Exploring Affecting And Affected Factors By The Revision of Skill-Based Higher Education Curricula

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Fostering adept human resources capable of addressing the demands of the labor market and society is a fundamental goal of higher education institutions and universities. Curriculum programs, serving as the primary conduit for transmitting knowledge to students and forming the bedrock of a substantial portion of university education, play an indispensable role in shaping competent graduates adept at executing their job responsibilities. This objective can be achieved by designing and implementing well-aligned curriculum programs that cater to societal needs and conditions. Among the pivotal considerations in curriculum design is the significance of innovation and revision in curricula, alongside the synchronization of content and pedagogical methods with evolving circumstances. Revision and change are inseparable concepts from the curriculum. Nowadays, implementing modifications has become a daily reality in educational systems and educational revitalization sectors of various countries. These curriculum transformations, serving as the core of educational systems, must harmonize with society's emergent needs; otherwise, a decline in curriculum quality is inevitable. The recognized importance and compelling need for curriculum revision in the national higher education framework cannot be overstated. As society and industries evolve, it becomes crucial for educational institutions to adapt their curricula to meet the changing demands and requirements of the workforce. However, despite this pressing need, the practice of reviewing, adjusting, and enhancing curricula is often neglected within existing curriculum frameworks. However, curriculum revision holds a special significance, particularly in Iran. The University of Applied Science and Technology, tasked with providing skill-focused and professional higher education, is not exempt from this need; it's entrusted with cultivating skilled human resources aligned with predetermined visions and goals. Consequently, heightened emphasis on curriculum revision is requisite. The established curriculum structures and processes are often deeply rooted and resistant to modifications. This resistance can stem from various factors, including bureaucratic hurdles, lack of awareness about the necessity of curriculum revision, and the fear of disrupting established routines and traditions. This study delves into the investigation and identification of factors affecting and affected pertinent to curriculum revision within skill-based higher education programs in the nation.
This study adopted a quantitative approach and utilized a descriptive-survey methodology. The statistical cohort consisted of curriculum planners from comprehensive scientific-applied universities across four provinces: Tehran, Isfahan, East Azerbaijan, and Razavi Khorasan. Employing purposive sampling, a total of 66 individuals were selected as participants. These curriculum planners hold responsibility for crafting curriculum programs and have actively participated in curriculum design efforts. Given the absence of standardized questionnaires in this domain, a researcher-developed questionnaire was constructed based on theoretical foundations and prior research. The questionnaire comprised 17 queries and employed a Likert-type scale ranging from "no effect" to "very high effect," each assigned scores from 1 to 5. The questionnaire's formal validity was ratified by six curriculum experts, while its reliability was assessed through Cronbach's alpha, yielding a coefficient of 0.85. Data analysis employed Fuzzy Dematel and the Smart PLS software. The selection of the fuzzy approach stems from its ability to address uncertainties and ambiguities present in respondents' verbal responses. Consequently, employing the Fuzzy Dematel methodology, which necessitates a suitable linguistic spectrum for data collection, becomes essential. As a result, the initial presentation included an analysis of curriculum planners' responses concerning the influence of factors in each province. Subsequently, the designed model, utilizing the most influential factors for each element, was validated through the Fuzzy Dematel method employing structural equations and the Smart PLS software. The Fuzzy Dematel method is presented in the form of determining cause-and-effect relationships among influential factors in five steps, which are as follows: Step 1: Creating a measurement system for the relationships among factors. Step 2: Creating a matrix of direct relationships. Step 3: Normalizing the matrix of direct relationships. Step 4: Creating a matrix of direct and indirect relationships. Step 5: Calculating the overall sum of rows and columns.
The findings unveiled common affecting factors across the four provinces - Tehran, Isfahan, East Azerbaijan, and Razavi Khorasan. These encompass the alignment of curriculum with national human resource development policies, the imperative of curriculum adaptation and enhancement, the need for quantifiable course objectives, the significance of practical internships in refining student competencies, curriculum responsiveness to job requisites, and congruence with student admission criteria in various fields of study. Similarly, shared the affected factors across the mentioned provinces included course titles aligned with objectives and employable professions, practicum course guidance by centers and instructors adhering to the curriculum, synchronization of course outlines with contemporary technologies and sciences, and coordination between associate and bachelor's degree levels. The findings underscore the need to base curriculum design on problem-solving-oriented learning, critical thinking, and experiential learning to enhance skill acquisition, job responsiveness, and overall curriculum effectiveness. In essence, simulating classroom environments or conducting classes within industrial and workplace contexts can facilitate the realization of these objectives. Regarding the affecting factors in curriculum revision in each of the studied provinces, it can be stated that different prioritization in each province indicates the importance and necessity of focusing on curriculum alignment in higher education. This is because factors such as cultural and social diversity, human resources, available natural and non-natural resources in each province, the job market needs of the province, the diverse attitudes of individuals in each geographical region, and the stakeholders of curriculum revision, all play a role in guiding curriculum changes and revisions in each province. In order to adapt the curriculum goals to the required skills and professions of each province, the curriculum designers need to take these factors into account in the process of changing and revising the curriculum in each province.In general, factors affecting curriculum are considered prerequisites that must be taken into account during curriculum revision. Derived from perspectives of curriculum planners, these factors act as prerequisites for the affected factors in the curriculum, and as a result, focusing on effective factors leads to the reinforcement of the affected factors. For this reason, special attention to effective factors in enhancing, improving, and revising the curriculum of each province should be a considered by curriculum designers. In the present study, the findings extracted from the perspectives of curriculum designers serve as a roadmap and guiding light for the officials of the University of Applied Science and Technology in revising curriculum programs. Therefore, it is expected that the findings will be utilized for the purpose of correcting, improving, and reviewing the curriculum programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abedi, B., Baradaran, M., Khosravipour, B., & Ghanian, M. (2013). The necessity of reconsideration in agriculture curriculum planning with emphasis on the participation of faculty members, Journal of Agricutural Economics and Development Research, 44 (4), 569-579. [In persian]
Ahmed, A., & Kayis. B. (2007). A review of techniques for risk management in projects. Benchmarking, 1(14), 22–36.
Bandaranaike, S. (2018). From research skill development to work skill development. Journal of
Edson, A.J., Phillips, E., Slanger-Grant, Y., & Stewart, J. (2019). The Arc of Learning framework: An er-gonomic resource for design and enactment of problem-based curriculum. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 118 – 135.
Erkan Erman T., & Daneshvar Rouyendegh, T. (2014). Curriculum Change Parameters Determined by Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1744 – 1747.
Farahani, A., Arefi, M., & Shams Morkani, GH. R. (2023). Identifying And Explaining The Organizational Factors Affecting The Transfer of Students' Learning In The Internship Program Farhangian University, Journal of Research in Teaching, 11 (32), 35-60. [In persian]
Fathi Vajargah, K., Jamali Tazehkand, M., Zamanaimanesh, H., & Youzbashi, A. (2012). The Obstacles to Curriculum Change in Higher Education: Viewpoints of Faculty Members of Shahid Beheshti University and Shahid Behehsti Medical University. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11 (7), 768-778. [In persian]
Ghaderi, S. A., Karami, M., & Jafari Sani, H. (2014). Investigating and identifying the dimensions and challenes of implementing the new (revised) curricula of the technical higher education system from the point of view of the administrators, Journal of Skill training, 2 (7), 119-136. [In persian]
Ghoraishi Khorasgani, M. S., Ahmadi, P., & Samadi, P. (2021). Analysis of Experienced Curricula of the Skill-based Higher Education System; From the Perspective of students, Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum, 9 (17), 247-280. [In persian]
Ghorchian, N., & Saalehi, M. (2017). Designing a model to institutionalize future studies in Azad University, Danesh & Pazhuhesh dar Olum Tarbiati, 2 (2), 67-93. [In persian]
Gouda-Vossos, A., Sarkar, M., Thompson, C., Overton, T., & Ziebell, A. (2023). An Evidence-Based Approach to Employability Curricula and Transferable Skill Development: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.04
Heinrich, W.F., Habron, G.B., Johnson, H.L., & Goral- nik, L. (2015). Critical thinking assessment across four sustainability-related experiential learning settings, Journal of Experiential Education, 38(4), 373–393.
Hoernicke, M., Horch, A., & Bauer, M. (2017). Industry contribution to control engineering education: An expe- rience of teaching of undergraduate and postgraduate courses. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 50(2), 133 – 138.
Hossein Gholizadeh, R., Ahanchian, M. R., Kohsari, M., & Nofarsti, A. (2018). The experience of revising the educational management curriculum at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Journal of Higher Education Lette, 11 (40), 97-127. [In persian]
Jackson, D., Shan, H., & Meek, S. (2022). Enhancing graduates’ enterprise capabilities through work-integrated learning in co-working spaces. Higher Education, 84, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00756-x
Johnson, E. D. (2001). Principles of Effective Change: Curriculum Revision That Works, The Journal of Research for Educational Leaders, 1 (1), 5-18.
Kapur, R. (2023). Curriculum Revision: Indispensable in Educational Institutions of all Levels, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369304533_Curriculum_Revision_Indispensable_in_Educational_Institutions_of_all_Levels.
Khaghani Zadeh, M., & Fathi Vajargah, K. (2009). University curriculum templates, Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 1 (2), 10-18. [In persian]
Khosravi, M., Fat'hi Vajargah, K., Maleki, H., & Norouzi, D. (2013). An analysis of Acceptance of Curriculum Innovations in the Higher Education System: A Case Study of the Iranian Universities Curriculum Revision Bylaw, Educational Psychology, 9 (27), 136-168. [In persian]
Kombe, B. J. (2015). An Effective Curriculum Must Respond to Changes In Society, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/316693
Mohammadi, Sh., Heidarzadegan, A., & Balaghat, R. (2015). Evaluation of Modular Courses in the University of Applied Sciences and Technology based on labor market needs, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 21 (2), 25-41. [In persian]
Mohammadi, Sh., Parveen, E., Ghiathi-Nadoshan, S., & Khorasani, O. (2017). The pathology of the University of Applied Science and Technology by using the analysis of ANP and SWOT and Selection of an appropriate strategy (The case studies: the Applied Science and Technology of Zahedan), Journal of Educational Sciences, 23 (2), 177-198. [In persian]
Muravev, D., Hu, H., Zhou, H., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Location Optimization of CR Express International Logistics Centers, 12 (1), 2-25.  https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12010143
Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2017). Five guiding principles for curriculum change. Enschede: SLO. https://slo.nl/publish/pages/4560/five-guiding-principles-for-curriculum-change.pdf
Nourooz – zadeh, R., Mahmoodi, R., Fathi Vajargah, K., & Nave Ebrahim, A. R. (2007). The Universities Participation Status in Revising the Curricula Approved by the Higher Council for Planning, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 12 (4), 71-92.
Nyoni, C.N., & Botma, Y. (2020). Integrative review on sustaining curriculum change in higher education: mplications for nursing education in Africa, International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 12, 1- 8.
OECD (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation, 239, 1-59, Directorate for education and skills, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/efe8a48c-en Rahmani, R., & Mehrvarz, Sh. (2014). General Physician Curriculum Reviewing with Military Medicine Approach. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 7 (2), 99-105. [In persian]
Rahimi, E., Assareh, A., & Ahghar, GH. (2021). Status of components of Farhangian University undergraduate internship curriculum model (feasibility study), Journal of Research in Teaching, 9 (1), 127-155. [In persian]
Rahmanpour, M., & Nasr, A. R. (2017). A comparative study the process of reviewing the universities curricula in Iran and other countries, Research in Curriculum Planning, 14 (54), 35-49. [In persian]
Scholtz, D. (2013). Curriculum revision: Challenges in responding to change, 35 (3), 135-152.
Shafeai, R., & Babaie, B. (2019). A Survey of Educational Resources in Higher Education: The Case of Business Administration, Journal of Research in Teaching, 7 (1), 45-63. [In persian]
Shakhnoza, T., & Nargiza, D. (2022). Curriculum Improvement at Secondary Education, Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6 (1), 111- 119.
Thomas, I. (2009). Critical thinking, transformative learn- ing, sustainable education, and problem-based learning in universities. Journal of Transformative Education, 7(3), 245–264.
University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(4), 7.https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.4.7
Vaghari Zamharir, Z., Karami, M., & Jafari Sani, H. (2019). Challenges of revision and implementation of curriculum in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 25 (1), 123-147.
Vasquez, R.E., Castrillion, F., Rua, S., Posada, N.L., & Zuluaga, C.A. (2019). Curriculum change for graduate-level control engineering education at the Universidad Pontiļ¬cia Bolivariana, IFAC PapersOnLine, 52 (9), 306 – 311.
Wu, W.W., & Lee, Y.T. (2007). Developing Global Managers’ Competencies Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 499-507.
Wyness, L., & Dalton, F. (2018). The value of problem-based learning in learning for sustainability: Under-graduate accounting student perspectives. Journal of Accounting Education, 45, 1–19.