• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Research in Teaching

  1. Home
  2. Comparison of the effectiveness of Montessori method and Fernald's multi-sensory method on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in disorder Dysgraphia

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Comparison of the effectiveness of Montessori method and Fernald's multi-sensory method on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in disorder Dysgraphia

    Authors

    • Mehdi Salehi 1
    • Asghar Fouladi 2
    • Masoud Fazlalipour Miyandoab 3

    1 Assistant Professor of Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

    2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

    3 Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.22034/trj.2025.142430.2091
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Learning disabilities are diagnosed when an individual has specific deficiencies in the ability to understand or process information appropriately and correctly. One of the learning disabilities is writing disorder. The ability to correctly write sequences of letters, or in other words, the correct spelling of words in a language, is one of the important aspects of written language, particularly significant in the early stages of learning the writing system of a language (Vary & Modul, 1995).
The causes of learning disabilities include biological disorders, perceptual-motor disorders, visual and auditory processing disorders, and memory and attention disorders, which primarily occur during the preschool period (Feola, Marino, Masulo Trabocco & Marcella, 2015). Developmental disabilities are precursors to future academic learning disabilities. Preschool children who are developmentally normal easily acquire pre-academic skills before they officially enter school, but any developmental deviation may be a precursor to learning disabilities. Children with learning disabilities are disorganized in their movements and have difficulties with fine motor skills and motor control (Giri, 2010). Researchers indicate that there is a positive correlation between perceptual-motor development and academic performance in children, and students who perform better in perceptual-motor and cognitive development show better academic progress (Norbash, 2006).
The main objectives in writing skills focus on the ability to write the letters of the alphabet, correctly combine letters, form words, and construct sentences. For spelling, the student must have the ability to remember the shapes of the learned letters and write them together, first forming words and then sentences. Therefore, we try to perform subtle movements with the fingers during the teaching of each lesson (Dardashti, 2017). Essentially, writing is a complex mental activity that is far more advanced than reading. The language skill of "spelling" refers to the accurate transfer of phonetic symbols to written letters. Due to incomplete writing and incorrect spelling, it is not possible to convey complete and precise meaning to the reader. It seems that if this error did not exist.
The main objectives in writing skills focus on the ability to write the alphabet, correctly combine letters, form words, and construct sentences. For spelling, students must have the ability to remember the shapes of the learned letters and write them together, first writing words and then sentences.The different sensory perceptions of individuals with specific learning disabilities lead to a decrease in attention when faced with stimuli such as letters. The logical conclusion is that these individuals need assistance in three areas: improving sensory perceptions, increasing attention during the interval between reading and spelling, and finally practicing reading and spelling.
Various therapeutic methods, including the Montessori method and the Fernald multisensory approach, are used to improve visual memory and auditory sensitivity. The Fernald method is based on the Gestalt psychology principle that the whole is different from the sum of its parts, and the visual area of the brain does not respond to discrete visual input elements (Schultz & Schultz, 2011). Words are represented in the brain as a unified whole rather than as discrete components. The Montessori method is an educational approach that provides opportunities for self-directed learning, individual study freedom, cognitive development, and adaptation to the social environment's needs for children, utilizing educational tools to develop their self-sufficiency skills (Darleiman et al., 2019).
The sensory integration therapeutic model engages the child's senses through playful tasks, creating a practice-like aspect in sensory coordination, ultimately leading to improved coordination and accuracy of sensory performance. Since focused attention plays a crucial role in maintaining integrity and enhancing performance in learning, it seems that it could be effective in writing disorders. Given the aforementioned points, the present research aims to answer the question of whether the Montessori method and the Fernald multisensory approach have an impact on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in specific learning disabilities (writing).

This study was conducted in a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test and post-test format, involving two experimental groups and one control group among 60 first-grade students in Tabriz with specific learning disabilities, specifically dysgraphia, who were selected through convenience sampling. The selected students had normal intelligence and healthy vision and hearing based on standardized assessments, and they were only two standard deviations below the class average in spelling scores. The tests used in this research included the following.
1- Weschler Memory Test: The Weschler Clinical Memory Test was used to measure memory. This test was employed to assess the auditory and visual sensitivity of children in their ability to store and recall previously heard and seen words or objects, as well as short-term memory.
2- Montessori Method: During 10 sessions, various exercises were provided to the participants to enhance different senses and perceptions, such as sorting pictures to strengthen visual memory and working with nuts and bolts using a wrench to enhance tactile memory. Ultimately, feedback was gathered from the children to summarize the educational content.
3- Fernald Method: In the first session, the multi-sensory Fernald method for learning spelling was explained, and words were written in a raised format on educational cards so that the shape of the word could be felt. In the following 7 sessions, the children's senses were utilized to recall the correct spelling of words, including visual, tactile, and auditory senses.
The results of the above study indicate that visual memory and auditory sensitivity increased more significantly in the Montessori and Fernald methods compared to the control group, and this difference is statistically significant (p < 0.01). It can be said that the Montessori method has an impact on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in first-grade students with dysgraphia in Tabriz. In explaining the relevant findings, it can be noted that in the Montessori method, the teacher works individually with the children. Individualized educational programs have a positive effect on children's cognitive development (Kaili, 2018).
The multi-sensory Fernald method also affects visual memory and auditory sensitivity in first-grade students with dysgraphia in Tabriz. The most important technique in this method is the tracing approach, where during the educational program, students learn the entire word as a simple unit and strengthen their memory by tracing it. Therefore, it can be said that the multi-sensory Fernald method is effective in characteristics such as reading errors due to omission, addition, and correction of words, difficulty in recognizing the shape and size of letters, poor spelling, and inability to remember names.

Keywords

  • Montessori method
  • Fernald'
  • s multi-sensory method
  • visual memory
  • auditory sensitivity
  • disorder Dysgraphia

Main Subjects

  • Education and teaching
  • XML
  • PDF 1.21 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Armon, S., Ghara Daghi, A., & Vahedi, S. (2021). The effectiveness of Montessori method training on visual-motor abilities of students with nonverbal learning disabilities. Ravanshenasi-i Ruyesh Journal,  10(10), 133-144 [in Persian].
Armon, S., Ghareh Daghi, A., & Vahedi, S. (2021). The effectiveness of Montessori education on the neuropsychological functioning of students with nonverbal learning disorders. Quarterly Journal of New Educational Thoughts, 17(4), 33-7[Persian].
Baezzat, F. (2010). The role of word processor with self-questioning strategies in improving spelling difficulties of third-grade elementary students with dysgraphia. Journal of Applied Psychology,  4(3) [in Persian].
Benisi, V.,  &Gholami, A. (2022). Suggested solutions for improving dysgraphia disorder. Journal of a New Approach in Educational Sciences, 4)2(, 33-27[Persian].
Hagh Talab, T., Yazdani, F., & Aghaei, A. (2015). Comparing the effectiveness of Orton-Gillingham and Fernald multisensory instructional methods on improving dysgraphia in students with writing disorders in Malayer. Cognitive Strategies in Learning,  3(4), 71-85 [in Persian].
Dardashti, N. (1999). Educational strategies in learning disabilities. Isfahan: Razavi Publications [in Persian].
Dibazar, M., & Panah Ali, A. (2020). Comparing the effectiveness of Fernald multisensory method and Orton method on improving dyslexia in female elementary students with dyslexia. *Ravanshenasi-i Ruyesh Journal,  9(8), 101-110 [in Persian].
Dini, M., Aghdasi, A. N., & Golmohammadnejad Bahrami, G. (2015). The effect of sensory integration exercises on the sensory profile of elementary school students with dyslexia and dysgraphia. Education and Evaluation (Educational Sciences),  7(28), 9-20 [in Persian].
Dereli İman, E., Danişman, Ş., Akin Demircan, Z., & Yaya, D. (2019). The effect of the montessori education method on pre - school children’s social competence –behaviour and emotion regulation skills. Early Child Development and Care. 189(9), 1494 -1508.
Feola, A., Marino, V., Masullo, A., Trabucco, A. M., & Marsella, L. T. (2015). The protection of individuals affected with Specific Learning Disorders in the Italian Legislation. La Clinica Terapeutica, 166(3), e177-81.
Fraga González, G., Žarić, G., Tijms, J., Bonte, M., Blomert, L., & van der Molen, M. W. (2015). A randomized controlled trial on the beneficial effects of training letter-speech sound integration on reading fluency in children with dyslexia. PloS one, 10(12), e0143914.
Fernald, G. (1988). Remedial techniques in basic schoolsubjects. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
 
Geary, D. C. (2010). Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and individual differences, 20(2), 130-133.
George, P. P. (1978). Wechsler memory scale: A selective review of literature, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34(4). 81-97.
Ghasemian Moghadam, Hanieh; and Mohammadzadeh, Hassan (2024). The effect of goal-oriented physical training on cognitive functions of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Sport Motor Development and Learning, (3)16, 5-21.
Gustafson, L. (2018). Multi -sensory approach impact on learning sight words and engagement in a positive learning environment. [Thesis for Master of Special Education]. [Illinois, US]: Western Illinois University; pp: 43 –62.
Hairston, W. D., Burdette, J. H., Flowers, D. L., Wood, F. B., & Wallace, M. T. (2005). Altered temporal profile of visual–auditory multisensory interactions in dyslexia. Experimental Brain Research, 166(3), 474-480.
Jeyasekaran, J. M. (2015). Effectiveness of visual auditory kinesthetic tactile technique on reading level among dyslexic children at Helikx Open School and Learning Centre, Salem. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 4(3), 315-319.
Johnson, K., & Bast (2010). Precision Teaching. In N. Salkind (Ed), Encyclopedia of educational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 809-813). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Johnson, K., & Bast (2010). Response to intervention and precision teaching: Creating synergy in the classroom. Guilford Press.
Kast, M., Baschera, G. M., Gross, M., Jäncke, L., & Meyer, M. (2011). Computer-based learning of spelling skills in children with and without dyslexia. Annals of dyslexia, 61(2), 177-200.
Kayılı, G. (2018). The effect of montessori method on cognitive tempo of kindergarten children. Early Child Development and Care. 188(3), 327 -335.
Kakavand, A., Damercheli, N., & Shirmohammadi, F. (2017). Comparing the effectiveness of Fernald and Orton-Gillingham multisensory methods in improving reading skills of students with dyslexia. Learning Disabilities,  7(1), 100-118 [in Persian].
Lerner, J. W. (1993). Reading and learning disabilities. Elementary English, 50(2), 69.
Moll, K., Göbel, S. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2015). Basic number processing in children with specific learning disorders: comorbidity of reading and mathematics disorders. Child Neuropsychology, 21(3), 399-417.
Pourkamali, A., Mohammadi, A., & Haghighat, S. (2022). The effectiveness of Fernald's multisensory approach on improving dictation disorder and reading problems of students. Journal of Disability Studies, 12(52), 7-1[Persian].
Pakofte, N., Karimi P., & Faramarzi, F. (2018). Asarbakhshi amoozesh ravesh chand hessi Fernald bar behboud Natavan yadgiri emla [The effectiveness of teaching fernald multi -sensory method on improving spelling learning disability]. In: 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Cultural Studies. Tehran, Iran: Center for Empowerment of Cultural and Social Skills of the Community [Persian].
Plesma, H. L. (2006).Wechslermemory scale performance in geropsychiatric patients,  Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42 (2), 323-327.
Reid. D. B. & Kelly. M. P, (2006).Wechsler memory scale-revised in closed injury, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(2), 245-254.
Ryan, J. Morris. J. Yaffa. S. Peterson. L, (2004), Psychodiagnostic processes: Objective test of ability test-retest reliability of Wechsler memory scale. Form I,  Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(4), 847-848.
Sale, A., Berardi, N., & Maffei, L. (2009). Enrich the environment to empower the brain. Trends in neurosciences. 32(4), 233 - 239.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (1996). A history of modern psychology (A. A. Seif, H. Pasha Sharifi, Kh. Aliabadi, & J. Najafizand, Trans.). Tehran: Doran. (Original work published 1996)
Shahbazi, S., Rahmani, M., & Heirani, A. (2015). The effectiveness of sensorimotor integration activities on balance and reaction time in children with developmental coordination disorder. Modern Rehabilitation Journal,  9(7), 1-9 [in Persian].
Saberi, R. (2024). Investigating the effect of two linear and nonlinear curricula on interpersonal skills: A study of the teaching methods of two educational centers: Reggio Emilia and Montessori. Quarterly Journal of Teaching Research, 12(3), 62-39[Persian].
Tabatabaei, M., Salimi, M., & Nadi, S. (2014). Comparison of Short Term (Visual, Audio, Associative Learning) Active and Long Term Memory between Strong and Weak Students in Persian Language dictation. New Educational Approaches, 9(2), 103-120 [in Persian].
Varnosfaderani, M., Parhoon, K., & Pushneh, K. (2016). The effectiveness of sensorimotor integration on balance performance and reading skills in children with dyslexia. Journal of Behavioral Sciences Research,  14(2), 257-263 [in Persian]. 
Vaz, N.(2013). Montessori Special Education and Nature’s Playground. The NAMTA Journal. 38(1), 71-79.
Wray. D; Medwell. J, (1995). Teaching primary english. London, Routledge.
Yaghoubi, A.., Fanae Nematsara, Z., Zoghi Paydar, M., & Afzali, A. (2023). Investigating the effect of educational intervention based on water games on the writing performance of students with poor writing skills in the first grade of elementary school. Quarterly Journal of Teaching Research, 11(4), 118-141[Persian].
Zhang, X., Fu,  W ., Xue, L. (2019). Children With mathematical learning difficulties are sluggish in disengaging attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 932.
    • Article View: 383
    • PDF Download: 263
Research in Teaching
Volume 12, Issue 4 - Serial Number 40
February 2025
Pages 162-180
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.21 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 383
  • PDF Download: 263

APA

Salehi, M. , Fouladi, A. and Fazlalipour Miyandoab, M. (2025). Comparison of the effectiveness of Montessori method and Fernald's multi-sensory method on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in disorder Dysgraphia. Research in Teaching, 12(4), 162-180. doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.142430.2091

MLA

Salehi, M. , , Fouladi, A. , and Fazlalipour Miyandoab, M. . "Comparison of the effectiveness of Montessori method and Fernald's multi-sensory method on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in disorder Dysgraphia", Research in Teaching, 12, 4, 2025, 162-180. doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.142430.2091

HARVARD

Salehi, M., Fouladi, A., Fazlalipour Miyandoab, M. (2025). 'Comparison of the effectiveness of Montessori method and Fernald's multi-sensory method on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in disorder Dysgraphia', Research in Teaching, 12(4), pp. 162-180. doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.142430.2091

CHICAGO

M. Salehi , A. Fouladi and M. Fazlalipour Miyandoab, "Comparison of the effectiveness of Montessori method and Fernald's multi-sensory method on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in disorder Dysgraphia," Research in Teaching, 12 4 (2025): 162-180, doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.142430.2091

VANCOUVER

Salehi, M., Fouladi, A., Fazlalipour Miyandoab, M. Comparison of the effectiveness of Montessori method and Fernald's multi-sensory method on visual memory and auditory sensitivity in disorder Dysgraphia. Research in Teaching, 2025; 12(4): 162-180. doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.142430.2091

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb