Document Type : Research Paper
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of implementing innovation in education is to provide solutions to the problems and challenges of the education system and to develop new methods to address these problems. Therefore, innovation in education is a means to effectively achieve other educational goals such as improving learning outcomes, increasing students' well-being, improving cost effectiveness and efficiency, reducing the gap in equitable access to education, improving the quality of teaching and learning, facilitating teachers' professional development and satisfaction. It is their job. To determine the effectiveness, it is necessary to have a format including dimensions and components at the disposal of researchers. Based on this, the aim of the current research was to identify and extract the components of evaluating the effectiveness of implementing innovation in education.
Statement of the problem: The level of efficiency of innovation, the way of accepting or choosing innovation plans, not paying attention to the existing and potential conditions for the correct implementation of innovation, incorrect implementation of innovation and failure to evaluate various consequences, as the most important reasons for the failure of innovations, especially in are considered the field of education. Surveys and studies show that in Iran's education and upbringing, most of the innovative plans and programs did not reach the desired result or were implemented incompletely or failed. Innovations and new plans are always created, but due to improper implementation, they have low effectiveness in the field of implementation. Although the importance of innovative and innovative plans in various fields, including in the field of education, is not hidden from anyone, but the fact should be kept in mind that the effectiveness of innovative plans depends on their proper and proper implementation. Based on this, the issue of the present research is what are the dimensions and components of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of innovative educational plans. Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations is an inevitable necessity to judge the success or failure of the innovation in achieving the primary goals and the consequences of implementing the innovation. Evaluating the effectiveness of innovation allows decision makers to know whether their innovation plans and other policy reforms have led to the desired changes. It also allows them to gain a better understanding of current practices and to think about the mechanisms through which the desired changes can actually happen. (Prenger et al, 2022) in a research entitled "How can educational innovations be sustainable?" They found that four factors influence the implementation leading to the sustainability of educational innovation. These factors include: the characteristics of the school organization, innovation, the person (teacher) and the contextual characteristics of the school. structural interpretation", innovation capabilities (personal and cultural characteristics), underlying factors (human resources and environmental factors) and facilitating factors (structural, strategic, organizational and managerial) as effective factors in agile They introduced the implementation of educational innovation. Therefore, the main problem of the current research is how to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of educational innovation? What are the dimensions and components of evaluating the effectiveness of implementing innovation in education?
Research method: The current research has used a qualitative approach with the strategy of qualitative content analysis. The reason for choosing the qualitative approach and qualitative content analysis strategy was that we were looking for the meaning and concepts and explanations available for the implementation of educational innovation in the context of the prevailing conditions of the country, which has a qualitative nature. The participants of the research included: four groups of members of the Cultural Revolution Council, editors of the fundamental transformation document, those responsible for the implementation of the document, and knowledgeable experts. The sampling method was purposeful using the strategy of critical cases, which reached 12 people based on the rule of data saturation. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and each interview lasted between half an hour and one and a half hours. Thematic analysis and Ethrid-Sterling method were used to analyze the research data. Based on the analysis, a network of themes including basic themes, organizing themes and comprehensive themes was formed. The basic themes included the key points and the smallest codes in the text. The organizing themes were obtained by combining and summarizing the basic themes that are similar and refer to the same theme. Finally, the overarching themes including the supreme themes governing the text as a whole were formed. For reliability, stability method (reliability between independent coders) was used, and negative case analysis and triangulation (consensus of researchers) were used for validity.
Findings & conclousion: Based on the findings of the research, there are four comprehensive themes including: characteristics of innovation, characteristics of users of innovation, characteristics of the organization implementing innovation, and characteristics of environmental elements affecting innovation in the form of 27 organizing themes and 160 themes. The basis for evaluating the effective implementation of innovation in education was identified and extracted. which shows that the evaluation of the effectiveness of educational innovation includes the dimensions and components extracted from the present research as follows: one of the factors affecting the effective implementation of innovation in education is the characteristics of innovation. An innovation must have characteristics such as originality, modernity, durability, importance, social benefits, feasibility, capacity to create change, simplicity and comprehensiveness. Also, according to the participants in the research, for the effective implementation of the educational innovation, the users of the innovation should have the characteristics such as thinker, effective human relations, motivation and sufficient competence. According to the participants in the research, the implementing organization should have characteristics such as sufficient organizational resources, support, networking support, positive attitude, transparency, management skills, history of effectiveness, organizational maturity, flexibility, decision-making. Being and independence of the organization. Finally, the participants in the research believe that an innovation should have characteristics such as physical, cultural, political, economic environment, creating learning opportunities in the environment, clear evidence, support and facilitation in the environment and networks to can be effective in implementation. Based on the findings of the research, were presented the necessary suggestions for researchers and policymakers in the field of innovation of education.
Keywords
Main Subjects
Akyürek, Muhammet İbrahim; Karabay, Ersoy (2022). Developing Innovative School Leadership Scale And Teachers' Views on Innovative School Leadership, journal of educational leadership and studies, 6, (1). 1-21. https://go.southernct.edu/jelps/files/2022-spring-volume6/8-Final.pdf
Altrichter, Herbert (2005). Chapter 2 Curriculum implementation – limiting and facilitating factors 1. Initiation Implementation Continuation Outcome. Linz.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research, Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
Azimi Far, Azam; Rezghi Rostami, Alireza; Haghighi, Masoud (2021).Identifying Factors Effective on Innovation Agility in Educational Organizations and Presenting Structural Interpretational Model, strategic studies in petroleum energy industry, (13),(49), 216-238. {in Persian}
Bharadwaj, Palash; Mohamed, A. Amsha, Falcone, T. W. (2003). Developing a learning organization: Training in public sector organizations, Scientific Journal of Administrative Development, 1 (1), 54 – 71.
Century, Jeanne, Cassata, Amy. (2014). Conceptual foundations for measuring the implementation of educational innovations. In Sanetti, L., Kratochwill, T. (Eds.), Treatment integrity: A foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology, p.p:81–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/14275-006
Fathi Vajargah, Korosh (2009). Principles and concepts of lesson planning, Tehran, Bal. {in Persian}
Gaspersz, Jeff,(2007) Compete with Creativity, NRG Working Paper No. 07-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=983934 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.983934
Gay, L. R. (1991). Educational evaluation and measurement (2nd ed) Maxwell Macmillan international: New York.
Güçlü Yılmaz, Ferah (2021). Evaluation of Innovative Approaches in Education and Training Practices and Solution Offers, journal of educational leadership and studies,5, (1), 1-20.
Hossienkhah, Ali (2008). The investigation of diffusion of innovation theory in education, Journal of educational innovation, (7), (26), 151-178. {in Persian}
Khosravi, Mahboubeh (2017). Identifying Curriculum Experts’ Viewpoints about Challenges of Innovation in Higher Education Curriculum through Q Method, curriculum researches, (7), (2), 120-144. {in Persian}
Khosravi, Mahboubeh; Fat'hi Vajargah, Kourosh; Maleki, Hassan; Norouzi, Darioush (2013). An analysis of Acceptance of Curriculum Innovations in the Higher Education System: A Case Study of the Iranian Universities Curriculum Revision Bylaw, educational psychology, (9), (27), 136-168. {in Persian}
Klein,Katherine J.; Sorra, Joann Speer (1996). The Challenge of Innovation Implementation, The Academy of Management Review, 21 (4): 1055-1080.
Laursen, Judith. K. (1980). Knowledge utilization what is it? Journal Knowledge, diffusion, utilization,1(3), 421-442.
Madadi, Rogayeh; Talebi, Behnam (2020). Structural An alysis of Teache r's Job Innovation Based on Transformational Leadership, Managing Education in Organizations, 8, (2), 83-102.
Mc Daniel, O.C (1998). Strategies for innovation in vocational education and training reform. Subgroup A.Available At: http:www.eduref.org.
Medase, Stephen Kehinde (2020).Product innovation and employees’ slack time. The moderating role of firm age & size, Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(3),151–174. 151-7410.1016/j.jik.2019.11.001
Mosapour, neamatollah; rastegari, narjes; Mehni, omid (2022). The Effectiveness of Clinical Education Implementation in Teacher-Training Curriculum on Professional Education of Student Teachers in Kerman University of Farhangian, journal of curriculum studies, (16), (63), 117-140. {in Persian}
Najafi, sohrab; Maroofi, Yahya (2020). Explaining Barriers of Acceptance and Implementation of Innovation in Farhangian University Curriculum, reaserch in curriculum, (17), (64), 61-76. {in Persian}
Nevenglosky, E. (2018). Barriers to Effective Curriculum Implementation. PhD dissertation of Doctor of Education. Walden university. College of Education.
Noroozi Chakoli, Abdolreza; abdi, sajedeh (2020). Challenges, issues and structural require elements for the implementation of the national system for evaluating the effectiveness of Science, Technology and innovation, rahyaft, 30, (77), 89-106.
Orenstein, Allan. C; Hunkins, Francis. P. (2017). Curiculum: foundation, principles, and issues, (7th edition), Pearson Education: London.
Palma, Josefa; Mera, Jéssica; Loor, Juana; Vergara, María (2020). Virtual Reality as a tool for educational innovation, Revista Electrónica de Ciencias de la Educación, 3(5), 215-226.
Pavie, Xavier.(2020). Critical Philosophy of Innovation and the Innovator, Wiley: New Jersey.
Posner, G. J. (1995). Analyzing the curriculum. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities Social.
Prenger, Rilana; Tappel, Anne; Poortman, cindy; Schildkamp, kim (2022). How can educational innovations become sustainable? A review of the empirical literature, Frontiers in Education, 7, (10), 1-19. DOI 10.3389/feduc.2022.970715
Saif, Ali akbar (2019). Educational measurement, assessment, and evaluation, Tehran: Duran. {in Persian}
Saif, Ali akbar (2022). Educational measurement, assessment, and evaluation, Tehran: Duran. {in Persian}
Salarvandian, Sima (2015). Evaluation of curriculum innovations based on the Everett Rogers model and comparison with old methods, Master's thesis, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University. {in Persian}
Salarvandian, Sima; Hossienkhah, Ali; Geramipour, Masoud (2016). Evaluation of the Smart Boards in Karaj’s Schools based on Evert Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Journal of theory and practice in curriculum, (3), (6), 29-62. {in Persian}
Toorani, Heidar; Aghaee, Amir; Manteghi, Morteza (2012). Investigation of the global experiences in educational innovations from the perspective of methods of production, adaptation and implementation of innovations in Iranian general education, journal of educational innovation, 11, (3), 7-41.{in Persian}
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2021). Program evaluation: Key terms and concepts [GAO–21–404SP]. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-404sp.pdf
Safi, ahmad (2006). Change and innovation in Iran's education and future prospects, quarterly journal of educational innovation, 1, (2), 109-126.
Vincent-Lancrin, Stéphan, et al. (2019), “Innovation and educational outcomes”, in Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin, et al., Measuring Innovation in Education 2019: What Has Changed in the Classroom?, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/99720182-en
Shahhossini, Ali; Kavousy, Esmail (2009). Innovation and entrepreneurship, Tehran: Aizh.