• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Research in Teaching

  1. Home
  2. Designing a model for evaluating the elements of the educational curriculum in Shad Student Network

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Designing a model for evaluating the elements of the educational curriculum in Shad Student Network

    Authors

    • Ali Seyfi 1
    • Mohammad Mahmoodi Booreng 2
    • Mohamad Khosravi Tanak 2

    1 phd student of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Birjand, Iran

    2 phd student of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Birjand, Iran.

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.22034/trj.2026.137523.1580
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

The most important challenge of the global education system in recent years was raised at the end of 2019 with the outbreak of a new epidemic. Less than 1.6 billion people involved in the education system in more than 190 countries and on all of the world were affected by school closures, and Covid 19 led to some fundamental changes in social and organizational interactions. In this way, the Internet became the main tool used and replaced the previous traditional education. During the Covid 19 pandemic, e-learning has become an important alternative to reforming the entire traditional education system. Both teachers and students are forced to change their behavior, teaching / learning style, assessment methods, and so on. Other methods such as television broadcasts,online resources, instructions, online libraries, online channels, and video lectures were also introduced in response to the covid 19 pandemic to continue the learning process. Although the face-to-face learning experience can not be completely replaced, virtual learning learning devices can engage students in effective and meaningful ways to minimize learning disabilities.
social distancing in Iran, As in other countries, was followed by the closure of in-school courses, which prompted our country's education authorities to plan for teaching in new and virtual ways, as well as taking online exams. Therefore, e-learning can be considered a turning point in Iranian education due to the coronavirus. In Iran such as other countries, virtual education for students was conducted through television programs and social media on mobile phones. Television education was used to some extent in our country before it, but in March 1998, following the closure of in-school education in schools, the Ministry of Education designed and introduced an application (messenger) for the (SHAD) student education network. To make it possible to hold online classes through it. Student educational network (SHAD) with features such as channel, group, the possibility of presence and absence, live one-way and two-way communication, live class broadcast, in-app voice call, in-app video call, the ability to send and review assignments From the special section, holding an exam, creating a profile (student portfolio), Shadino with the ability to access multiple study resources, surveys, screen sharing with obs, classification was able to provide a relatively successful experience of educational social network in this field. Which was used by more than 13 million users.
Now, more than two years after the interence and expansion of the (SHAD) student education network, research and evaluation in this field can be effective for future activities related to the subject area. Therefore, considering that the design of a model creates a conceptual framework of a field that provides more knowledge and clarifies and clarifies its framework, territory and requirements. The purpose of the present study is to design a model for evaluating the elements of the educational curriculum in Shad Network and to evaluate it in order to be a guide for those involved and planners of the educational system.
The paradigm of the present study was pragmatic. Research method in terms of purpose, applied; In terms of data collection, the research method was in the qualitative part of phenomenology and in the quantitative part of the survey. The statistical population of the research was in the qualitative part of all teachers, school principals, educational leaders and education experts in South Khorasan Province and in the quantitative part included Educational and training leaders and educational group leaders (390 people), of which 194 people were selected based on the Cochran formula through stratified random sampling. The sampling method in the qualitative part was non-probabilistic and purposeful and up to saturation level. Accordingly, 12 individuals were more consistent with the purpose of the study. They were selected as a research sample in the qualitative section. The sampling method in the quantitative part was stratified random sampling. In order to collect data, a semi-structured interview was used in the qualitative stage and a researcher-made questionnaire was used in the quantitative stage. Qualitative data were analyzed using of Colaizzi's method. Quantitative data were analyzed using one-sample t-test. Based on the results of data analysis, the quality components of the education system in (SHAD) have 32 sub-components in the form of 8 components: infrastructure, support, learning system (SHAD network), teacher, student, educational content, teaching-learning process, Evaluations are segmented In the accreditation section, all components were examined. In the study of construct validity, the results of factor loads showed that the factor loads of all items were more than 0.4 and t-values greater than 1.96. Therefore, the validity of the structures is confirmed. Also, Cronbach's alpha of all components of the evaluation model of the quality of the teaching-learning process in the happy student network is estimated to be more than 0.7. Therefore, no item was removed from the model. Also, in examining the model fit, the results showed that the root value of the estimated variance of approximation error (RMSEA) is equal to 0.035 and less than 0.08. Also, the Adaptive Fitness Index (CFI), the Incremental Fitness Index (IFI) and the Good Fitness Index (GFI) have all been calculated appropriately. Then, in order to ensure the regulated factor structure, second-order factor analysis was used, the results of which showed that the statistical value of the teaching-learning process quality evaluation model in a happy student network with its components is significant and more than Is 1.96. Also, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the elements of the teaching-learning process quality evaluation model in the happy student network (0.912) has been calculated to be more than 0.7 and shows that the reliability of the structures is at a desirable level. The result of evaluating the education system in SHAD network in Khosf city indicates that the component of infrastructure with an average of 3.12 above the average, learning system or SHAD network with an average of 2.82 less than the average, teacher with an average of 3.12 above the average, Danesh Learner with 2.65 less than average, educational content with 2.76 less than average, learning process with average of 2.65 less than average, evaluation of teaching-learning process with average of 2.92 on average and support with average 82/2.

Keywords

  • Curriculum
  • curriculum elements
  • assessment
  • shad student network

Main Subjects

  • Education and teaching
  • XML
  • PDF 1.38 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Abbasi, F., Hejazi, E., & Hakimzade, R. (2020). Lived experience of elementary school teachers about the opportunities and challenges of teaching in the educational network of students (SHAD): A phenomenological study. Research in Teaching, 8(3), 1–24. (In Persian).
Ali Birghifard, ., Kargar, F., Salari, S., & Kargar, M. (2020). Educational education network (Shad). Journal of Applied Studies in Social Sciences and Sociology, 3(3), 53–66. (In Persian).
Amir Morādi, ., Saee, D., & Zarghāmi Hamrāh, . (2021). Barriers and strategies of using student social network (SHAD) in the teaching and learning of students during the corona outbreak: A phenomenological study. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 20(78), 35–60. (In Persian).
Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), 931–934.
Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).
Bazargan Harandi, A. (2020). Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods: Common approaches in behavioral sciences. Didar Publications. (In Persian).
Bi Bi Halifeh Davaji, ., Moghimi, Z., & Hajilo, V. (2021). The effect of Shad network e-learning program on teachers’ efficiency and students’ learning improvement. Managing Education in Organizations, 10(3), 51–78. (In Persian).
Bull, S., & Wasson, B. (2016). Competence visualisation: Making sense of data from 21st-century technologies in language learning. ReCALL, 28(2), 147–165.
Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367.
Fallah Hosseinabadi, F., Rahmani, J., & Alavipour Rafsanjani, A. (2021). Educational strategies for education in Iran during the COVID-19 period. Monthly Achievements in Humanities Studies, 4(35), 48–55. (In Persian).
Farzin, H., Jamshidian Mojavar, M., Amiri, M., & Khastar, A. (2020). Evaluation of virtual education status of biology course among 11th grade female students in Bojnourd. Research in Biology Education, 2(1), 19–28. (In Persian).
Fathi Vajargah, K. (2019). Basic principles and concepts of curriculum planning. Alam Ostadan Publications. (In Persian).
Gabrielle, D. (2003). The effects of technology-mediated instructional strategies on motivation, performance, and self-directed learning. In EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 2568–2575). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Ghasemi, A. R., & Shahriari Fard, A. (2016). Identify and prioritize indicators involved in the quality of e-learning. Educational Technology, 10(3), 207–218. (In Persian).
Ghorbankhani, M., & Salehi, K. (2017). Representation of the characteristics of successful virtual education teachers in the Iranian higher education system from the perspective of professors and students: A phenomenological study. Educational Technology, 11(3), 235–255. (In Persian).
Narenjithani, F., Pourkarimi, J., & Hejazi, S. (2021). Identifying the components of e-learning system at University of Tehran. Technology of Education Journal, 15(2), 321–337. (In Persian).
Rahbar Karbasdehi, F., & Rahbar Karbasdehi, E. (2021). Virtual education of students during coronavirus 2019 epidemic: Problems and solutions. The Journal of Medical Education and Development, 16(3), 224–225. (In Persian).
Roy, A. (2015). Barriers to e-learning in SMEs—Are they still there? In E-learning: Instructional design, organizational strategy, and management.
            Hamid Samimi Mehr, (1400). The Role of Shad Network in Academic Achievement of Dehdasht Students, Journal of New Research in Entrepreneurship Management and Business Development, 2 (1), 874-880. (In Persian)
            Hermenegildo, R. S., Silva, A. M. D., Costa, J. A. F. D., Queiroz, C. E. P. R. D., Barrete, P. M. A., & Gonçalves, J. E. C. (2015). A futura estratégia de segurança interna da União Europeia (2015-2020) e o papel da Guarda Nacional Republicana. Revista de Ciências Militares, 3.
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., … & Cao, B. (2020). Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet, 395(10223), 497–506.
Imani Jajarmi, H. (1399). Social consequences of the outbreak of coronavirus in Iranian society. Social Impact Assessment, Special Issue on the Consequences of Coronavirus 19, 2(1), 87–103. (In Persian).
Jia, H., Wang, M., Ran, W., Yang, S. J., Liao, J., & Chiu, D. K. (2011). Design of a performance-oriented workplace e-learning system using ontology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3372–3382.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). Technology outlook for Australian tertiary education 2012–2017: An NMC Horizon Report regional analysis (pp. 1–23). The New Media Consortium.
Jordan, K., David, R., Phillips, T., & Pellini, A. (2021). Education during the COVID-19: Crisis—Opportunities and constraints of using EdTech in low-income countries. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 21(65).
Keyvan Salehi, M., Ghasemi, M., Shalbaf, A., & Namdari, V. (2016). Analysis of cognitive themes of professors’ lived experience about the quality of virtual education courses. Journal of Applied Psychology Research, 7(1), 115–136. (In Persian).
Kondori, A., & Salehi, M. (2022). Content analysis of Shad Network educational videos and experimental science books of the first elementary course based on environmental protection education. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 10(2), 117–133. (In Persian).
Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271–283.
Mohammad Hassani, S. G. A., & Naveedy, A. (2021). Iranian teachers’ lived experience of virtual teaching in the early days of the coronavirus epidemic. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 12(1), 87–107. (In Persian).
Mohammad Lohrasbi, (2020). Chemistry training with the help of virtual laboratory in the corona era. Research in Chemistry Education, 2(2), 21–35. (In Persian).
Heidari, M., Alipour, A., Farzad, V., Ebrahimzadeh, I., & Zandi, B. (2013). Introducing the independent learning characteristics and skills (CSILM) model in e-learning system. Journal of Teaching Research, 1(1), 7–21. (In Persian).
Naidu, S. (2006). E-learning: A guidebook of principles (2nd rev. ed.). CEMCA. (Note: نام ناشر طبق داده‌ی توست).
Ng, W. (2015). New digital technology in education. Springer.
Ng, Y. M., & Or, P. L. P. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) prevention: Virtual classroom education for hand hygiene. Nurse Education in Practice, 45, 102782.
Ngumbi, E. (2021). Challenges of e-learning in higher education and possible solutions. Education & Child Development, 1(1).
Payton, S., & Hague, C. (2010). Digital literacy in practice: Case studies of primary and secondary classrooms. Futurelab. Retrieved from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/sites/default/files/Digital_Literacy_case_studies.pdf
Pennington, J. (2021). Forum guide to virtual education data: A resource for education agencies. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
Rajabi, M., & Soltani, H. (2019). Prioritization of key factors for e-learning success with AHP/CFA approach in the faculty of e-learning of Shiraz University. A New Approach in Educational Management, 10(2(38)), 237–265. (In Persian).
Rogers, F. H., & Sabarwal, S. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Shocks to education and policy responses.
Rostami Nejad, M. A., Zarei Zavaraki, I., & Mazini, N. (2016). Web-based education design. Birjand University Press. (In Persian)
Shakib, S. M. A., Bahonar, N., Bani Hashem, S. M., & Ali Shiri, B. (2021). The position of new media in the announced and executive policies of the Ministry of Education: Case study: Cyberspace. Quarterly Journal of Religion and Communication, 58(21), 179–210. (In Persian)
Si, M., Su, X., Jiang, Y., Wang, W., Gu, X., Ma, L., … & Qiao, Y. (2021). Prevalence and predictors of PTSD during the containment stage of the COVID-19 epidemic among college female students in China. (Journal name not provided in your text—APA needs it.)
Stemler, L. K. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6, 339–360.
Vila, L. E., Perez, P. J., & Coll-Serrano, V. (2014). Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter? Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 752–757.
Yahya Maroofi, M., Porjamshidi, M., & Moradi, H. (2016). Predicting students’ motivation through teachers’ technological literacy. Journal of Curriculum Technology, 1(2), 31–43. (In Persian)
Taghizadeh Ghavam, Z., Araghieh, A., & Khorshidi, A. (2017). Identify the constructive components of virtual education in high schools of the cities of Tehran province. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 7(3), 105–125. (In Persian)
Zamani, Z., Malaekeh, H., & Haghighatian, M. (2021). The relationship between digital media literacy and political satisfaction: Citizens of Tehran. Journal of Culture & Communication Studies, 22(53), 7–30. (In Persian)
Zinivand Nejad, F., & Navidi, A. (2021). Using the Shad system and teaching television during the corona outbreak: “Defects” and “Because and Why”. Educational Innovations, 20(2), 7–34. (In Persian)
Hamzeh Lou, Z., & Rahimi, S. (2020). Assessing the quality of education and learning in happy cyberspace from the perspective of elementary school students in the second semester of the academic year 2020. Journal of New Advances in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Education, 3(29), 1–14. (In Persian)
    • Article View: 128
    • PDF Download: 22
Research in Teaching
Volume 13, Issue 4 - Serial Number 43
December 2025
Pages 175-207
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.38 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 128
  • PDF Download: 22

APA

Seyfi, A. , Mahmoodi Booreng, M. and Khosravi Tanak, M. (2025). Designing a model for evaluating the elements of the educational curriculum in Shad Student Network. Research in Teaching, 13(4), 175-207. doi: 10.22034/trj.2026.137523.1580

MLA

Seyfi, A. , , Mahmoodi Booreng, M. , and Khosravi Tanak, M. . "Designing a model for evaluating the elements of the educational curriculum in Shad Student Network", Research in Teaching, 13, 4, 2025, 175-207. doi: 10.22034/trj.2026.137523.1580

HARVARD

Seyfi, A., Mahmoodi Booreng, M., Khosravi Tanak, M. (2025). 'Designing a model for evaluating the elements of the educational curriculum in Shad Student Network', Research in Teaching, 13(4), pp. 175-207. doi: 10.22034/trj.2026.137523.1580

CHICAGO

A. Seyfi , M. Mahmoodi Booreng and M. Khosravi Tanak, "Designing a model for evaluating the elements of the educational curriculum in Shad Student Network," Research in Teaching, 13 4 (2025): 175-207, doi: 10.22034/trj.2026.137523.1580

VANCOUVER

Seyfi, A., Mahmoodi Booreng, M., Khosravi Tanak, M. Designing a model for evaluating the elements of the educational curriculum in Shad Student Network. Research in Teaching, 2025; 13(4): 175-207. doi: 10.22034/trj.2026.137523.1580

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb