اثر ظرفیت‌سازی سازمانی بر یادگیری پایدار با میانجی آموزش چندرسانه‌ای و نوآوری آموزشی در دانشکده‌های تربیت‌بدنی منتخب کشور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد همدان

2 استادیار گروتربیت بدنی، واحد ملایر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ملایر، ایران

3 استادیار گروه تربیت بدنی ، واحدهمدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،، همدان،ایران

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش بررسی اثر ظرفیت‌سازی سازمانی بر یادگیری پایدار با میانجی آموزش چندرسانه‌ای و نوآوری آموزشی در دانشکده‌های تربیت‌بدنی منتخب کشور بود. این تحقیق؛ از نظر نوع توصیفی- همبستگی، از نظر هدف کاربردی، از نظر روش جمع‌آوری داده‌ها میدانی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری را تمامی اساتید، مدرسان و مدیران دانشکده‌های تربیت‌بدنی دانشگاه‌های دولتی کشور تشکیل می‌دادند (حدود 500 نفر). برای نمونه‌گیری همه دانشکده‌ها به مثابه یک سیستم جامع علمی آموزشی تربیت‌بدنی در نظر گرفته شد. نمونه‌ آماری به تعداد قابل کفایت برای آزمون مدل در نرم‌افزار اسمارت پی‌ال‌اس (10 تا 20 برابر سوالات مربوط به متغیر دارای بیشترین تعداد سوال) انتخاب شد (136 نفر). نمونه آماری به روش نمونه‌گیری به صورت تصادفی - خوشه ای از بین دانشکده‌های کشور انجام گردید. ابزار پژوهش، پرسشنامه‌ای (نیمه محقق‌ساخته) شامل 50 سوال (برای 4 متغیر اصلی و 11 بُعد آن‌ها) در مقیاس 5 گزینه لیکرت بود. اعتبارسنجی پژوهش با استفاده از روش روایی محتوایی (10 صاحب‌نظر)، پایایی (آلفای کرونباخ) و روایی سازه (برازش مدل) ارزیابی و تأیید گردید. نتایج مدلسازی نشان داد که هم اثر مستقیم و هم اثر غیر مستقیم (دو میانجی نوآوری آموزشی و آموزش چندرسانه‌ای) متغیر ظرفیت سازمانی بر یادگیری پایدار معنی‌دار بود اما اثر غیرمستقیم آن از اثر مستقیم بیشتر بود. براین اساس می‌توان گفت که متغیرهای ظرفیت سازمانی هر چند اثر قابل توجهی بر یادگیری پایدار دارد اما مداخله در متغیرهای میانجی اثر آن‌ها را در سیستم آموزشی بسیار بیشتر اعمال خواهد کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of organizational capacity building on Sustain learning with mediator role of Multivariate Educational and educational innovation at the Selected Physical education Faculties in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • vahid zakikhani 1
  • Majid Solymani 2
  • Sirus Ahmadi 3
1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan Branch.
2 Professeur assistant de physiothérapie, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
3 Professeur assistant, Département d'éducation physique, Unité, Université islamique Azad, Hamadan, Iran
چکیده [English]

: According to environmental evidence, today in the country, the performance of the university is smoothly criticized and monitored. Expectations from universities go beyond student education and knowledge production and are referred to as leverage in national development. There are differences in these expectations in different disciplines and in proportion to the markets, systems and societies corresponding to these disciplines. In the meantime, more applied and interdisciplinary sciences are in the focus of several dimensions. Whether or not universities use a specialized and appropriate approach in the interdisciplinary sciences has created a challenge for various fields Sports science is one of the dynamic, interdisciplinary and applied fields in higher education. sports Faculties should be able to meet the scientific and educational needs of the sports community to play an important role in the development of sports. Achieving such a thing is no longer possible with the current capacity of these colleges and due to traditional methods of education and research, and there is a need for new and multidimensional methods. In fact, in line with the developments and advances in higher education at the international level, the faculties of sports sciences should provide the necessary ground for more and better participation of students and teachers in the educational process to achieve sustainable learning, and this requires the benefit of innovation. And educational technologies. The aim of this research was the effect of organizational capacity building on Sustain learning with mediator role of Multivariate Educational and educational innovation at the Selected sports sciences Faculties in Iran. Based on the review of the background, the study of these variables in the field of sports science has been very limited and the analysis of the relationships between these variables in all disciplines has been very limited attention of researchers.
Methodology: This research is descriptive-correlative, In terms of practical purpose and in terms of data collection method field. The statistical population consisted of all professors, lecturers and administrators of the sports science's colleges of the state universities (About 500 people). The statistical sample was adequately selected (10 to 20 times as many variable query questions) for testing the model in PLS software (136 persons). All colleges were designated as a comprehensive science education system for sampling. Statistical sampling was done by random-cluster sampling from the faculties of the country. The research tool was a questionnaire (Semi-standard) containing 50 questions (for 4 main variables and 11 dimensions) on a 5-point Likert scale. Content validity (10 experts), reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and construct validity (model fitting) were evaluated and validated.
Results: Modeling results showed that Dimensions of managerial capacity (0.84), cultural capacity (0.83), entrepreneurial capacity (0.83), resource capacity (0.70) and scientific capacity (0.67) have a significant role in explaining capacity building, respectively. They were organizational. In the multimedia education variable, the dimensions of multimedia technology (0.94) and multimedia culture (0.89) had a significant role in explaining the effect, respectively. Methodological (0.94) and content (0.93) dimensions also had a significant role in explaining educational innovation, respectively. The dimensions of learning continuity (0.89), learning significance (0.87) and professional learning community (0.87) had a more significant role in explaining sustainable learning, respectively. The test of direct relationships between variables in the model showed that organizational capacity building with coefficients of 0.72, 0.25 and 0.28, respectively, has a direct and significant effect on multimedia education, educational innovation and sustainable learning. Multimedia education with a coefficient of 0.60 and 0.32 has a direct and significant effect on educational innovation and sustainable learning. Finally, the variable of educational innovation with a coefficient of 0.37 has a direct and significant effect on sustainable learning. The test of indirect relationships between variables in the model showed that the indirect effect of organizational capacity on sustainable learning through educational innovation and multimedia training was significant with coefficients of 0.35 and 0.45, respectively. results showed that both direct and indirect effects (two mediators of educational innovation and multimedia educational) of organizational capacity variable on sustainable learning were significant but its indirect effect was more than direct effect. Based on this, it can be said that although organizational capacity variables have a significant effect on sustainable learning, intervention in mediating variables will have much more effect on the educational system.
Conclusion: Physical education schools, like other organizations, are made up of different components and different relationships between them that are interacting with each other. Hence, management in such a system would be very complex and incomprehensible. Models help managers to better understand the integrity of the system by simplifying the whole system, to better categorize problems, and to have a better chance of finding the right answers. in general, in explaining the convergence between the analyzed variables, it can be said that based on the research findings, it can be said that organizational capacity building can increase the educational system (innovation, multimedia and learning) in the organization. But much of its ultimate effectiveness depends on the dimensions of the education system (innovation and multimedia). Therefore, it is necessary for the management of the country's sports sciences faculties to know the mentioned variables and the relations between them in order to improve their educational system, and to consider their integrated performance mechanisms in the implementation of programs and actions. The research model can be studied and interpreted in a multilevel and systematic way. Based on this, it can be said that the mentioned variables flow from the structural level to the functional level of the faculties (capacity building, innovation, multimedia, stabilization). Therefore, in order to achieve proper educational performance, it is necessary to manage these colleges while improving the level, scope and intensity of the effect of these variables as much as possible. Explaining the application of research results, it can be said that the educational management of sports schools does not have sufficient quantitative and qualitative models to measure and requires an acceptable method to identify the risks that the weaknesses of the educational system impose on learning. Models such as the results of this study can better determine the degree of adaptation between how new educational approaches.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Educational Management
  • Educational Technology
  • Innovation Management
  • Educational Media
  • physical Education
Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M. D., Infante-Moro, J. C., & Ruipérez García, G. (2020). Sustainable Management of Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Global Research Trends. Sustainability, 12(5), 2107.
Akbari asl hasoni, K. kashef, M., & hoseini, F. (2013). The Effective Factors of Iran Sport Management Masters' Enjoyment of Technology and Comparison with Turkey Universities. Journal of Sport Management. 5(16): 171-191. [In Persian].
Akhondi, A. (2011). The effective multimedia instruction in remedy spelling disability education needs. Journal of Social and behavioral sciences. 2(2): 4341-4345.
Andesh, M., grandson I.A., Arasteh, H., & Zeinabadi, H. R. (2018). Identifying and validating the indicators of educational development of public universities. Research in Teaching, 6 (3), 147-174. [In Persian].
Asgari, M. (2014). Investigating the Challenges of Change in Physical Education Faculties. M.Sc, Shahroud University. [In Persian].
Babadi Akasheh, Z., Nasr, A.R., Nili, M.R., Tabatabai, S.M.S. (2019). Explain the goals and activities of teaching and learning in the law internship curriculum. Research in Teaching, 7 (1), 189-210. [In Persian].
Bani Asadi, E. (2016). Evaluation of Entrepreneurship Indicators in Physical Education Faculties of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. [In Persian].
Bień, W., & Čillík, I. (2019). Multimedia Education in Motor Learning and Teaching: The Development of Skiing Technique. Studia Periegetica, Social and Economic Aspects of Tourism and Recreation, 145-157.
Blok, R., Oostam, M. E. Otter, M., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer Assisted Instruction in support of Beginnig Reading Instruction, A Review of education research. 72(1): 101-130.
Castañeda, M. P. Villaseñor, E. B., & Parodi, J. R. C. (2018). Método de innovación educativa para promover desarrollo de invenciones en instituciones de educación superior Method of educational innovation to promote the development of inventions, higher education institutions.
Cetinkaya, T., Kirtepe, A., & Ugurlu, F. M. (2018). Examination of the Attitudes of School of Physical Education and Sports Students towards Teaching Profession in Terms of Various Variables. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(2): 80-84.
Çınar, F., & Eren, E. (2015). Organizational learning capacity impact on sustainable innovation: The case of public hospitals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. (181): 251-260.
Darabi, H. (2013). Factors Influencing Knowledge Management Implementation in Physical Education Faculties of Iran. New Approaches to Sport Management. 1(2): 53- 67. [In Persian].
Datta, S., Saad, M., & Sarpong, D. (2019). National systems of innovation, innovation niches, and diversity in university systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143(C), 27-36.
Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with PLS Software. Academic Jihad. First Edition. Tehran. [In Persian]
Deal, S. B. Stefanidis, D. Brunt, L. M., & Alseidi, A. (2017). Development of a multimedia tutorial to educate how to assess the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using expert review and crowd-sourcing. The American Journal of Surgery. 213(5): 988-990.
Diani, A. (2015). Presenting Strategic Thinking Competitive Advantage Model in Selected State Public Schools, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [In Persian].
Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2018). Policy learning and organizational capacity. In the Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. London. 6(3): 595-620.
Farajollahi, P. (2017). Designing a Capacity Development Process Pattern in Iranian Public Universities. PhD Thesis. Allameh Tabataba'i University. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. [In Persian].
Fazel Bakhsheshi, M. Aghaei, N., & Akbari Yazdi, H. (2017). Analyzing the Quality Function Deployment in Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science of Kharazmi University Based on SERVQUAL model. Sport Management and Development. 6(2): 47-69. [In Persian].
Forouzandeh, L., Danaei Fard, H., Rahnavard Ahan, F., & Mohammadi Fateh, A. (2014). Investigating the Organizational Capacity of Imam Ali Officers University Based on McKinsey's Model, Military Management Quarterly. 1 (1): 2-1. [In Persian].
Freilich, R., & Shechtman, Z. (2010). The contribution of art therapy to the social, emotional, and academic adjustment of children with learning disabilities. The Arts in psychotherapy. (37): 97-105.
Hematinezahd, M., Shabani, S., & Faraji, R. (2019). Investigating Educational Services Quality in Faculties of Sport Sciences via Quality Function Deployment (QFD) (Case Study of Faculty of Sport Sciences at University of Guilan). Research onٍ Educational Sport, 7(16), 257-284.
Hoa, T. T. (2019). Actual Situation for Capacity of Vocational Consultancy of Students in University of Education. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(6), 418-427.
Hosseini, L. (2015). Presenting the Knowledge Management-Based Competitive Advantage Model by Mediating Organizational Innovation in Selected Physical Education Public Schools of Iran. M.Sc in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [In Persian].
Khan, T. M. (2010). The effects of multimedia learning on children with different special students specific learning in Iran at year 2009. Journal of Social and behavioral sciences. 2(2): 4341–4345.
Khosravizadeh, E., haghdadi, A., & kamankesh, A. (2015). Barriers and strategies for relationship between sport industry and higher education institutions in Markazi Province. Research on Educational Sport. 3(8): 15-36 [In Persian].
Mandalizadeh, Z., & Honari, H. (2011). Investigating Entrepreneurship Challenges in Physical Education Faculties from the Experts' Point of View and Presenting Corrective Solutions. First International Conference on Management, Futures, Entrepreneurship and Industry in Higher Education, Sanandaj, Kurdistan University. [In Persian].
Mashiyane, D. M., Bangani, S., & Van Deventer, K. (2020). The awareness and application of multimedia tools for information literacy instruction at an African university. The Electronic Library.
Mizani, M. khabiri, M. honari, H., & sajjadi, N. (2013). The Problems of Writing Physical Education Theses for Master Graduate Students of Selected Universities. Journal of Sport Management. 5(16): 149-169. [In Persian].
Moore, M., & Clavert, S. (2000). Brief report: vocabulary acquisition for children with autism: Teacher or computer instruction. Journal of autism & developmental disorders. 30(4): 359-363.
Naghavi, M. Honari, H., & kargar, GH. (2013). Barriers to the Application of Information Technology in the Process of Teaching and Researching Physical Education and Sport Sciences from the Viewpoints of Faculty Members Based on the Cutter Process Model. Journal of Sport Management and Motor Behavior. 9 (18): 97-112. [In Persian].
Nicholls, A. (2018). Managing educational innovations. Routledge. Pan, G., & Tan, G. H. (2018). Case study'SMU-X': Creating an educational innovation for a higher education campus. ink.library.smu.edu.
Piri, M., & Shahi, R. (2016). Effects of multi-media teaching on academic engagement of sixth grade learners of nomadic multi-grade classes in science course. Technology of Education. 11(1): 11-19. [In Persian].
Pornaderi, P. Nasr, A. Nili, M., & Bagheri, Z. (2014). Evaluation of the Implementing Different Methods of Measurement and Sustainable Learning Based Measurements. Technology of Education. 8(2): 124-115. [In Persian].
Rahimnajafzadeh, M. Kheybare, M., & Mozafre, S. (2008). Assessing the Status of P.E. Departments in the Islamic Azad University Branches from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members and Department Heads. 2 (5): 127-149. [In Persian].
Reid, J. R., & Baker, R. S. (2018). Designing and testing an educational innovation. Pediatric radiology. 48(10): 1406-1409.
Ryymin, E., Corado, C., Friman, M., Medrano, M. M., & Viskari, M. (2018). Leading research and development for educational innovations. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação. 13(1): 324-336.
Şahin, E., Çekin, R., & Yazıcılar Özçelik, İ. (2018). Predictors of academic achievement among physical education and sports undergraduate students. Sports, 6(1): 8-18.
Sriadhi, S. Gultom, S. Restu, R., & Simarmata, J. (2018). The Effect of Tutorial Multimedia on the Transformator Learning Outcomes Based on the Students’ Visual Ability. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 384(1): 012059.
Swierzy, P. Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2018). The impact of organizational capacity on voluntary engagement in sports clubs: A multi-level analysis. Sport Management Review. 21(3): 307-320.
Vakaliuk, T., Antoniuk, D., Morozov, A., Medvedieva, M., & Medvediev, M. (2020). Green IT as a tool for design cloud-oriented sustainable learning environment of a higher education institution. In E3S Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 166: p. 10013.
Waller, R. E., Lemoine, P. A., Mense, E. G., & Richardson, M. D. (2020). Building Capacity for Quality Assurance in Global Higher Education. Journal of Education and Development, 4(1), 37.
Wang, Q. (2020, March). The Strategy of Cultivating Graduate Students’ Innovation in Interdisciplinary Perspective. In 4th International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society Atlantis Press: 1218-1221.