• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Research in Teaching

  1. Home
  2. The Concept of Self-Regulation Among Successful and Unsuccessful National University Entrance Exam Candidates: A Phenomenological Study

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

The Concept of Self-Regulation Among Successful and Unsuccessful National University Entrance Exam Candidates: A Phenomenological Study

    Authors

    • Mahboobeh Fouladchang 1
    • Fatemeh Dehghani 2
    • Maryam Ramine 3

    1 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

    2 PhD Student in Educational Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

    3 PhD Srudent in Educational Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.22034/trj.2025.143382.2165
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

This study examines the concept of self-regulated learning (SRL) among successful and unsuccessful candidates in the Iranian National University Entrance Exam (Konkur) and analyzes the factors influencing the development of this skill. Using a qualitative research design with a descriptive phenomenological approach, the study explores students' lived experiences in the process of self-regulated learning. The research framework is based on Zimmerman's (2000) self-regulated learning model, which conceptualizes SRL as a multidimensional construct encompassing cognitive, metacognitive, behavioral, and emotional components. The sample consisted of 20 students (11 girls and 9 boys) from public, private, and gifted schools in Shiraz, selected purposefully until theoretical saturation was reached. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Findings indicate that successful candidates employed more advanced SRL strategies than their unsuccessful counterparts. In the cognitive and metacognitive domains, they utilized techniques such as goal setting, structured planning, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and effective time management. They engaged in deep learning strategies, including summarization, concept mapping, and elaborative rehearsal, which facilitated comprehension and long-term retention. In contrast, unsuccessful candidates relied heavily on rote memorization and surface-level learning, struggling with comprehension, organization of knowledge, and adaptive learning strategies. In terms of behavioral regulation, successful candidates maintained disciplined study environments, adhered to structured study routines, and minimized distractions. They demonstrated high levels of perseverance, adapted their study methods based on performance feedback, and utilized external resources such as tutoring and study groups. Additionally, successful students demonstrated strong help-seeking behaviors, actively engaging with teachers, peers, and academic mentors to enhance their understanding of complex subjects. In contrast, unsuccessful students exhibited procrastination, lack of time management, and inconsistency in their study habits. Their inability to maintain structured study plans led to increased anxiety and lower academic performance. Many of them reported difficulty in sustaining attention for extended study periods and struggled with maintaining motivation, especially when faced with academic setbacks. Emotional regulation also played a crucial role in determining students’ academic success. Successful candidates employed effective stress management techniques, such as mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal, and relaxation exercises. They exhibited higher self-efficacy, a stronger sense of academic purpose, and resilience in overcoming challenges. Conversely, unsuccessful students experienced higher levels of stress and test anxiety, often displaying avoidance behaviors, low frustration tolerance, and emotional exhaustion, which negatively impacted their motivation and ability to sustain learning efforts. Environmental factors, including family support and school resources, significantly influenced students’ self-regulation. Those who received strong parental encouragement, academic guidance, and access to educational resources demonstrated higher levels of self-regulation. Family involvement played a vital role in shaping students’ study habits, as supportive parents provided structured study environments, emotional encouragement, and reinforcement of goal-directed behaviors. Schools also contributed by offering counseling services, mentorship programs, and structured academic plans that facilitated students’ self-regulated learning. In contrast, students from less supportive home environments faced additional challenges, including lack of access to study materials, unsupportive parental attitudes, and socio-economic constraints, which hindered the development of self-regulatory skills.

Furthermore, socio-cultural expectations surrounding academic achievement created additional stressors for students, particularly those from families with high academic expectations. Some students reported that family pressure to succeed resulted in heightened anxiety and fear of failure, which sometimes led to maladaptive learning behaviors such as excessive reliance on cramming or avoidance of challenging subjects. Findings also highlight notable gender differences in self-regulated learning. Female candidates demonstrated greater use of deep cognitive strategies, consistent time management, and emotional self-regulation compared to their male counterparts. They were more likely to engage in structured study practices, employ self-monitoring techniques, and maintain intrinsic motivation. Female students also exhibited stronger organizational skills, higher persistence, and greater reliance on social support networks, such as peers and teachers, for academic assistance. Their approach to learning was more systematic, with a focus on gradual mastery and iterative self-evaluation. In contrast, male candidates relied more on external motivators such as competition and social pressures and demonstrated greater flexibility in their study routines. They tended to engage in performance-oriented rather than mastery-oriented learning, showing a preference for efficiency over depth in study practices. While male students often displayed greater confidence in their abilities, they were more prone to overestimating their preparedness for exams, leading to discrepancies between perceived and actual performance. Additionally, male students showed a higher tendency to take academic risks, such as experimenting with different study methods or relying on last-minute revisions, whereas female students preferred structured, well-planned study schedules. The study emphasizes the necessity of incorporating self-regulation training into educational curricula and enhancing family and school support systems to strengthen students’ self-regulatory skills. Given the significant impact of stress on learning outcomes, implementing targeted interventions for stress management and motivation enhancement is essential. Psychological training programs that focus on resilience-building, cognitive restructuring, and self-efficacy enhancement can help students improve their emotional regulation and academic persistence. Additionally, gender-specific interventions should be considered to address the distinct learning tendencies and self-regulatory styles of male and female students. For instance, programs aimed at improving male students' engagement with deep learning strategies and structured time management may yield positive academic outcomes. Similarly, interventions focusing on boosting female students' self-efficacy and adaptive coping mechanisms can further strengthen their self-regulated learning capabilities. Moreover, promoting peer collaboration and study group participation can enhance both male and female students’ ability to self-regulate their learning, as collaborative learning environments often foster accountability, motivation, and shared problem-solving skills. The findings underscore the pivotal role of SRL in academic success and suggest that educational programs should be tailored to address individual and gender-based differences in learning strategies. By fostering self-regulation skills through systematic training, students can develop greater autonomy, resilience, and effectiveness in managing their learning. Future research should further explore the long-term effects of SRL training and investigate additional contextual factors, such as cultural influences, peer dynamics, and digital learning environments, that shape students’ self-regulation capacities. Moreover, longitudinal studies examining the development of SRL skills over time can provide deeper insights into the sustainability and adaptability of self-regulated learning strategies across different educational stages.

Additionally, further investigation into the role of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence-based learning tools and personalized adaptive learning platforms, may offer new opportunities for enhancing students' self-regulated learning capabilities in modern educational contexts.

Keywords

  • Self-regulated learning
  • self-regulation strategies
  • emotion regulation
  • gender differences
  • family

Main Subjects

  • Education and teaching
  • XML
  • PDF 1.2 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Amiri, A. (2020). Predicting academic achievement based on family performance, personality traits and self-concept in high school students. International Conference on Law, Psychology, Educational and Behavioral Sciences, Karaj. [In Persian]
Arafi, M. (2009). Comparison of self-regulation in gifted and normal school students and the predictive role of self-regulation dimensions in academic performance of students in Shiraz. Research in Curriculum Planning, 22, 75–98. [In Persian]
Aksan, N. (2009). A descriptive study: epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning.
Journal of procedural social and behavioral sciences, 1(1), 896-901.
Atılgan, D., & Aksoy, C. (2021). Investigation of COVID-19 phobia and satisfaction with life levels of students taking special talent entrance exams. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 5(1), 75-91.‏
Bakker, A. B., & De Vries, J. D. (2021). Job demands–resources and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 34 (1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
Bruce, W. T., Dennis, A. A., & Dennis, R. S. (2007). Learning and Motivation strategies: your Guide to success. Pearson Education.
Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of self-instructional training on self-regulation of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 401-410.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199-231.
Deighton, K., Hudson, J., Manley, A. J., Kaiseler, M., Patterson, L. B., Rutherford, Z. H., & Swainson, M. (2019). Effects of emotional intelligence and supportive text messages on academic outcomes in first-year undergraduates. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(4), 494-507.‏
Cernat, V., & Moldovan, L. (2018). Emotional problems and academic performance of students in manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 833-839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.118.
Carr, K., & Kellas, J. K. (2018). The role of family and marital communication in developing resilience to family-of-origin adversity. Journal of Family Communication, 18(1), 68-84.‏
Dyer, W. G. (2018). Are family firms really better? Reexamining "examining the "family effect on firm performan Family Business Review, 31(2), 240-248.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., & Meece, J. L. (1987). Gender differences in achievement: The role of ability beliefs and task values. Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17-30.
Fathabadi, J., Shalani, B., & Sadeghi, S. (2017). The impact of universities entrance exam on Iranian students and families, Cultural Psychology, 1(2), 49-71. [In Persian]
Fooladchang, M., Latifian, M., & Razaviyeh, A. (2006). Comparative study of the effect of self-regulation skills training and enhancement of self-efficacy beliefs on academic performance in high school students. New Thoughts in Education, 2(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2006.291 [In Persian]
Lavasani, M., Sadat Mirhosseini, F., Hejazi, E. & Davoodi, M. (2012). The effect of self-regulation learning strategies training on the academic motivation and selfefficacy. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 627-632.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 143-154.
Javdan, M., & Mahmoudzadeh Dehbazi, S. (2022). Comparison of self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance in students with healthy and unhealthy lifestyles. Cognitive Strategies in Learning Quarterly, 10(18), 203–222. [In Persian]
Klassen, R. M., Krawchuk, L. L., & Rajani, S. (2008). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 915-931.
Korhan, M. M., Engin, E., & Güloğlu, B. (2021). Test anxiety of youth to take the university entrance exam throughout Covid-19 outbreak: cognitive flexibility and self-regulation. Educational Research, 12(5), 212-231.‏
Lavasani, M. G., Mirhosseini, F. S., Hajizadeh, A., & Davoodi, M. (2013). The impact of self-regulated learning strategy training on academic motivation and self-efficacy. Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal, 29, 627–632. [In Persian].‏
Mann, L., Chang, R., Chandrasekaran, S., Coddington, A., Daniel, S., Cook, E., ... & Smith, T. D. (2021). From problem-based learning to practice-based education: A framework for shaping future engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 27-47.‏
Mohammadi-Darvish-Baghkaleh, M., Hatami, J., Ahadi, H., & Asadzadeh, M. (2012). Investigating the impact of self-regulation strategies (cognitive and metacognitive) on students' academic motivation. Applied Research in Behavioral Sciences, 12(4), 119-130.
Mettler, G. (1994).Cognitive basis for teaching cance travel.Journal of visual Impairment and blindness, 19,(45) 33.
Mohammadi, K., Rezaei, A. M., Mohammadifar, M. A., & Talepasand S. (2018). The structural model evaluation of t correlation of family functioning and parental abuse with students' academic achievement: The mediating role social adequacy and academic self-efficacy. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 18, 60-69. [In Persian]
Narimani, M., & Mousazadeh, T. (2010). A comparison between the metacognitive beliefs of gifted and normal children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1563-1566.
Omidian, M., Rahmati, A., & Farhaei Rad, H. (2018). Lived experience of entrance exam with emphasis on its stressful consequences. Iranian Higher Education, 10(2), 1-19. [In Persian]
Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of family therapy, 22(2), 144-167.‏
Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 116-125.
Pomerantz, E. M., Wang, Q., & Ng, F. F. Y. (2005). Mothers' affect in the homework context: the importance of staying positive. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 414.‏
Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. International journal of adolescence and youth, 25(1), 104-112.‏
Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2010). Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance: Longitudinal Models of Reciprocal Effects. Child development.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.‏
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of educational research, 31(6), 459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. Handbook of self-regulation, 451-502.
Rezaei, M. (n.d.). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategy training on reading comprehension and problem-solving. Congress of the Iranian Psychological Association. [In Persian]
Samadi, M. (2008).Ivestigating the Immediate and Sustainable Effectiveness of SelfRegulation Strategies Instruction on Self-Regulatory Strategies and Math Problem Solving Ability.Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovation, Vol. 7,27. 100-137. [In Persian]
Seif, A. A. (2013). Modern educational psychology. Douran Publishing. [In Persian]
Stubbs, N. S., & Maynard, D. M. B. (2017). Academic self-efficacy, school engagement and family functioning, among postsecondary students in the Caribbean. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 792-799.‏
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Self‐regulation and learning. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition, 7.‏
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2023). *Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications*. Taylor & Francis.
Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Shauman, K., Howell, L. P., Paterniti, D. A., Beckett, L. A., & Villablanca, A. C. (2018). Barriers to career flexibility in academic medicine: A qualitative analysis of reasons for the underutilization of family-friendly policies, and implications for institutional change and department chair leadership. Academic Medicine, 93(2), 246-255.‏
Taheri-Sartang, A., & Eskandari, M. (2021). The impact of time management on self-efficacy and academic achievement of Payame Noor University students in Izeh. National Conference on Management, Psychology, and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 979-994.
Trigueiro, E. S. D. O., & Leme, M. I. D. S. (2020). ESTUDANTES EO DOPING INTELECTUAL: VALE TUDO NA BUSCA DO SUCESSO NO VESTIBULAR?. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 24, e219948.‏
Warren, J. M., & Hale, R. W. (2020). Predicting grit and resilience: Exploring college students’ academic rational beliefs. *Journal of College Counseling, 23*(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocc.12145
Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Student adaptation to teachers' instructional strategies. Child Development, 73(1), 287-301.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). Macmillan.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., & Davis-Kean, P. (2002). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 933-1002). Wiley.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2013). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Routledge.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes. City University of New York Graduate Center, NY, USA.
Zimmerman, B. L. (2008). Effects of self-correction strategy training on middle school students’ self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and mathematics division learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-869
Zenko, Z., O’Brien, J. D., Berman, C. J., & Ariely, D. (2017). Comparison of affect-regulated, self-regulated, and heart-rate regulated exercise prescriptions: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 32*, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.06.007
    • Article View: 242
    • PDF Download: 202
Research in Teaching
Volume 13, Issue 2 - Serial Number 40
June 2025
Pages 86-113
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.2 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 242
  • PDF Download: 202

APA

Fouladchang, M. , Dehghani, F. and Ramine, M. (2025). The Concept of Self-Regulation Among Successful and Unsuccessful National University Entrance Exam Candidates: A Phenomenological Study. Research in Teaching, 13(2), 86-113. doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.143382.2165

MLA

Fouladchang, M. , , Dehghani, F. , and Ramine, M. . "The Concept of Self-Regulation Among Successful and Unsuccessful National University Entrance Exam Candidates: A Phenomenological Study", Research in Teaching, 13, 2, 2025, 86-113. doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.143382.2165

HARVARD

Fouladchang, M., Dehghani, F., Ramine, M. (2025). 'The Concept of Self-Regulation Among Successful and Unsuccessful National University Entrance Exam Candidates: A Phenomenological Study', Research in Teaching, 13(2), pp. 86-113. doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.143382.2165

CHICAGO

M. Fouladchang , F. Dehghani and M. Ramine, "The Concept of Self-Regulation Among Successful and Unsuccessful National University Entrance Exam Candidates: A Phenomenological Study," Research in Teaching, 13 2 (2025): 86-113, doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.143382.2165

VANCOUVER

Fouladchang, M., Dehghani, F., Ramine, M. The Concept of Self-Regulation Among Successful and Unsuccessful National University Entrance Exam Candidates: A Phenomenological Study. Research in Teaching, 2025; 13(2): 86-113. doi: 10.22034/trj.2025.143382.2165

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb