairments, and negative attitudes toward literacy function that in the form of causal, intervention and contextual factors, strategies and outcomes are presented as the final model. First, there are economic and livelihood challenges. Factors that can be addressed by entering into adulthood and employment or marrying girls and renouncing public or university education. Challenges such as financial poverty, livelihoods, low income, lack of education, family need, and seasonality of family income are some of the factors that have been effective in dropping out of rural girls. The second category is the cultural and value attitudes of the parents that have been influenced by the causal factors of the dropout phenomenon along with the causal factors. Components such as poor parental supervision, paying attention to the preference of being a housewife, marrying over education, not allowing girls to continue their education in nearby villages, early puberty, the taboo of male teachers, fear of moral hazards Being mixed with boys and girls, the girl's perception of women is one of the components mentioned by the study subjects. The third category is that the educational environment, teacher-pupil interactions, and the defective family structure as interfering factors have also influenced the phenomenon of rural girls leaving school alongside causal factors. Issues such as a lack of school or separate learning environments, lack of transportation services, traffic hazards, distance between school and home, inappropriate behavior of teachers and classmates in the event of dropout, teacher displacement, change or displacement. School environment, unemployed peers, lack of interest in continuing education, male and sometimes single teachers, distance to school and home, maternal illness, parental oversight, parental illiteracy, death or absence of a parent, lack of male children. In Family, Parental Age, Family Population Frequency of Influential Components in Rural Girls' Education Are. Another result of this study is the category of academic injuries. In fact, this category is the result of the interaction of causal, interventionist, and contextual categories. These interactions have led girls to strategies such as repeated absences, poor schooling, a lack of interest in continuing education, and blaming parents and the school system for inactivity against learning or poor schooling. Therefore, the interaction of the previous passages has led to a strategy for girls to be passively educated.
As a result, the weakness of these factors, which has led to the dropout of girls, suggests the improvement of the inferential factors from the findings of this study, which is presented as a model. Therefore, in order to prevent girls from dropping out of the social capital of society, in addition to providing a model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dropout
  • Rural girls
  • Access to education
  • Educational development
  • Cultural development
Abid, S, Mohd, D., & Afa, M. (2014). A Study of Drop-out rate in Primary Schools of Poonch District of Jammu and Kashmir. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. 1(7): 226-230.
Ada, L. E., & Anyaogu, B. E. (2016). Economic Recession, Hawking and Students Drop out of School in the Five Eastern States of Nigeria. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Research. 2(2): 14-21.
Aghdasi, A., & Zinalfam, A. (2012). Effective Social and Environmental Factors on Student Abandonment (Survivors) in high school students of Miandoab City in the academic year of 90-89. QuarterlyJournal of Instruction and Evaluation. 1 (17): 130-113. [In Persian].
Arefi, M. (2004). Identifying the variables affecting early school leavers' dropout. Journal of Woman in development and politics. 2 (3): 161-147. [In Persian].
Asadzadeh et al. (2017). Investigating the role of employment and education of women on economic growth in Iran.  Women in Development and Politics. 15(3): 359-381. [In Persian].
Aydemirozkeskinb, E., & Aydın, A. (2015). A theoretical framework on open and distance learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 174 (2015) 1750 – 1757.
Azkia, M., Astaneh, A., & Motamedi, F. (2016). Applied research methods. Kayhan Publishing House, Tehran. [In Persian].
Banifatemeh, H., Mohammaditlavar, S., & Nozari, H. (2017). With the semantic reconstruction of the role and position of women in small and medium-sized households (Case Study: Family Economic Firms in Tehran). Journal of Women in Development and Politics. 15(4): 521-499. [In Persian].
Eman, M., & Noushadi, M. (2011). Qualitative Content Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Research. 3 (2): 44-15. [In Persian].
Farokhinejad, P., & Fathi, V. (2018). Study of the reasons for leaving school students in Masumeh's girlfriend's school. Quarterly Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences. 3 (33): 75-69. [In Persian].
Amenaghai, M., & moshtaghyan. (2014). Gender Justice and Sustainable Human Development. Presidential Strategic Review Center. [In Persian].
Farzzizadeh, Z., Taliba, M., & Motavasali, M. (2017). Study of educational obstacles of rural girls (qualitative research). Quarterly Journal of Education. 8 (129): 134-115.
Irna.ir. (2018). 8% of high school students dropped out of Kurdistan. https://www.irna.ir/news/.[In Persian].
Jana, M., Khan, A., Chatterjee, S., Sar, N., & Das, A. (2014). Dropout Rate at Elementary Level in Two Primary Schools of Backward Area, Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal: A Comparative Approach. American Journal of Educational Research2(12), 1288-1297.
Lee, T., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2011). High suspension schools and dropout rates for black and white students. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(2): 167-192.
Mashayekh, F. (2008). Educational Planning Process. UNESCO Advisers Group, Seventh Edition, Tehran: School Publications. [In Persian].
Ministry of Education. (2016). Towards ifelong teaching and learning with quality, equality and inclusiveness for all. UNESCO National Commission, Tehran. [In Persian].
Mehran, G. (2006). Study the causes of girls' dropout in elementary education in the Middle East and North Africa region, especially in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Education. (2) 12: 42-9. [In Persian].
Melissa, A., & Miguel, S. (2015). School Dropout in Central America An Overview of Trends, Causes, Consequences, and Promising Interventions. Policy Research Working Paper, 7561.
Pacravan, B. (2017). What are the opportunities and barriers for women's participation in the development of the country? Tejaret Farda, (239): 15-1. [In Persian].
Qavidl, S., & Darwishi, F. (2013). The Effect of Human Development on Student's Graduation (Inter-provincial Study in Iran). Quarterly Journal of Applied Economic Studies. 1 (8): 178-161. [In Persian].
Gouda, M.., & Sateesh, S. (2014).  Factors Leading to School Dropouts in India: An Analysis of National Family Health Survey-3 Data, IOSR. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 4(6):75-83
Gul, R., & Ali, A. (2013). Causes of Dropout Rate in Government High Schools (Male). Indian Journal of Education and Information Management. 2(1): 566-572.
Joubish, M. F., & Muhammaashraf, K. (2011). Determining the Factors Influencing the Drop out in Government Primary Schools of Karachi. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 7 (3): 417-420.
Rah Dana Network (2016). The dropout statistics are still tremendous and impressive; Is the marriage of the Muslim education system considered an abandoned education? The network of information network is Dana. (http://dana.ir). [In Persian].
Rodriguez-Modroño, P. Galvez-Munoz, L., & Agenjo-Calderón, A. (2016). The Hidden Role of Women in Family Firms. Working Papers in History & Economic Institutions http://www.upo.es/serv/bib/wphaei/haei.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nded. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, U.
Şahin, Ş.,  Zeynep, A., & Abdurrahman, Kılıç. (2016). Causes of Student Absenteeism and School Dropouts. International Journal of Instruction. 9 (1): 195-210.
Sekiya, T., & Ashida, A. (2017). An Analysis of Primary School Dropout Patterns in Honduras. Journal of Latinos and Education, 16(1): 65-73.
Sepidenameh, B., Momeni, H., & Solomonnezhad, M. (2016). Identifying the reasons for leaving school students in the Moussian education district (rural areas). Journal of Community Development (Rural and Urban Communities). 1 (14): 198-167. [In Persian].
Shahidul, S., & Karim, Z. (2015). Factors contributing to school dropout among the girls: A review of literature. European Journal of research and reflection in educational sciences. 3(2): 1-15.
Shirkrami, J., & Bakhtiyrapour, S. (2014). Evaluating Inequalities in Access to Educational Opportunities: A case study of the primary school of Dehloran in 2011-2011 academic year. Quarterly Journal of Education and Research, 7(26): 58-41. [In Persian].
Shirzadi, R., & sozanishirvani, S. (2012). Gender Considerations in Five-Year Development Plans of Iran, Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 8(21: 151-173. [In Persian].
Torani, H., & Arefnejad, S. (2017). Investigating barriers and methods of attracting school dropouts in rural areas and Nomadic. Quarterly Journal of Education. 33(4): 31-48. [In Persian].
UNICEF, (2017). Women's Education and Empowerment. The Situation of Girls and Women in Iran. https://www.unicef.org/iran/fa/education.
UNICEF. (2006). The state of the world's children 2007. women and children: the double dividend of gender equality. 7. Unicef.
Walby, S. (2005). Gender Mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice; Social Politics. 12(3):321-343.
West, A. (2012). Education in schools. In Pete Alak, Margaret M. and Karen Rawlsson, Social Policy Reference (Vol. II). Translation by Ali Akbar Taj Mazinani, Mohsen Ghasemi and Morteza Golich. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University. [In Persian].