تجارب زیسته معلمان از آسیب‌ها و چالش‌های برنامة درسی کلاس‌های چندپایة دورة ابتدایی (مطالعه‌ای پدیدارشناسی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

3 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف توصیف تجارب زیسته معلمان از آسیب‌ها و چالش‌های برنامة درسی کلاس‌های چندپایه دورة ابتدایی انجام شد. مطالعه حاضر در سال تحصیلی 98-99 با رویکرد کیفی، از نوع پدیدار شناسانه، با نمونه گیری هدف‌مند و با مصاحبه عمیق نیمه ساختار یافته با 19 نفر از معلمان کلاس‌های دورة ابتدایی استان آذربایجان شرقی انجام گرفت. راهبردهای اعتباربخشی به داده‌ها با استفاده از چندسویه‌سازی، بازبینی اعضاء و درگیری طولانی مدت پژوهشگر در جریان مصاحبه انجام شد. در این پژوهش ابتدا کدهای باز و جزیی شناسایی شده و با کنار هم قراردادن آن‌ها بر اساس روابط بین آن‌ها کدهای محوری و کلی تر ایجاد شده‌اند پس از این روند استقرایی، مجددآً کدهای باز شناسایی شده و کدهای بازی که بعدً شناسایی شدند به صورت انتخابی در زیر مفاهیم محوری ایجاد شده یا مفاهیم محوری‌ای که بعداً ایجاد و یکپارچه شدند قرار گرفتند. تجزیه و تحلیل متن مصاحبه‌ها به صورت دستی و با استفاده از الگوی کلایزی انجام شد. یافته‌ها‌ی تحقیق نشان داد که چالش اصلی کلاس‌های چندپایه، استفاده ‌نکردن از معلمان با سواد تخصصی کلاس‌های چندپایه، نبود مدیریت نظام جبران خدمات مناسب معلمان، چالش‌های جانبی کلاس‌های چندپایه و محاسن و معایب کلاس‌های چندپایه می‌باشد. مطابق با یافته‌ها، این نتیجه بدست می‌آید که می‌توان با طراحی الگوی مناسب آموزش در کلاس های چندپایه و بکارگیری نظام مناسسب جبران خدمات، بر اغلب چالش های کلاس‌های چندپایه غالب شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Teachers' Lived Experiences of Harms and Curriculum Challenges in Elementary Multi-Grade Classrooms (Phenomenological Studies)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rahman Badri 1
  • Firooz Mahmodi 2
  • Ali Imanzadeh 2
  • Yosef Adib 3
1 Ph.D. candidate in Curriculum Studies, Department of Education, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Curriculum Studies, Department of Education, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 Professor of Curriculum Studies, Department of Education, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Multi-grade classrooms are organizations in which students of different ages are in the same class together. Some multi-grade teachers may teach two grades, but some teach three, four, or five, and in the new national curriculum, six grades; In other words, a multi-grade class is a situation in which a teacher teaches multiple grades simultaneously or separately in one session. Given the increasing trend of rural-urban migration, as well as the slowdown in population growth in these areas and the lack of a quorum for independent classes in these areas, an increase in the number of these classes will be inevitable in the future.
A number of researches shows that, in most countries, including Iran, multi-grade classes have a long history, however, in some countries this issue has been ignored and in some cases has decreased; While in other countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines, positive steps have been taken in this regard, which has led to a new period in the history of teaching multi-grade classes in these countries; Because the researches show that, the category of multi-grade classes is not a temporary thing that will not be needed in the future. But according to the statistics, in our country, multi-grade classes and the number of students studying in these classes, are increasing; while in the educational system of the country, basic principles have not been developed for the effective administration of these classes. On the other hand, due to the fact that these classes face many problems, they also have many strengths that if the desired model of the curriculum of multi-grade classes is designed, it can be provided that such a challenging situation becomes a valuable educational opportunity. According to the UN Charter of Human Rights, access to basic education remains an inalienable human right; therefore, a qualitative move towards optimal and efficient education in the education system is obvious and necessary. Also one of the important factors is the development of any society of resources and manpower and how to train them according to the realities of multi-grade classrooms, such as lack of flexible curriculum, disproportionate national curriculum content, lack of flexible schedule, classroom management problems from many subjects and etc. trying to find shortcuts in addition to the quality of performance of multi-grade classes is mandatory. On the other hand, the Iranian education system, following the decentralization of planning as well as structurally, has considered decentralized educational planning. The multi-level educational approach, despite its opportunities, always faces challenges that by covering and minimizing those the lofty goals of education as well as multi-level classes are achievable. One of the most important challenges that has occupied the minds of many researchers is the adaptation of the multi-level curriculum. In multi-level teaching, the teacher must use two or more educational programs in different grades and at the same time; for this reason, multi-grade classes are not desirable for teachers and educational officials, but in certain circumstances, the use of these classes seems necessary and reasonable. Consider multi-grade classes the educational system faces various challenges in achieving its goals for various reasons, including the existence of a significant number of schools and multi-grade classes in the country. Diversity of educational levels, small classroom environment, lack of teaching materials, and educational equipment are among the problems that prevail in such educational environments. Also take multilevel education, is a symbol of educational, training, and administrative programs of education system in the form of providing services in these areas. The experiences of countries such as Ghana and Sudan confirm their extensive attention to the curricula of multi-grade classes and planning for the optimal use of these classes. Experience gained in Australia, Bangladesh, People's Republic of China, India, Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand, etc. show that, elementary education scheduling and list of minimum educational abilities are not designed and prepared for multi-grade classes. According to research, multigrade classes are associated with problems. In conclusion, issues such as rural migration, ethnic prejudices, increasing the age of marriage, declining population, dispersal of villages, lack of skilled manpower, increasing the base repetition rate, etc. have expanded multi-grade classes in rural areas of the country.The present study was conducted in the 98-99 academic year with a qualitative approach, phenomenological type, purposeful sampling, and in-depth semi-structured interviews with 19 primary school teachers in East Azerbaijan province. Each interview lasted 90 minutes. By listing the researchers' assumptions that were the result of experience and study, their impact on the research outcome was prevented before data collection and during the work. Data validation strategies were performed using multidimensionality, member review, and the researcher's long-term involvement during the interview. Training participants were asked in different ways. Since the data collection method in this study was in-depth interview method, it was tried to conduct the interviews accurately and without bias in order to ask sufficient contents about the questions. Also, to ensure the reliability of the researcher's data analysis, they consulted with each of the experts and asked their opinion on whether the comprehensive and final description of the findings reflects their experience or not. The main method of maintaining the validity and reliability of the data in this study was to record interviews and confirm the final descriptions by experts. The argumentative approach to data analysis and interpretation in this section has also been inductive-deductive. This means that first open and partial codes are identified and by putting them together based on the relationships between them, central and more general codes are created. After this inductive process, open codes are re-identified. Below are the pivotal concepts created or pivotal concepts that were later created and integrated. The text of the interviews was analyzed manually using the Colaizzi model. Findings showed that the main challenge of multi-grade classrooms are lack of specialized teachers of multi-grade classrooms, lack of management system of compensation for proper teacher services, side challenges of multi-grade classrooms and the advantages and disadvantages of multi-grade classrooms. According to the findings, it can be concluded that most of the challenges of multi-grade classes can be overcome by designing an appropriate model of education in multi-grade classes and using an appropriate service compensation system.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Curriculum Challenges
  • Multi-Grade Classes
  • Multi-Grade Teacher Experiences
Abdi. H. (2004). Investigate the educational problems of multi-grade classes. Report of the research project of the Azerbaijan Education Organization.
Aghazadeh. M., and Fazli. R. (2010). Teaching Guide in Multi-Grade Classrooms. Ayizh Publications. [In Persian].
Anari Nejad. A., and Reyhanpour. M. (2015). Management and curriculum planning of multi-grade classes "(according to the title of Farhangian University and approved by the Ministry of Science. Research and Technology). University Press. [In Persian].
Azizi. N., and Panahi. Kh. (2013). Comparison of academic achievement of second grade elementary students in multi-grade classes with normal school students in Persian language skills. Teaching and Learning Research. 20 (3): 194-179. [In Persian].
Brown. S. C. (1998). Learning Across the Campus: How College.
Burke. J. (Ed.). (2005). Competency based education and training. Routledge.
Cornish. L., and Jensen. V. (2006). Multi-grade teaching: A tool for getting girls into school. In Reaching EFA through multi-grade teaching: Issues. contexts and practices. Kardoorair Press.
Danaeifard. H. (2017). Multi-Grade Classroom Research Studies. Journal of Multi-Grade Classroom Pathology. 257. [In Persian].
Ezzati. Kh. (2020). A study of teaching methods and strategies in multi-grade classes with emphasis on self-directed learning method. Quarterly Journal of Management Research in the Islamic World: 2 (2): 61-90. [In Persian].
Faraji. A. (2000). Assessing the educational quality of multi-grade elementary school classes. Research project report. East Azerbaijan Education Organization. [In Persian].
Fazli. R. (2003). Teacher. Classroom - Newly Old Teacher Development Magazine. 179: 50-52. [In Persian].
Hirsch. W. Z.. Segelhorst. E. W., and Marcus. M. J. (1964). Spillover of public education: costs and benefits. University of California.
Khademi. S. (2017). Manage multi-grade classes. Studies in Psychology and Educational Sciences.24: 156-145. [In Persian].
Kiai. F. (2003). An Introduction to Multilevel Classes in Teacher Development Magazine. 236. 14-16. [In Persian].
Little، A (2008). "Education for All and Multigrade Teaching :Challenges and Opportunities. Compare": A Journal of Comparative and International Education، 38 (4):505 – 507.
Madadi Imamzadeh, Z. (2004) Comparison of social skills. self-esteem and academic achievement between students (boys and girls) of multi-grade and regular classes in the elementary school of the 2003-2004 academic year. Master's thesis. Department of Psychology. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Tehran Teacher Training University. [In Persian].
Makosana. C., and Kapisa. M. (2007). Multi-Learning Tutorial. Translated by Muharram Aghazadeh. Ayizh Publications. [In Persian].
Manjula. V. (2006). Adapting the primary mathematics curriculum to the multigrade classroom in rural Sri Lanka. EDUCATION FOR ALL AND MULTIGRADE TEACHING: 127-153.
Masello، P. (2014)." Possibilities and Challenges of Teaching Reading in a Multi-Grade Classroom". Mediterranean Journal Sciences MCSER Publishing، Rome-Italy of Social.5(15):359-365.
McMahon.W. (2011). Spillover Effects and Option Value in Education. College of Commerce and Business Administration University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign.
Mileng. K., and Lipu.J. (2002). Module MG.3 Teaching in the Multigrade Classroom. Australian Agency for International Development.
Mir Shafiee. S. D. (2015). A special situation called multilevel (teaching method in multilevel classes in elementary school). Tehran: The growth of thought. [In Persian].
Momeni. Farshad., and Farzaneh. Ch. (2012). The Institutional Position of Basic Education in Knowledge-Based Development. Quarterly. Policy. Science and Technology. 2 (1): 67-80. [In Persian].
Okamoto. Y. (2020). Opportunities and Challenges in Multigrade Teaching Using Direct and Indirect Teaching Methods with Zurashi and Watari Approaches in the Philippines: Kagay-Anon Ria Schools Experiences (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 3652738). Social Science Research Network. Rochester. NY.
Pat Pridmore. (2007). "Adapting the primary‐school curriculum for multigrade classes in developing countries: a five‐step plan and an agenda for change،" Journal of Curriculum Studies، 39:5، 559-576، DOI: 10.1080/00220270701488093.
Pridmore.P., and.Son Vu. W.T. )2006(.Adapting the curriculum for teaching Health in multigrade classes in vientnam. In Little. A.W.(ed.). Education for all and multigrade teaching: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer. Pp 169- 191.
Rabbani Golpayegani. A. (2002). Edmund Husserl Phenomenology and Hermeneutics. Islamic Theology. 42. [In Persian].
Rezaei. (1999). Planning. teaching and managing multi-grade classes. in the associate degree of teacher training. Iran Publishing Company. [In Persian].
Salehi. Z. (2001). Comparison of teachers 'efficiency and effectiveness and students' academic success in multi-grade classes. report of the research project of the Azerbaijan Education Organization. [In Persian].
Samadian. S. (2008). Comparing the educational status of multi-grade classes with singlegrade classes. Research project report. East Azerbaijan Education Organization. [In Persian].
Samadian. Sd. (2017). Curriculum planning for multi-grade classes. Tehran: Molyan Scent Emission. [In Persian].
Seban.D. (2015). Development of preservice identities: learning from a multigrade classroom practicum context. Journal of Education for Teaching.41(1):19-36.
Sepahvand. A. (2017). Teaching strategies in multi-grade classes: space arrangement. teacher assistant. importance to sports and art courses. International Conference on Social Sciences. Education. Humanities and Psychology. [In Persian].
Seyed Kalan. S. M., and Heidari. A. (2020). Evaluation of management of multi-grade classrooms in primary schools from the perspective of educational leaders. Dynamics in educational sciences and counseling. 6 (13): 1-18. [In Persian].
Shamsi. E., and Eftekhari. H. (2020). Multi-grade classes; challenges. shortcomings. solutions. the first national conference on applied research in education processes. Minab. [In Persian].
Shareefa. M.(2021). Using differentiated instruction in multigrade classes: a case of a small school. Asia Pac. J. Educ. 41. 167–181.
Thaba. -Nkadimene Kgomotlokoa L, Modiba. N.S., and Molotja. T.W. (2019). Examination of the influence of instructional leadership to multi-grade teaching in primary schools nations. Afr. Renaiss. 16. 243–261.
Tonini.V. (1990). Scientific Phenomenology and Bioethics. The Moral Sense and Its Foundational Significance: Self. Person. Historicity. Community :145-157.
Wahab. M. Y. (2018. December). The Effectivity of Physical Fitness Test on Multi Level Run to Improve Students’ Motivation. Performance and Achievement. In PROCEEDING INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR.
Yarmohammadian. M. H. (2002). Principles of First Planning. Third Edition. Tehran: Book Memorial Publications. [In Persian].
Ziaei. R. (1990). Planning. teaching and multi-grade classes. Tehran: Teacher Training Center. [In Persian].