• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Research in Teaching

  1. Home
  2. Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Gifted Students and Suitable Instructional Activities for them: A Qualitative Study

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Gifted Students and Suitable Instructional Activities for them: A Qualitative Study

    Authors

    • Saeed Safdari 1
    • Mohammad Ghafari Mejlej 2

    1 Department of English, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran

    2 Department of Educational Sciences, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.22034/trj.2024.138978.1778
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Complications caused by individual differences such as interest, motivation, attitude and learning capacity have always been increasing. Many studies have been done on methods of teaching gifted and talented students. Some studies came to the conclusion that gifted learners should be trained in special classes and separated from the general curriculum. What is necessary in this process is to identify gifted students. In many cases, teachers are unable to recognize and identify their gifted students. Related studies about teachers' beliefs show the existence of a relationship between the framework of teachers' beliefs and their teaching methods in the classroom. The impact of teachers' superficial beliefs on their educational performance can be the cause of many problems. Therefore, in order to gain a deeper understanding and insight into teachers' beliefs about gifted students and the educational activities related to them in the classroom, the present research examines and explores this issue.

The importance of teachers’ understanding and definition of gifted students lies in the fact that teachers adjust the type of their teaching methods and instructional activities with the educational needs of the learners. Judgement criteria in this regard are ambiguous. The existing vague and imprecise set of beliefs is an important obstacle on the way to recognize the gifted and then to use appropriate instructional activities. In the studies that have sought for the characteristics of gifted students in Iran, attributes such as having a creative thinking style and challenging the norms, mental awareness, high self-efficacy, capacity for self-regulation, ability to solve problems with Proper efficiency, intelligent and skillful use of metacognitive strategies are mentioned as important indicators of giftedness. The fit between the talented students and the learning environment is crucial in order to achieve the optimal level of learning. Teachers have attempted to coordinate instructional activities with goals of the curriculum. They tried to do that through enriching and increasing the content and also by accelerating the process of advancing the curriculum to help talented students in accordance with their special capacities. Despite the lack of research in this field, some other effective activities can be found in the literature as well.

The current study was applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of method. The population included junior secondary level teachers working in the cities of Nowshahr, Chalous, and Kelardasht located in the west of Mazandaran province. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants in the research, and as a result, 14 male and female teachers of the seventh to ninth grades from seven different schools were recruited. Their ages ranged from 29 to 46 years with an average of 37, and their teaching experience was between 5 to 21 years with an average of 12.35. The data collection tool in this research was a semi-structured interview. The content of the interview questions was reviewed and approved by five experts in the field of education, who were university faculty members with long experience in research and teacher training. The participants took part in individual and face-to-face interviews. Each interview session lasted nearly an hour on average.

For data analysis, all interview sessions were carefully transcribed. Thematic content analysis method wiby using Nvivo 12 software was used to analyze them. For this purpose, both deductive and inductive approaches were followed. To ensure the validity and reliability of the research process, first, a part of the text of the interviews was presented to two experienced researchers as a sample and they were asked to code it. Then their initial codes were compared with the actual codes created in the process of data analysis. The calculated Cohen's kappa coefficient indicated the good quality of the coding process. In the next step, the results of the data analysis of each interviewee were shared with him/her and their approval was received.

The thematic content analysis of the conducted interviews, in the section related to the teacher's beliefs about gifted students, led to the emergence of 59 initial codes, 15 categories, and 4 general themes of cognitive ability, metacognitive ability, social skills, and classroom behavior. Also, in the section related to teachers' instructional activities, 47 primary codes, 11 categories, and 3 general themes of teaching methods, assignments and exercises, and teachers’ guiding role were obtained.

The findings showed that the participating teachers had a comprehensive understanding of the subject and do not suffer from one-sidedness and limited or stereotyped views. They did not only refer to the cognitive ability and intelligence of the gifted, but also to their learning skills and emotional and social dimensions. From this point of view, the findings of this research are significantly different from the findings of some previous ones. As far as the suitable instructional activities for the gifted are concerned, the educational methods and techniques that were mentioned in the interviews were a combination of the lived experiences and also the ideals of the interviewees. The teachers' beliefs indicated their relative agreement on the necessity of providing challenging content, giving more freedom and authority to gifted learners as well as to their teachers. The respondents also showed special attention to the beneficial role of group activities in enhancing the social skills of gifted learners and further motivating them. Finally, the issue of giving more autonomy and independence to such students alongside providing teachers with more freedom in planning and practice was emphasized tremendously.

The findings of this qualitative research study indicate that teachers have an acceptable knowledge and understanding of gifted students and consider their various facets in defining and understanding such learners. In addition, they have diverse and operational thoughts and ideas for teaching and training gifted ones, and if they encounter such students, they will probably have the ability to guide and lead them properly. It is suggested that teachers should be given the opportunity to express their opinions in group and professional meetings, so that they can exchange views about teaching talented students. Also, it is necessary to hold specialized training courses for teachers to familiarize them with gifted students and ways to identify and interact with them. Beside these, it will be useful to compile a set of teaching principles and techniques for the talented performers.

Keywords

  • gifted students
  • teachers&rsquo
  • beliefs
  • thematic content analysis
  • instructional activities

Main Subjects

  • Education and teaching
  • XML
  • PDF 1.17 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Abolghasemi, M., Zinalipour, H., Shikhi, A., Assare, A. (2018). Designing of optimum evaluation strategy among gifted students of isfahan: a mix method study. Journal of Research in Teaching, 6(1), 25-41. [in Persian]
Aboobakri Makoei S, Kaboli K, Qasemi S, Chagosaz M, Safa S, & Karami, S. (2021). Effect of short-term solution-focused approach on the coping strategies and mental toughness of outstanding students. JOEC, 21(1), 126-115. [in Persian]
Ahmadnejad, M., & Fathi, J. (2019). The contribution of an EFL blog-mediated writing course to enhancing learner autonomy. Journal of Research in Teaching, 7(2), 141-160. [in Persian]
Barbier, K., Donche, V., & Verschueren, K. (2019). Academic (under)achievement of intellectually gifted students in the transition between primary and secondary education: An individual learner perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2533.
Barbier, K., Struyf, E., & Donche, V. (2022). Teachers' beliefs about and educational practices with high-ability students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103566
Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2016). Teachers' conceptions of gifted and averageability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216647115
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brevik, L. M., Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (2018). Student teachers' practice and experience with differentiated instruction for students with higher learning potential. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.003
Civitillo, S., Denessen, E., & Molenaar, I. (2016). How to see the classroom through the eyes of a teacher: Consistency between perceptions on diversity and differentiation practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(S1), 587-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12190
Dare, L., & Nowicki, E. (2023). ‘The road less travelled’: Grade-level acceleration in inclusive schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 27(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1837265
Dare, L., Nowicki, E. A., & Smith, S. (2019). On deciding to accelerate: High-ability students identify key considerations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219828073
Eyni S., Hosseini, S. A., & Ebadi, M. (2022). Comparison of psychological distress, mindfulness and academic self-efficacy in gifted and normal students. Rooyesh-e- Ravanshenasi, 10(11), 1-14. [in Persian]
Fakharian, J., Yaghoubi, A., Zargham Hajebi, M., & Mohagheghi, H. (2019). The designing of academic buoyancy model based on family emotional climate, social constructive learning environment, and academic engagement mediated by academic self-efficacy in high school girl students. Journal of Research in Teaching, 7(3), 1-25. [in Persian]
Guez, A., Peyre, H., Le Cam, M., Gauvrit, N., & Ramus, F. (2018). Are high-IQ students more at risk of school failure? Intelligence, 71, 32-40.
Hashemi, N., & Khorouti, F. (2020). Comparison of the academic motivation, self-regulation and self- worth of the gifted and normal students in Karaj. Educational Innovations, 19(1), 147-162. [in Persian]
Hejazi, E., Abbasi, F., Hakimzadeh, R., & Ejei, J. (2021). Flourishing profile of gifted students based on Seligman's PERMA model: A study of gender differences. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 17(4), 221-240. [in Persian]
Heller, K. A., M€onks, F. J., Subotnik, R., & Sternberg, R. (2000). International handbook of giftedness and talent. Elsevier.
Heshmati, R., & Maanifar, S. (2018). Metacognition, mindfulness, and spiritual well-being in gifted high school students. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics, 5(3), 22-28. [in Persian]
Hornstra, L., Bakx, A., Mathijssen, S., & Denissen, J. (2020). Motivating gifted and non-gifted students in regular primary schools: A self-determination perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101871
Isazadegan, A., Mika’ili Mani, F., Jenabadi, H., & Qolinejad, F. (2013). A comparison of thinking styles and emotional creativity between gifted and ordinary students. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 3(11), 107-126. [in Persian]
Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & M€oller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.06.001
Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554235
Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607
Lavrijsen, J., & Verschueren, K. (2020). Student characteristics affecting the recognition of high cognitive ability by teachers and peers. Learning and Individual Differences, 78, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101820
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.137
Machts, N., Kaiser, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., & M€oller, J. (2016). Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003
Mahmoodi, Z., & Kadivar, P. (2019). The school climate and emotional intelligence in gifted and non-gifted students: A multilevel analysis.  Innovation and Creativity in Human Sciences, 8(4), 219-256. [in Persian]
Moradizadeh S., Bazgir, L., & Sepahvand, E. (2019). Study and comparison of emotional, social, educational, self-regulation and test anxiety among gifted and normal boy students in Khoramabad city. Rooyesh-e- Ravanshenasi, 8(7), 39-48. [in Persian]
Nazarian, M. R., Abedi, A., Mahdad, A., & Nadi, M. A. (2020). Teachers’ lived experiences in identifying students’ talents based on the dimensions and components of the effective teaching pattern. New Educational Approaches, 15(2), 43-58. [in Persian]
Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. (2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003
Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers' instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205-242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198
Popa, N. L., & Pauc, R. L. (2015). Dynamic assessment, potential giftedness and mathematics achievement in elementary school. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(2), 23-32.
Pourmand, R., Norozi, D., Zarei Zavaraki, E., & Delavar, A. (2017). Investigating the effect of the group teaching method on simultaneous learning of common topics with different complexity levels on students learning in multigrade classes. Journal of Research in Teaching, 5(3), 23-37. [in Persian]
Preckel, F., Baudson, T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1160-1184. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215596413
Reis, S. M., & Peters, P. M. (2020). Research on the schoolwide enrichment model: Four decades of insights, innovation, and evolution. Gifted Education International, Article 0261429420963987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420963987
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012
Richards, J., Encel, J., & Shute, R. (2003). The emotional and behavioural of intellectually gifted adolescents: A multi-dimensional, multi-informant approach. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163889
Ridgley, L., Rubenstein, L., & Callan, G. (2020). Gifted underachievement within a self-regulated learning framework: Proposing a task-dependent model to guide early identification and intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 57(9), 1365-1384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22408
Sayadi, Y., & Soleimani, H. (2022). Investigating the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic enthusiasm with regard to the mediating role of self-regulation among English language students. Journal of Research in Teaching, 10(1), 81-106. [in Persian]
Scager, K., Akkerman, S. F., Pilot, A., & Wubbels, T. (2014). Challenging high-ability students. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 659-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03075079.2012.743117
Schiefer, J., Stark, L., Gaspard, H., Wille, E., Trautwein, U., & Golle, J. (2021). Scaling up an extracurricular science intervention for elementary school students: It works, and girls benefit more from it than boys. Journal of Educational Psychology. 113(4), 784-807. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000630
Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2008). Identifying Gifted Students: Educator Beliefs regarding Various Policies, Processes, and Procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(2), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-850
Schuitema, J., Palha, S., van Boxtel, C., & Peetsma, T. (2019). Effects of task structure and group composition on elaboration and metacognitive activities of highability students during collaborative learning. Pedagogische Studies, 96(2), 136-151.
Sepahvand, T., & Mirchenari, M. (2020). Comparison of self-regulated learning strategies and implicit beliefs of intelligence in gifted and normal second high school students. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 8(15), 145-160. [in Persian]
Shabani Z, Ghanbari Panah M, & Abolghasemi, M. (2021). Comparison of metacognitive beliefs, mind control strategies and documentary styles in outstanding and normal students. Exceptional Children, 21(3), 79-92. [in Persian]
Sharp, J. E., Niemiec, R. M., & Lawrence, C. (2017). Using mindfulnessbased strengths practices with gifted populations. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 131-144.
Snyder, K., & Wormington, S. (2020). Gifted underachievement and achievement motivation: The promise of breaking silos. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 63-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220909179
Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K-12 students' academic achievement: Findings of two secondorder meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849-899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163807
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
van Dijk, A. M., Eysink, T. H. S., & de Jong, T. (2016). Ability-related differences in performance of an inquiry task: The added value of prompts. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.008
Van Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2020). An analysis of research on inclusive education: A systematic search and meta review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24, 675-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2018). Achievement unlocked: Effective curriculum interventions with low-income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 68-82.
Verschueren, K., Lavrijsen, J., Weyns, T., Ramos, A., & Fraine, B. (2019). Social acceptance of high-ability youth: Multiple perspectives and contextual influences. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168, 27-46 https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20316, 2019.
Weyns, T., Preckel, F., & Verschueren, K. (2020). Teachers-in-training perceptions of gifted children's characteristics and teacher-child interactions: An experimental study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103215
Zamani, A., Pouratashi, M., Bagherianfar, M. (2023). The relationship between faculty members' teaching styles with students' academic enthusiasm and academic performance. Journal of Research in Teaching, 11(3), 150-175. [in Persian]
Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2017). Emotional intelligence in gifted students. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 163-182.
    • Article View: 552
    • PDF Download: 483
Research in Teaching
Volume 12, Issue 1 - Serial Number 35
March 2024
Pages 49-75
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.17 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 552
  • PDF Download: 483

APA

Safdari, S. and Ghafari Mejlej, M. (2024). Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Gifted Students and Suitable Instructional Activities for them: A Qualitative Study. Research in Teaching, 12(1), 49-75. doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.138978.1778

MLA

Safdari, S. , and Ghafari Mejlej, M. . "Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Gifted Students and Suitable Instructional Activities for them: A Qualitative Study", Research in Teaching, 12, 1, 2024, 49-75. doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.138978.1778

HARVARD

Safdari, S., Ghafari Mejlej, M. (2024). 'Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Gifted Students and Suitable Instructional Activities for them: A Qualitative Study', Research in Teaching, 12(1), pp. 49-75. doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.138978.1778

CHICAGO

S. Safdari and M. Ghafari Mejlej, "Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Gifted Students and Suitable Instructional Activities for them: A Qualitative Study," Research in Teaching, 12 1 (2024): 49-75, doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.138978.1778

VANCOUVER

Safdari, S., Ghafari Mejlej, M. Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Gifted Students and Suitable Instructional Activities for them: A Qualitative Study. Research in Teaching, 2024; 12(1): 49-75. doi: 10.22034/trj.2024.138978.1778

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb