Identifying barriers to using flipped class in Iranian higher education

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Higher Education. Education and Psychology. Shahid Beheshti. Tehran. Iran

2 Assistant Professor. E learning. Higher Education. Faculty of Education and psychology of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor. Philosophy of Education. Education Leadership and Development. Faculty of Education and psychology of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The current literature on flipped classrooms offers limited insights into the motivations, perceptions, and challenges of educators, especially in higher education. The purpose of this qualitative study is to understand the motivations of teachers to adopt the flipped classroom method and the challenges and problems that educators face when teaching in the form of information in a public university. In this study, semi-structured interviews were used to collect information. Thirteen professors who had previously taught using the flipped classroom method were interviewed. Data were analyzed using content analysis method. Peer assistance was used to increase the reliability and validity of the analysis. The findings of this study showed several challenges related to the use of flipped teaching method in Iranian higher education: 1) managerial and structural weakness of the higher education system, 2) weak content required in the flipped classroom, 3) individual barriers in relation to knowledge and attitude And information of students and professors, 4) Weakness of technology. These findings could potentially be used as a guide for educators who want to use the flipped classroom method to improve their students' learning outcomes.
In the third millennium, with the introduction of information and communication technologies in the field of life, the proper use of educational systems from these technologies in teaching and learning is one of the major professional challenges in most societies (Parsa Moin, 2020). It is popular where activities that were traditionally done in the classroom (for example, presenting material) become homework and activities that were normally called homework become lesson activities. Akçayır et all., 2018) In the reverse classroom, the instructor helps students to take responsibility for the learning process instead of just providing information, and in fact promotes inclusive learning (Lai & Hwang, 2016). . Because class time is not used to impart knowledge to students through lectures, the instructor is able to engage with students through other learning activities such as discussion, problem solving suggested by students, helpful activities, and guidance. Today, the concept of reverse class is implemented in many different disciplines (mathematics, social sciences, humanities, etc.) and in schools and universities around the world (Hao, 2016). As a popular new educational model, the reverse class has attracted a lot of attention in recent years. Research on reverse class, especially in higher education, has increased dramatically. In general, the literature on this topic focuses mainly on the benefits and challenges of reverse classrooms (Ho & et all, 2018).
Researchers have discussed the benefits of inverted classrooms to justify their effectiveness. Another important benefit of such a classroom is that it can enhance active learning. In the reverse classroom, students are more involved in meaningful learning activities, self-centered learning, in-depth information processing, and achieving more learning (Lai & Hwang, 2016). The problem is used, which leads to deep learning (Maciejewski, 2016), citing self-centered learning theory, claiming that active presence in the reverse classroom may meet students' need for independence, solidarity and competence, and thus Improve students' motivation and learning. Flexibility is another benefit of the reverse classroom that is often discussed by researchers. Using step-by-step self-help videos enables students to quickly, at any time, place, confront themselves with pause, rewind, review, or video lectures (Karabulut-Ilgu, 2018). Regarding student participation in an inverted classroom, Qualifi concluded that the emotional dimensions of learning should not be underestimated. Dimensions such as peer commitment, recognition, a sense of security, and the coaching relationship are particularly highlighted as contributors to student learning (Steen-Utheim & Foldnes, 2018). Another study showed that reverse teaching method was more effective in students' learning than traditional (explanatory) teaching method (Mobaser Maleki & Kian, 2018).
Although the reverse classroom has many benefits for improving learning, it also has some drawbacks. Some studies do not support the effectiveness of the reverse class compared to the traditional class, or even show that the reverse class discussion undermines group learning (McClelland, 2013; Velegol, 2015;). The biggest challenge of using the classroom approach is the heavy workload created for faculty and students. Turning a traditional course into a reverse course creates a significant workload and workload for professors (Howitt and Pegrum, 2015). As noted (Wanner & Palmer, 2015), the actual time used to prepare a reverse class course is approximately six times longer than the preparation time of a traditional course. To effectively implement the reverse classroom approach, the instructor has to design the curriculum, including objectives, content, instructions, and reassessment. Teachers should prepare pre-class video lectures and in-class activities. Even their PowerPoint slides have been redesigned to make them better at online personal learning. In-class activities also require more investment from the instructor to design, monitor, guide and provide feedback. Students should also make more efforts for learner-centered. Students must complete significant amounts of preparation through class before entering class, including watching pre-class video lectures, reviewing other instructional materials, completing online tests, and completing extracurricular activities. In the traditional classroom, students need to discuss and engage with peers and give lectures to solve their academic problems. Therefore, facing a large amount of information along with the feeling of drowning in a lot of work will cause anxiety and frustration for students. They may not be interested in learning online, give up and resist classroom activities, and are therefore dissatisfied with the reverse class approach (Karabulut ‐ Ilgu, 2018). Another important challenge of using the class is The reverse lesson is the lack of theoretical and practical framework for the design and implementation of this model (Karabulut ‐ Ilgu, 2018), which creates a major obstacle and prevents educators from using this type.
A large number of experimental studies have focused on the effectiveness of flipped classrooms. A significant body of research has generally demonstrated the benefits of this educational approach in terms of improving student learning, including understanding, participation, learning approach, motivation, general skills, satisfaction, and academic achievement (Al-Zahrani, 2015; Zainuddin & Attaran, 2016; Hung, 2015). Researchers have discussed the benefits of flipped classrooms to justify their effectiveness. One of the most important benefits of such classrooms is that it can promote active learning. In the flipped classroom, students are more involved in meaningful learning activities, self-directed learning, deep information processing, and achieving more learning (Bishop & Verleger, 2013; Hwang & Lai, 2016; Davies, 2013). Moreover, class time is used more for social interaction, peer support, group discussion, and problem solving, which lead to deep learning (Hao 2016; Gilboy et al., 2015; Maciejewski, 2016). Abeysekera and Dawson (2015), referring to self-directed learning theory, claimed that active participation in flipped classrooms may fulfil students’ need for autonomy, solidarity, and competence, thereby improving students’ motivation and learning.

Keywords


Abdi, A. (2020).. Inverse class: educational efficiency and its effect on academic performance and students' perceived cognitive burden (Case study: Information Technology in Psychology, Payame Noor University). Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational Systems. 13(45): 45-58.. (Persian).
Abeysekera, L., and Dawson, P. (2014). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development. 34(1), 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.
Adnan, M. (2017). Perceptions of senior-year ELT students for flipped classroom: A materials development course. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 30(3–4), 2017.
Akçayır, G., and Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers and Education, 126(January). 334–345. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu. 07.021.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). “Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research”.Qualitative Research. 1(3): 385-405.
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., and Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for ‘flipping out’: a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 38, 15–21.
Bhagat KK., Chang CN., & Chang CY. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology and Society. 2016;19(3):134–142. [Google Scholar.
Chen LL. (2016). Impacts of flipped classroom in high school health education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2016;44(4):411–420. doi: 10.1177/0047239515626371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar].
Chen, D. T. (2003). Uncovering the provisos behind flexible learning. Educational Technology and Society, 6(2), 25–30.
Chen, F., Lui, A. M., and Martinelli, S. M. (2017). A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Medical Education. 51(6), 585–597.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., and Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education. 79, 16-27.
Clark, R. M., Norman, B. A., and Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2014). Preliminary experiences with “flipping” a facility layout/material handling course. In Y. Guan and H. Liao (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference. Montreal, Canada
DeSantis, J., Van Curen R., Putsch J., & Metzger J. (2015). Do students learn more from a flip? An exploration of the efficacy of flipped and traditional lessons. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 26(1):39–63. [Google Scholar].
Giannakos, M., and Krogstie, J. (2018). Putting Flipped Classroom into Practice: A Comprehensive Review of Empirical Research. Digital Technologies: Sustainable Innovations for Improving Teaching and Learning (27-44). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73417-0_2
Giuliano, C., & Moser, L. R. (2016). Evaluation of a Flipped Drug Literature Evaluation Course. American journal of pharmaceutical education 80(4):66. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80466
Green, R. D., and Schlairet, M. C. (2017). Moving toward heutagogical learning: illuminating undergraduate nursing students' experiences in a flipped classroom. Nurse Educ. 49, 122–128.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., and Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference (41–50). New York, NY: ACM.
Halili, H., & Zainuddin, Z. (2016). Flipped Classroom Research and Trends from Different Fields of Study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92.
Hardin, B. L., and Koppenhaver, D. A. (2016). Flipped Professional Development. An Innovation in Response to Teacher Insights. 60(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.522
Howitt, C., and Pegrum, M. (2015). Implementing a flipped classroom approach in postgraduate education: An unexpected journey into pedagogical redesign. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 458–469.
Hu, R., Gao, H., Ye, Y., Ni, Z., Jiang, N., & Jiang, X. (2018). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in Chinese baccalaureate nursing education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 79, 94–103. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.012
Kalavally, V., Chan, C. L., and Khoo, B. H. (2014). Technology in learning and teaching: Getting the right blend for first year engineering. In Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 565–570). Dubai, UAE: IEEE Xplore Digital Library
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., and Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398–411.
Kettle M. (2013). Flipped physics. Physics Education. 2013;48(5):593–596. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/48/5/593..
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., and Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
Lai, C. L., and Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self‐regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students' learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers in Education. 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006.
Lo, C. K., and Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for... Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(4), 1–22.
Lo, C. K., Lie, C. W., and Hew, K. F. (2018). Applying “First Principles of Instruction” as a design theory of the flipped classroom: Findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects. Computers and Education, 118, 150–165.
Maciejewski, W. (2016). Flipping the calculus classroom: An evaluative study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 35, 187e201. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrv019.
Margoniner, V. (2014). Learning gains in introductory astronomy: Online can be as good as face-to-face. The Physics Teacher, 52, 298–301.
Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., and Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 56 (4), 430-435.
Mcclelland, C. J. (2013). Flipping a large-enrollment fluid mechanics course—Is it effective? Paper presented at Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
McLean, S., McLean, S. M., Attardi, L., Faden, M., & Goldszmidt. (2016).Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains Adv. Physiol. Educ., 40 (2016). 47-55.
McLean, S., Attardi, S. M., Faden, L., and Goldszmidt, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains. Advances in physiology education, 40(1), 47-55.
Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., and Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the Classroom to Improve Student Performance and Satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52 (10), 597 – 599. doi:10.3928/01484834 – 20130919 – 03.
Mobaser Maleki, S., and Kian M. (2018). The Effect ofFlipped LearningMethodon Learningon Vocational Technology Courses. Journal of Research in Teaching. Vol6, No 2:1-14. (PERSIAN)
Moraros, J., Islam, A., Yu, S., Banow, R., and Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Medical Education, 15, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2
O’Flaherty, J., and Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85 – 95. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002.
Parsa Moin, K. (2020). Challenges and Insufficiency of Admission and Application of Information and Communication Technology in Islamic Azad University, Roodehen Branch. Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational Systems. Volume 13, Number 46. pp. 67-78. (Persian).
Plano Clark, Vicky and Cresswell, John W (1398). Combined research methods. Tehran: AIJ.
Sayeski, K. L., Hamilton-Jones, B., and Oh, S. (2015). The efficacy of IRIS STAR legacy modules under different instructional conditions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(4), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415600770.
Snyder C, Paska LM., & Besozzi D. (2014). Cast from the past: using screencasting in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies. 2014;105(6):310–314. doi: 10.1080/00377996.2014.951472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar].
Steen-Utheim, A. T., and Foldnes, N. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 307–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379481https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379481.
Sun, J.C., Wu, Y., and Lee, W. (2017), “The effect of the flipped classroom approach to open course ware instruction on students’ self-regulation”, British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3): 713-729, available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12444.
Talbert, R., and Valley, G. (2012). Learning MATLAB in the inverted classroom. Paper presented at Proceedings of 1119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX
Thai, T. N. T., De Wever, B., and Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers and Education, 107, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compe du.2017.01.003.
Velegol, S.B., Zappe, S.E., and Mahoney, E. (2015). The evolution of a flipped classroom: Evidence-based recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education. 4 (3), 1 – 37. Retrieved 21/03/2017, from http://advances.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/vol04/ issue03/papers/AEE-15-Velegol.pdf.
Wang, Y. H. (2016). Could a mobile-assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical Chinese learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 391–415. doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12141
Wanner, T., and Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers and Education. 88, 354–369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008.
Xu, Z., and Wang, L. (2009). Discourse analysis on hybrid learning and teaching and the changing roles of teachers and students in Hong Kong. Reflections and Innovations in Integrating. ICT in Education. Retreived.fromhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.212.9905andrep=rep1andtype=pdf
Zainuddin, Z., and Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students' perceptions of flipped classroom: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660–670.
Zainuddin, Z., and Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274.