• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Research in Teaching

  1. Home
  2. Teachers’ Understanding and Use Of Authentic Assessment In the Teaching-Learning Process

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Publication Ethics

Article Processing Fees

Copyright and Open Access Policy

Open access and Copyright Policy

Plagiarism Approach

Finding Similarity

Archiving Policy

Conflict of Interest

Article Evaluation

Extended Abstract

Conflict of Interest Sheet and Ethical Commitment

Authors Guide APA citation method

Guide for Authors

Teachers’ Understanding and Use Of Authentic Assessment In the Teaching-Learning Process

    Authors

    • Hana Ahamdi 1
    • Naser Shirbagi 2
    • Sanam Shirbagi 3

    1 Department of Education Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Kurdistan , Sanandaj, Iran

    2 Professor of Educatioanal Administration, Department of Education, University of Kurdistan. Sanandaj. Iran

    3 MA, Faculty of Psycology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Behashti University, Tehran, Iran.

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.22034/trj.2024.139417.1827
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Objectives and questions: In recent years, interest and support for a type of measurement that is less common has been aroused, and that is original measurement. The original measurement is different in its form and implementation, but it is not different from the common forms of measurement, density and formation measurement that are used today. Authentic assessment focuses and relies on the existence of connections between the real world outside the school and the school environment itself. Authentic assessment is an assessment task that has value and meaning for the student beyond the grade obtained. Authentic assessment is a concept popularized by among others that students engage in the use and application of skills and knowledge to address real-world problems or potential situations and give the assignment a sense of authenticity. With the concept of authentic measurement, its tools and types, there is a need to conduct research in this regard, considering the novelty of its concepts. The purpose of the current research is to develop and validate two questionnaires on the extent of teachers' use of authentic assessment and teachers' perception of authentic assessment. Therefore, the following research questions have been raised: 1) what is the level of perception of high school teachers about the concept of authentic assessment? 2) What is the rate of use of the principles of authentic assessment by high school teachers? 3) What difference do demographic variables such as gender, teaching experience, level of education, service area, and type of employment make in teachers' perception or use of the concept and principles of authentic assessment?
Research method: In this research, a quantitative research approach with a survey strategy was used. The statistical population consists of all teachers of the theoretical second secondary level (certain formal, formal experimental, contract and teaching rights) working in the dual education and training areas of Sanandaj city in the academic year 1401-1400. The sample people in this research were selected by two-stage cluster sampling method, so that in the first stage, 20 schools were randomly selected as a cluster out of 83 secondary schools, and then they were randomly selected from this school according to the number of their teachers, in order to estimate the sample size of Cochran's formula was used, and the number of 200 subjects was determined. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics methods were used to analyze the quantitative data collected by questionnaire. In the descriptive statistics section, the frequency and percentage as well as statistical indicators such as mean, standard deviation, minimum, median, maximum and skewness coefficient have been used, and in the inferential statistics section, the one-sample mean test using Student's t-distribution, comparison test The average of two independent groups was used using Student's t distribution and the comparison test of the average of several independent groups was used using one-way analysis of variance and Pearson's correlation coefficient test.
Data collection tools: To collect data from two questionnaires created by the researcher under the headings A- Questionnaire on the extent of teachers' use of authentic assessment and exploratory factor analysis using principal component analysis method with Varimax rotation, and the results of the above table show that 8 factors have special value There are more than one, the highest eigenvalue is equal to 14.62 and the lowest eigenvalue is 1.08. The first factor accounts for 28.66% of the variance and the eighth factor accounts for 2.12% of the variance, and eight factors together account for 68.56% of the variance of the questionnaire. B- The teachers' perception questionnaire was used in the classroom. Two methods of test-retest and Cronbach's alpha have been used for reliability. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using principal component analysis with varimax rotation. The results show that 7 factors have an eigenvalue greater than one, the highest eigenvalue is 11.22 and the lowest eigenvalue is 1.09. The first factor accounts for 28.78% of the variance and the seventh factor accounts for 1.092% of the variance, and eight factors together account for 70.75% of the variance of the questionnaire.
Findings: The level of perception of high school teachers about the concept of authentic assessment was more than average and with the findings of the researches that expressed the attitude and understanding of teachers about authentic assessment, it is significant. The amount of use of the selected sample teachers of authentic assessment principles was also more than average and it was in line with the findings of previous researches, he reached the conclusion in his study in Indonesia that the use of authentic assessment among teachers is more than average.
Discussion and conclusion: The obtained results indicated that the level of perception and use of authentic assessment of male and female teachers was equal, that is, gender had no effect on it. The results of this finding are also in line with the results of previous findings which showed that gender has no effect on teachers' perception and use of authentic assessment. The level of perception and the amount of use of authentic assessment was also the same in the teachers of district one and two of Sanandaj city, which indicates that the district did not affect the level of perception and the amount of use of authentic assessment. The level of teachers' perception and use of authentic assessment was equal in teachers with associate, bachelor, master and doctorate degrees and teachers with different employment methods. That is, the educational qualification and type of employment of teachers did not affect the level of perception and the amount of use of authentic assessment. In the examination of the work experience of the teachers, the result is that there is no significant linear relationship between the work experience of the teachers and the level of perception and the amount of use of authentic assessment, that is, the amount of work experience of the teachers did not affect the level of perception and the amount of use of authentic assessment. The results of this finding are also in line with previous researches that stated that work history and experience have no effect on professors' attitude and use of authentic assessment.

Keywords

  • : authentic assessment
  • survey method
  • Utilization
  • teachers'
  • perception
  • students

Main Subjects

  • Education and teaching
  • XML
  • PDF 1.27 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Hoy, A, W., & Hoy, K. W. (2013). Instructional Leadership: AResearch_Based Guide to Learning in Schools. Translated by: Nader Soleimami, Mahmmoud Safari, Morteza Nazari (2017). Tehran: Arasbaran. [In Persian]
Allen, J. P., Frey, B. B., & Schmitt, V. L. (2012). Defining Authentic Classroom Assessment. Practical Assessment, research & Evaluation, 17(2), 18.
Arnold, L. (2019). Advancing Authentic Assessment Practice. Arise lecture, 27/11/2019, Edinburgh Napier University https://staff.napier.ac.uk/services/dlte/Pages/DLTE-Past-Events-201920.aspx.
Ashford_ Rowe, k., Herrington, J., & Brown, c. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205-222.
Ashwin, P. (2020). Transforming university education: a manifesto. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C.S. (2007). In: Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Students Does, third ed. McGraw-Hill/Society for Research in to Higher Education & Open University Press, Maidenhead.
Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education 15(1), 101_111
Boud, D., 1995. Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? In: knight, P. (Ed.), Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Kogan Page, London, p.189.
Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for the assessment reform in higher education.
Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London, New York: Routledge.
Brown, S. (2019). Using assessment and feedback to empower students and enhance their learning, in Bryan, C. and Clegg, K. (eds), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. 2nd edn. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 50–63.
Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2021). Authentic assessment. Available online. Indian University Bloomington http://citl.indiana.edu/
Davison, G. (2011) Investigating the relationships between authentic assessment and the development of learner autonomy. University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom).
Gulikers, J.T.M., Bastiaens, T.J., & Kirschner, P.A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Developmant,52(3).67_86.
Gulikers, J. T. M. (2006). Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: Beliefs and perceptions of authentic assessment and the impact on student learning. Interuniversity Centre for Educational Research, pp. 1-160.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, Th. J., & Kirschner, P.A. (2006). Authentic assessment, student and teacher perception: the practical value of the five-dimensional framework. Journal of vocational Education and Training, 58, 337_357
Kamens, D., & Benavot, A. (2011). National, reginal and international learning assessment: Trends among developing countries, 1960_2009. Globalization, societies and Education, 9(2), 285_300
Kinash, S., Mc Gillivrary, L., & Crane, L. (2018). Do university students, alumni, educators and employers link assessment and graduate employability? Higher Education Research & Development,37(2),301_315
Looney, A., Cumming, J., Van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualizing the role of teachers as assessors: teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5),442_467
Lund, J. (1997). Authentic assessment: Its development & applications. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 68(7), pp.25-28.
Lundahl, B. (2009). Engelsk språkdidaktik – Texter, kommunikation, språkutveckling. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Mac Tighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (2021). Assessing student learning by design:  principles and practices for teachers and school leaders. New York:  Teachers College Press
McArthur, J. (2021). For assessment to count as authentic it must mean something to students WONKHEhttps://wonkhe.com/blogs/forassessment-to-count-as-authentic-it-must-mean-something-to-students/
Mueller, J., (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox: enhancing student learning through online faculty development, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 1(1),1_7
Naser, I.A.S., Arman, I.M.A, & Nafi, J.S.I, (2017).The Degree Of Faculty’s Use Of Authentic Assessment Tools At AL_Quds Towards Them, International Journal Of Education, Learning and Development. Vol.5. No.7, PP.44_63.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education, 2nd edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sambell, K., McDowell, L. and Brown, S. (1997) “But is it fair?”: an exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in educational evaluation, 23(4), pp.349-371.
Sambell, K., McDowell, L. & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.
Segers, M., Dochy, F.& Cascallar, E. (2003). The era of assessment engineering: changing perspectives on teaching and learning and the role of new model of assessment, in: M. Sergers, F. Dochy & Cascallar E. (Eds.) Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards
Shinn, C. (2012). Teacher education reform in Palestine: policy challenges amid donor expectations.  Comparative Education Review, 56(4),608_633
The assessment National Team. (2004). The strategies of Evaluation and tools, Administration Exams and tests, Jordan, The Ministry of Education.
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C. & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), pp.840-854
Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,70,703_713
Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessing student performance. San Francisco; Jessey _ Bass, pp.47_67
 
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessment to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
Zubi, A. A. (2013). Knowledge and Utilization Degree of Authentic Assessment Strategies and Tools by Mathematical Teachers. Journal of the Islamic University for Education and Psychology, 12(3): 165-197. Retrieved from http://www.iugaza.edu.ps/ar/perio
    • Article View: 777
    • PDF Download: 645
Research in Teaching
Volume 11, Issue 4 - Serial Number 33
January 2024
Pages 197-170
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.27 M
History
  • Receive Date: 16 July 2023
  • Revise Date: 25 February 2024
  • Accept Date: 07 March 2024
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 777
  • PDF Download: 645

APA

Ahamdi, H. , Shirbagi, N. and Shirbagi, S. (2023). Teachers’ Understanding and Use Of Authentic Assessment In the Teaching-Learning Process. Research in Teaching, 11(4), 197-170. doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.139417.1827

MLA

Ahamdi, H. , , Shirbagi, N. , and Shirbagi, S. . "Teachers’ Understanding and Use Of Authentic Assessment In the Teaching-Learning Process", Research in Teaching, 11, 4, 2023, 197-170. doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.139417.1827

HARVARD

Ahamdi, H., Shirbagi, N., Shirbagi, S. (2023). 'Teachers’ Understanding and Use Of Authentic Assessment In the Teaching-Learning Process', Research in Teaching, 11(4), pp. 197-170. doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.139417.1827

CHICAGO

H. Ahamdi , N. Shirbagi and S. Shirbagi, "Teachers’ Understanding and Use Of Authentic Assessment In the Teaching-Learning Process," Research in Teaching, 11 4 (2023): 197-170, doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.139417.1827

VANCOUVER

Ahamdi, H., Shirbagi, N., Shirbagi, S. Teachers’ Understanding and Use Of Authentic Assessment In the Teaching-Learning Process. Research in Teaching, 2023; 11(4): 197-170. doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.139417.1827

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb