• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Research in Teaching

  1. Home
  2. Article Information

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

,

Document Type : Research Paper

  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share
  • XML
  • PDF 745.85 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Andersen, K. and Miller, E.D. (1997). Gender and student evaluations of teaching; Political Science  Politics, 30 (2): 216-219.
Basow, S.A. and Silberg, N.T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of  Educational Psycholog, 79 (3): 308-314.
Bellamy, L.D. and  Evans, D. and Linder, B. and McNeill. G & Raupp.A .(1999). Active learning, team and quality management principles in the engineering classroom. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education.Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.
Brent, R., Felder, R.M. (2008). Writing assignments Pathways to connections, clarity, creativity; College Teaching, 2 (2): 43-47.
Bloom, B.S. (2010). Taxonomy of educational objectives1:Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
Burns-Glover, A.L. and Veith, D.J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluation. Sex still makes a different. Journal of Social Behanior & Personality, 10 (6): 69-80.
Campbell.W.E. and Smith, K.A. (2009). New paradigms for college teaching. Edina, Minn.: Interaction Book Company.
Centra, J.A. and Gaubatz, N.B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluation of teaching? Journal of Higher Education, 71(1): 17-33.
Deming, W.E .(2004). The new economics. 2d ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Studies.
Diller, K. R. and Barnes, J. W. (2000). Adaptation of total quality methods to the administration of an academic engineering department; Journal of  Engineering Education, 3(1): 249-253.
Ganjy, M., Zahed babolan, A. and Moienikia, M. (2012). A meta-analysis of research on the role of teaching patterns on students' academic achievement; Journal of School Psychology; 1(1): 93- 107. (in Persian).
Goodwin, L.D. and Stevens, E.A. (1993). The influence of gender on university faculty’ members’ perceptions of “good” teaching;  Journal of Higher Education, 64 (2): 166-185.
Gronlund .N. E .(2000). How to write and use instructional objectives. 4th ed. New York: Macmillan.
Grasha, A.F. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model,facilitator, and delegator. College Teaching, 42 (4): 142-149.
Houshmand, A.A. C. N., Papadakis, J.F.,  McDonough, T.W. and Fowler, G. and Markle, S. (2004). Methodology for improving quality of instruction; Journal of Engineering Education, 2(3):117-122.
Jensen, P.A. and Robinson, J.K. (2001). Deming’s quality principles applied to a large lecture course; Journal of Engineering Education, 1(5): 45-50.
Johnson .D. W & Johnson.R.T & Smith.K.A .(1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. 2d ed. Edina,Minn.: Interaction Press.
Joseph.C .(2014). Women More Educated Than Men But Still Paid Less. Yale ;Global, 6 March 2014A Publication of the MacMillan Center.
 Karapetrovic.S & Rajamani.D .(2002). An approach to the application of statistical quality control techniques in engineering courses; Journal of Engineering Education; 3(1): 269–276.

Kenneth.K .(2013). Salary differences: Why do women earn less than men? http://www.alumniportal-deutschland.org.

Kardia, D.B. & Wright. M.C .(2004). Instructor identity: The impact of gender and race on faculty experiences with teaching. Occasional Paper. University of Michican Center for Research on Learning and Teaching.
Kuh, G. D & Nelson. L.T. F & Umbach.P. D .(2004). Aligning faculty and student behavior:Realizing the promise of Greater Expectations; Liberal Education; 90 (4): 24-31.
Lacey.C.H & Saleh.A & Gorman.R .(1998). Teaching nine to five: A study of the teaching styles of male and female professors. Paper presented at the Annual Women in Education Conference, Lincoln, Nebraska, October 11-12.
Latzko .W.J .(2011). Modeling the method: The Deming classroom.Quality Management Journal; 5(1): 46–55.
Lisa.V & Raymond. B. (2001). Teaching in the medical setting: balancing teaching style , learning styles and teachingmethods; Journal of Medical Teacher; 23(1): 610-612.
Litwhiler.D.W & Kiemele.M.J .(2000). TQM and DOE in an undergraduate curriculum: Success stories; Journal of Engineering Education; 2(1): 147–151.
McKeachie, W. (1999). Teaching tips. 10th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
National Survey of Student Engagement .(2005). Exploring different dimensions of student engagement. Bloomington; IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
Singer.E .(1996). Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty; Research in Higher Education; 37(6): 659-679.
Shelnutt .J.W & Buch.K .(1999). Using total quality principles for strategic planning and curriculum revision; Journal of Engineering Education; 3(1): 201–207.
Shuman. L.J., Atman, C.J. and  Wolfe.H .(1999). Applying TQM in the IE classroom: The switch to active learning. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.
Summers.D. C. S .(1998). TQM education: Parallels between industry and education. Proceedings of the 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education. Washington,D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.
Starbuck.G.H .(2003). College teaching styles by gender. Paper presented at the Western Social
Science Association Annual Meeting; Las Vegas, NV, April 9-12.
Statham.A & Richardson.L & Cook.J.A .(2007).Gender and university teaching: A negotiated difference. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Tartro.C.N. (1995). Gender effects on student evaluation of faculty; Journal of Research and Development in Education;  28(3): 169-173.
Welch, K. (2004). Sex Differences in Language and the Importance of Context: An Observational Study of Classroom Speech;  Yale University, undergraduate thesis.
Whitworth, J.E., Price, B.A. and  Randall, C.H. (2002). Factors that affect business college students opinion of teaching and learning;  Journal of Business Education, 2(3): 282-289.
    • Article View: 5,631
    • PDF Download: 1,203
Research in Teaching
Volume 6, Issue 1
January 0
Pages 144-161
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 745.85 K
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 5,631
  • PDF Download: 1,203

APA

(2018). . Research in Teaching, 6(1), 144-161.

MLA

. "", Research in Teaching, 6, 1, 2018, 144-161.

HARVARD

(2018). '', Research in Teaching, 6(1), pp. 144-161.

CHICAGO

, "," Research in Teaching, 6 1 (2018): 144-161,

VANCOUVER

. Research in Teaching, 2018; 6(1): 144-161.

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb